skip to main content
10.1145/2837689.2837693acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Expanding the utility of geospatial knowledge bases by linking concepts to WikiText and to polygonal boundaries

Published:26 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This vision paper argues that a geospatial knowledge base combining textual descriptions for concepts such as places, together with place types, semantic relations between concepts and, most importantly, polygonal geometries associated to the geospatial concepts, constitutes a valuable resource for researchers working on the computational modeling of spatial language. We describe a simple procedure for producing one such resource from existing open datasets, and discuss possible ways for moving beyond the current state-of-the-art within the general area of geospatial text mining, through studies supported by one such knowledge base.

References

  1. J. Hoffart, F. M. Suchanek, K. Berberich, and G. Weikum. YAGO2: A spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia. Artif. Intell., 194, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Khan, M. Vasardani, and S. Winter. Extracting spatial information from place descriptions. In ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Computational Models of Place, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Nothman, N. Ringland, W. Radford, T. Murphy, and J. R. Curran. Learning multilingual named entity recognition from Wikipedia. Artif. Intell., 194, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Pustejovsky, P. Kordjamshidi, M.-F. Moens, A. Levine, S. Dworman, and Z. Yocum. SemEval-2015 Task 8: SpaceEval. In International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Roller, M. Speriosu, S. Rallapalli, B. Wing, and J. Baldridge. Supervised text-based geolocation using language models on an adaptive grid. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Speriosu and J. Baldridge. Text-driven toponym resolution using indirect supervision. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. O. Wallgrün, A. Klippel, and T. Baldwin. Building a corpus of spatial relational expressions extracted from Web documents. In ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Expanding the utility of geospatial knowledge bases by linking concepts to WikiText and to polygonal boundaries

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          GIR '15: Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval
          November 2015
          90 pages
          ISBN:9781450339377
          DOI:10.1145/2837689

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 November 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate46of61submissions,75%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader