skip to main content
10.1145/2839462.2839500acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sparse Tangibles: Collaborative Exploration of Gene Networks using Active Tangibles and Interactive Tabletops

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present Sparse Tangibles, a tabletop and active tangible-based framework to support cross-platform, collaborative gene network exploration using a Web interface. It uses smartwatches as active tangibles to allow query construction on- and off-the-table. We expand their interaction vocabulary using inertial sensors and a custom case. We also introduce a new metric for measuring the "confidence level" of protein and genetic interactions. Three expert biologists evaluated the system and found it fun, useful, easy to use, and ideal for collaborative explorations.

References

  1. Albert-László Barabási. 2015. Network Science. Cambridge University. Retrieved July 21, 2015 from http://www.barabasi.com/networksciencebookGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreas Beyer, Sourav Bandyopadhyay, and Trey Ideker. 2007. Integrating physical and genetic maps: From genomes to interaction networks. Nature Reviews Genetics 8, 9: 699--710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Kevin R. Brown, David Otasek, Muhammad Ali, Michael J. McGuffin, Wing Xie, Baiju Devani, Ian Lawson van Toch, and Igor Jurisica. 2009. NAViGaTOR: network analysis, visualization and graphing Toronto. Bioinformatics 25, 24: 3327--3329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ken Camarata, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, Brian R. Johnson, and Mark D. Gross. 2002. Navigational blocks: navigating information space with tangible media. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (IUI '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Andrew Chatr-aryamontri, Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz, Rose Oughtred, Lorrie Boucher, Sven Heinicke, Daici Chen, Chris Stark, Ashton Breitkreutz, Nadine Kolas, Lara O'Donnell, Teresa Reguly, Julie Nixon, Lindsay Ramage, Andrew Winter, Adnane Sellam, Christie Chang, Jodi Hirschman, Chandra Theesfeld, Jennifer Rust, Michael S. Livstone, Kara Dolinski, and Mike Tyers. 2014. The BioGRID interaction database: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Research: gku1204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhenjun Hu, Joe Mellor, Jie Wu, Takuji Yamada, Dustin Holloway, and Charles DeLisi. 2005. VisANT: data-integrating visual framework for biological networks and modules. Nucleic Acids Research 33, 2: W352-W357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hans-Christian Jetter, Jens Gerken, Michael Zöllner, Harald Reiterer, and Natasa Milic-Frayling. 2011. Materializing the query with facet-streams: a hybrid surface for collaborative search on tabletops. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3013--3022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Stefanie Klum, Petra Isenberg, Ricardo Langner, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Raimund Dachselt. 2012. Stackables: combining tangibles for faceted browsing. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '12), Genny Tortora, Stefano Levialdi, and Maurizio Tucci (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 241--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Christina Laufer, Bernd Fischer, Wolfgang Huber, and Michael Boutros. 2014. Measuring genetic interactions in human cells by RNAi and imaging. Nature Protocols 9, 10: 2341--2353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Robert D. Leclerc. 2008. Survival of the sparsest: robust gene networks are parsimonious. Molecular Systems Biology 4, 1: 213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ben Lehner. 2011. Molecular mechanisms of epistasis within and between genes. Trends in Genetics 27, 8: 323--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Martin Kaltenbrunner and Ross Bencina. 2007. reacTIVision: a computer-vision framework for table-based tangible interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (TEI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 69--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ali Mazalek and Ahmed Sabbir Arif. 2014. Mobile-based tangible interaction techniques for shared displays. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services (MobileHCI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 561--562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Vishal R. Patel, K. Eckel-Mahan, P. Sassone-Corsi, and P. Baldi. 2014. How pervasive are circadian oscillations? Trends in Cell Biology 24, 6: 329--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Patrick C. Phillips. 2008. Epistasis---the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nature Reviews Genetics 9, 11: 855--867.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jun Rekimoto, Brygg Ullmer, and Haruo Oba. 2001. DataTiles: a modular platform for mixed physical and graphical interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 269--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Steven Schkolne, Hiroshi Ishii, and Peter Schroder. 2004. Immersive Design of DNA Molecules with a Tangible Interface. In Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '04 (VIS '04). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 227--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Orit Shaer, Megan Strait, Consuelo Valdes, Heidi Wang, Taili Feng, Michael Lintz, Michelle Ferreirae, Casey Grote, Kelsey Tempel, and Sirui Liu. 2012. The design, development, and deployment of a tabletop interface for collaborative exploration of genomic data. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70, 10: 746--764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Paul Shannon, Andrew Markiel, Owen Ozier, Nitin S. Baliga, Jonathan T. Wang, Daniel Ramage, Nada Amin, Benno Schwikowski, and Trey Ideker. 2003. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research 13, 11: 2498--2504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Brygg Ullmer, Hiroshi Ishii, and Robert J. K. Jacob. 2003. Tangible query interfaces: physically constrained tokens for manipulating database queries. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT '03), Vol. 3. IOS, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 279--286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Consuelo Valdes, Diana Eastman, Casey Grote, Shantanu Thatte, Orit Shaer, Ali Mazalek, Brygg Ullmer, and Miriam K. Konkel. 2014. Exploring the design space of gestural interaction with active tokens through user-defined gestures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4107--4116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kristel Van Steen. Travelling the world of gene--gene interactions. 2011. Briefings in bioinformatics: bbr012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. David Warde-Farley, Sylva L. Donaldson, Ovi Comes, Khalid Zuberi, Rashad Badrawi, Pauline Chao, Max Franz, Chris Grouios, Farzana Kazi, Christian Tannus Lopes, Anson Maitland, Sara Mostafavi, Jason Montojo, Quentin Shao, George Wright, Gary D. Bader, and Quaid Morris. 2010. The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Research 38, 2: W214-W220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Yubao Wu, Xiaofeng Zhu, Jian Chen, and Xiang Zhang. 2013. EINVis: a visualization tool for analyzing and exploring genetic interactions in large-scale association studies. Genetic Epidemiology 37, 7: 675--685.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Wendy Xu, Kimberly Chang, Nicole Francisco, Consuelo Valdes, Robert Kincaid, and Orit Shaer. 2013. From wet lab bench to tangible virtual experiment: SynFlo. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 399--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Sparse Tangibles: Collaborative Exploration of Gene Networks using Active Tangibles and Interactive Tabletops

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        TEI '16: Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
        February 2016
        820 pages
        ISBN:9781450335829
        DOI:10.1145/2839462

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 February 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        TEI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate45of178submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader