skip to main content
10.1145/2838944.2838949acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrehabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Improving walking ability of children with acquired brain injuries by means of an immersive virtual reality platform

Published:01 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Improving walking ability is one of the main goals of a rehabilitation procedure. New technologies based on Virtual Reality (VR) has been recently flanked standard therapies. In this study, 4 children suffering from acquired brain injury (ABI) underwent a 5 session treatment with the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab (GRAIL), to improve walking and balance ability. The GRAIL is an instrumented multi-sensor platform based on immersive virtual reality for gait training and rehabilitation in engaging VR environments, which has been included in few studies to evaluate gait patterns in normal and disabled people and to improve gait in adults. Results are promising: improvements were recorded at the ankle level, selectively at the affected side, and at the pelvic level, thus improving the walking pattern symmetry. Small changes were measured at the hip and knee joints, which were already comparable to healthy subjects. These results suggest that a longer intervention may be even more effective. In the next future more children will be enrolled to strongly prove the effectiveness of GRAIL in the rehabilitation of children with ABI.

References

  1. Bellani, M., Fornasari, L., Chittaro, L. and Brambilla, P. Virtual reality in autism: state of the art. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci., 20, 3 (Sep 2011), 235--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Beltran, E. J., Dingwell, J. B. and Wilken, J. M. Margins of stability in young adults with traumatic transtibial amputation walking in destabilizing environments. J. Biomech., 47, 5 (Mar 21 2014), 1138--1143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Beretta, E., Romei, M., Molteni, E., Avantaggiato, P. and Strazzer, S. Combined robotic-aided gait training and physical therapy improve functional abilities and hip kinematics during gait in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury. Brain Inj., (Apr 27 2015), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cameirao, M. S., Badia, S. B., Duarte, E., Frisoli, A. and Verschure, P. F. The combined impact of virtual reality neurorehabilitation and its interfaces on upper extremity functional recovery in patients with chronic stroke. Stroke, 43, 10 (Oct 2012), 2720--2728.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Darter, B. J. and Wilken, J. M. Gait training with virtual reality-based real-time feedback: improving gait performance following transfemoral amputation. Phys. Ther., 91, 9 (Sep 2011), 1385--1394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Fung, J., Richards, C. L., Malouin, F., McFadyen, B. J. and Lamontagne, A. A treadmill and motion coupled virtual reality system for gait training post-stroke. Cyberpsychol Behav., 9, 2 (Apr 2006), 157--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Geijtenbeek, T., Steenbrink, F., Otten, B. and Even-Zohar, O. D-flow: Immersive Virtual Reality and Real-time Feedback for Rehabilitation. In Anonymous Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry. (Hong Kong, China, ). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2011, 201--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gutierrez, R. O., Galan Del Rio, F., Cano de la Cuerda, R., Alguacil Diego, I. M., Gonzalez, R. A. and Page, J. C. A telerehabilitation program by virtual reality-video games improves balance and postural control in multiple sclerosis patients. NeuroRehabilitation, 33, 4 ( 2013), 545--554.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hak, L., Houdijk, H., van der Wurff, P., Prins, M. R., Mert, A., Beek, P. J. and van Dieen, J. H. Stepping strategies used by post-stroke individuals to maintain margins of stability during walking. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), 28, 9-10 (Nov-Dec 2013), 1041--1048.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Holden, M. K. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav., 8, 3 (Jun 2005), 187--211; discussion 212--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kaufman, K. R., Wyatt, M. P., Sessoms, P. H. and Grabiner, M. D. Task-specific fall prevention training is effective for warfighters with transtibial amputations. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 472, 10 (Oct 2014), 3076--3084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lamontagne, A., Fung, J., McFadyen, B. J. and Faubert, J. Modulation of walking speed by changing optic flow in persons with stroke. J. Neuroeng Rehabil., 4(Jun 26 2007), 22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Luna-Oliva, L., Ortiz-Gutierrez, R. M., Cano-de la Cuerda, R., Piedrola, R. M., Alguacil-Diego, I. M., Sanchez-Camarero, C. and Martinez Culebras Mdel, C. Kinect Xbox 360 as a therapeutic modality for children with cerebral palsy in a school environment: a preliminary study. NeuroRehabilitation, 33, 4 ( 2013), 513--521.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. McAndrew, P. M., Dingwell, J. B. and Wilken, J. M. Walking variability during continuous pseudo-random oscillations of the support surface and visual field. J. Biomech., 43, 8 (May 28 2010), 1470--1475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. O'Neil, R. L., Skeel, R. L. and Ustinova, K. I. Cognitive ability predicts motor learning on a virtual reality game in patients with TBI. NeuroRehabilitation, 33, 4 ( 2013), 667--680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Walter, S., Russell, D., Wood, E. and Galuppi, B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 39, 4 ( 1997), 214--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Rosie, J. A., Ruhen, S., Hing, W. A. and Lewis, G. N. Virtual rehabilitation in a school setting: is it feasible for children with cerebral palsy? Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol., 10, 1 (Jan 2015), 19--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sessoms, P. H., Wyatt, M., Grabiner, M., Collins, J. D., Kingsbury, T., Thesing, N. and Kaufman, K. Method for evoking a trip-like response using a treadmill-based perturbation during locomotion. J. Biomech., 47, 1 (Jan 3 2014), 277--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Shiri, S., Feintuch, U., Weiss, N., Pustilnik, A., Geffen, T., Kay, B., Meiner, Z. and Berger, I. A virtual reality system combined with biofeedback for treating pediatric chronic headache--a pilot study. Pain Med., 14, 5 (May 2013), 621--627.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sloot, L. H., van der Krogt, M. M. and Harlaar, J. Effects of adding a virtual reality environment to different modes of treadmill walking. Gait Posture, 39, 3 (Mar 2014), 939--945.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Sloot, L. H., van der Krogt, M. M. and Harlaar, J. Self-paced versus fixed speed treadmill walking. Gait Posture, 39, 1 (2014), 478--484.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. van den Bogert, A. J., Geijtenbeek, T., Even-Zohar, O., Steenbrink, F. and Hardin, E. C. A real-time system for biomechanical analysis of human movement and muscle function. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 51, 10 (Oct 2013), 1069--1077.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. van der Krogt, M. M., Sloot, L. H. and Harlaar, J. Overground versus self-paced treadmill walking in a virtual environment in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture, 40, 4 (Sep 2014), 587--593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Wang, M. and Reid, D. Using the virtual reality-cognitive rehabilitation approach to improve contextual processing in children with autism. Scientific WorldJournal, 2013(Nov 13 2013), 716890.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Improving walking ability of children with acquired brain injuries by means of an immersive virtual reality platform

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        REHAB '15: Proceedings of the 3rd 2015 Workshop on ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques
        October 2015
        176 pages
        ISBN:9781450338981
        DOI:10.1145/2838944

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 October 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader