Kiran Gajanan Javkar
ABSTRACT
As the digital data continues to grow unbounded, users expect intelligent processing and accurate coverage of all its domains. Advances in display technology have led to a variety of viewing devices, each with its own characteristic sizes and resolutions. Thus, a single layout on different sized devices would degrade the user experience. Moreover, the information shown on display does not need to have same features. So, it becomes very crucial to develop a user interface which can cope up with different sized viewing devices and different data set information. To facilitate the same, we hereby present a novel approach to identify key information from various data sets and display the same on wide range of devices using comparable but different grid-based layouts.
- J.D. Mackinlay. Automatic Design of Graphical Presentations. PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1985. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- D. Seligmann and S. Feiner. Automated generation of intent-based 3d illustrations. Computer Graphics, 25(3), July 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Rist and E. Andre. From presentation tasks to pictures including depictions of 3D objects: Towards an approach to automatic graphics design. German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, DFI, 1992Google Scholar
- Winfried Graf, Constraint-Based Graphical Layout of Multimodal Presentations, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3, W-6600 Saarbrucken 11, Germany, January 1992Google Scholar
- J. Sullivan and S. Tyler, editors. Intelligent User Interfaces. Frontier Series. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1991. Google Scholar
- W. Wahlster, E. Andre, S. Bandyopadhyay, W. Graf, and T. Rist. WIP: The coordinated generation of multimodal presentations from a common representation. In Ortony et al. Also DFKI Research Report RR-91-08, Germany, 1992Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Maybury, editor. Intelligent Multimedia Inte1jaces. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1992. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- A. Barr and E. Feigenbaum, editors. The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1. Pitman, London, 1981.Google Scholar
- S. Feiner. A grid-based approach to automating display layout. In Proceedings of the Graphics Interface '88, pages 192--197. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, June 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Friedell. Automatic synthesis of graphical object descriptions. Computer Graphics, 18(3):53--62, 1984. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Beach. Setting Tables and Illustrations with Style. PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Ontario, 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Sutherland. Sktechpad: A man-machine graphical communication system. In IFIPS Proceedings of the Spring Joint Computer Confe1'cnce, pa.ges 329--345, 1963. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Borning. The programming language aspects of ThingLab, a constraintoriented simulation laboratory. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 3(4):353--387, October 1981. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Borning, R. Duisberg, B. Freeman-Benson, A. Kramer, and M. Woolf. Constraint hierarchies. In Proceedings oj OOPSLA '87, pages 48--60, October 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Freeman-Benson, J. Maloney, and A. Borning. An incremental constraint solver. Communications of the ACM, 33(1):54--63, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G.J. Sussman and G.L. Steele. Constraints - a language for expressing almost-hierachical descriptions. Artificial Int elligence, 14(1): 1--39, 1980.Google Scholar
- G. Nelson. Juno, a constraint-based graphics system. Pmceedings of th e SIGGRAPH '85, 19(3):235--243, 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C.J. van Wyk. A high-level language for specifying pictures. ACM 1hmsactions on Graphics, 1(2):163--182, 1982. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Gosling. Algebraic Constraints. PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer Science. Carnegie Mellon University, 1983. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. LeIer, editor. Constraint Programming Languages: Their Specification and Generation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Cohen, E. Smith, and 1. Iverson. Constraint-based tiled windows. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 6(5):35--45, 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chuck Jacobs, Wilmot Li, Evan Schrier, David Bargeron, and David Salesin, Adaptive Document Layout, Aug. 2004.Google Scholar
- B. Myers. Using AI techniques to create user interfaces by example. In Sullivan and Tyler, pages 385--402. Peridot, 1991 Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Variable Feature Sets in Grid-based Layouts
Recommendations
Comparing the usability of grid-bag and constraint-based layouts
OzCHI '12: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction ConferenceWhile the usability of GUI design methods has been studied in general, the usability of layout specification methods is largely unexplored.
In this paper we provide an empirical comparison of two popular GUI layout models, grid-bag layout and constraint-...
Analysis of Tactile Elements Based on Classification of a Tactile User Interface
RACS '16: Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Adaptive and Convergent SystemsToday, the graphical user interface is rapidly being transformed into a tactile user interface. While the sense of touch and the sense of sight can be considered together in a tactile user interface, the integration of touch and sight is under-...
Towards virtualization of user interfaces based on UsiXML
Web3D '05: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on 3D Web technologyA model-based approach is presented for structuring a development process of virtual user interfaces based on UsiXML, a XML-compliant User Interface Description Language. UsiXML provides a Concrete User Interface description that remains independent ...
Comments