ABSTRACT
Numerous studies have examined behavioral cues to deception with low temporal video resolution, which does not enable to track the facial movements dynamics. Another problem is the lack of publicly available video databases that allow to develop computer vision algorithms dedicated to the automatic deception recognition. In this paper, we describe a novel publicly available database that consists of 101 video recordings acquired with the use of a high speed camera at 100 fps in a well-controlled laboratory environment and proper illumination. Within this database, over 1.1 million frames were coded providing the ground truth for the potential cues of deception displayed on the subject's face during telling the truth and lying. Some preliminary psychological implications are also presented.
- N. Bhaskaran, I. Nwogu, M. Frank, and V. Govindaraju. Lie to me: Deceit detection via online behavioral learning. In IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition and Workshops, pages 24--29, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. P. Blount. Studies of the movements of the eyelids of animals: blinking. Experimental Physiology, 18(2):111--125, 1927.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. F. Bond and B. M. DePaulo. Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3):214--234, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. D. Bond. Deception detection expertise. Law and Human Behavior, 32(4):339--351, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Bond, CharlesF. and A. Uysal. On lie detection "wizards". Law and Human Behavior, 31(1):109--115, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. J. Cutrow, A. Parks, N. Lucas, and K. Thomas. The objective use of multiple physiological indices in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 9(6):578--588, 1972.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. M. DePaulo, J. J. Lindsay, B. E. Malone, K. Muhlenbruck, Laura; Charlton, and H. Cooper. Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1):74--118, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Ekman and W. Friesen. The repertoire or nonverbal behavior: categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1:49--98, 1969.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Ekman, M. O'Sullivan, and M. G. Frank. A few can catch a liar. Psych. Science, 10(3):263--266, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. G. Frank and P. Ekman. The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6):1429--1439, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Fukuda. Eye blinks: new indices for the detection of deception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40(3):239 -- 245, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. A. Haggard and K. S. Isaacs. Micromomentary facial expressions as indicators of ego mechanisms in psychotherapy, pages 154--165. 1966.Google Scholar
- M. Hirota, H. Uozato, T. Kawamorita, Y. Shibata, and S. Yamamoto. Effect of incomplete blinking on tear film stability. Optometry & Vision Science:, 90(7):650--657, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Leal and A. Vrij. Blinking during and after lying. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32:187--194, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Li, T. Pfister, X. Huang, G. Zhao, and M. Pietikainen. A spontaneous micro-expression database: Inducement, collection and baseline. In IEEE Int. Conf. and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, pages 1--6, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Mann, A. Vrij, and R. Bull. Suspects, lies, and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stake liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26(3):365--376, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. M. Marchak. Detecting false intent using eye blink measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(736), 2013.Google Scholar
- Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Elan linguistic annotator software. http://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/. Accessed: 01/08/2015.Google Scholar
- M. O'Sullivan. Unicorns or tiger woods: Are lie detection experts myths or rarities? a response to on lie detection "wizards" by bond and uysal. Law and Human Behavior, 31(1):117--123, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. O'Sullivan and P. Ekman. The wizards of deception detection. In The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts, pages 269--286. 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. W. Ousler, M. B. Abelson, P. R. Johnston, J. Rodriguez, K. Lane, and L. M. Smith. Blink patterns and lid-contact times in dry-eye and normal subjects. Clinical Ophthalmology, 8:869--874, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. S. Perelman. Detecting deception via eyeblink frequency modulation. PeerJ, 2:e260, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Pérez-Rosas and R. Mihalcea. Cross-cultural deception detection. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 440--445, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Porter and L. ten Brinke. Reading between the lies: Identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions. Psychological Science, 19(5):508--514, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. A. Stern, L. C. Walrath, and R. Goldstein. The endogenous eyeblink. Psychophysiology, 21(1):22--33, 1984.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. ten Brinke and S. Porter. Cry me a river: Identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception. Law and Human Behavior, 36(6):469--477, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. ten Brinke, S. Porter, and A. Baker. Darwin the detective: Observable facial muscle contractions reveal emotional high-stakes lies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4):411--416, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Volbert and R. Banse. Deception detection: How can psychological research assist legal practice? European Psychologist, 19(3):159--161, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Vrij, P. A. Granhag, and S. Porter. Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(3):89--121, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Vrij, J. Oliveira, A. Hammond, and H. Ehrlichman. Saccadic eye movement rate as a cue to deceit. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(1):15 -- 19, 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Wiseman, C. Watt, L. ten Brinke, S. Porter, S.-L. Couper, and C. Rankin. The eyes don't have it: Lie detection and neuro-linguistic programming. PLoS ONE, 7(7):e40259, 07 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Wittenburg, H. Brugman, A. Russel, A. Klassmann, and H. Sloetjes. Elan: a professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2006.Google Scholar
- W.-J. Yan, X. Li, S.-J. Wang, G. Zhao, Y.-J. Liu, Y.-H. Chen, and X. Fu. Casme ii: An improved spontaneous micro-expression database and the baseline evaluation. PLoS ONE, 9(1):e86041, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W.-J. Yan, Q. Wu, J. Liang, Y.-H. Chen, and X. Fu. How fast are the leaked facial expressions: The duration of micro-expressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37(4):217--230, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W.-J. Yan, Q. Wu, Y.-J. Liu, S.-J. Wang, and X. Fu. CASME database: A dataset of spontaneous micro-expressions collected from neutralized faces. In 10th IEEE Int'l Conf. and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, pages 1--7, 2013.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Silesian Deception Database: Presentation and Analysis
Recommendations
Does "lie to me" lie to you? An evaluation of facial clues to high-stakes deception
A precedent for high-stakes deception detection using facial clues.Database consisting of real-world high-stakes deception videos is collected.Methods analyzing facial expressions in unconstrained environments are proposed. During a forensic interview, ...
In Search of Truth: Analysis of Smile Intensity Dynamics to Detect Deception
Advances in Artificial Intelligence - IBERAMIA 2016AbstractDetection of deceptive facial expressions, including estimating smile genuineness, is an important and challenging research topic that draws increasing attention from the computer vision and pattern recognition community. The state-of-the-art ...
High-Stakes Deception Detection Based on Facial Expressions
ICPR '14: Proceedings of the 2014 22nd International Conference on Pattern RecognitionDuring a forensic interview, high-stakes deception is very prevalent notwithstanding the heavy consequences that might result. This paper proposes an automated computer vision solution for detecting high-stakes deception based on facial clues. Four ...
Comments