skip to main content
10.1145/2843043.2843069acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesaus-cswConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Is computing for social good the solution to closing the gender gap in computer science?

Published:01 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computers are ubiquitous in modern western society, yet few people in the general public have a good understanding of what Computer Science is, and what Computer Scientists do. The typical view of Computer Science is of a male-oriented discipline that focuses on technology and eschews social interaction. This stereotypical view does not appeal to female students. As a consequence, there is a significant gender gap between male and female participation in Computer Science. This paper reviews research on how Computer Science is perceived and argues that the inclusion of socially relevant examples and exercises in early computing courses may help the discipline to be perceived in a more positive light, and subsequently improve participation rates of women in computing.

References

  1. Women Who Choose Computer Science -- What Really Matters. Retrieved June 10, 2015 from http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.wenca.cn/en/us/edu/pdf/women-who-choose-what-really.pdf, May 26, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Adams. Top Degrees For Getting Hired In 2015. Retrieved May 6, 2015 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2014/11/12/top-degrees-for-getting-hired-in-2015/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Buckley. Viewpoint: Computing As Social Science. Commun. ACM, 52(4):29--30, Apr. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Buckley, H. Kershner, K. Schindler, C. Alphonce, and J. Braswell. Benefits of Using Socially-relevant Projects in Computer Science and Engineering Education. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '04, pages 482--486, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Buckley, J. Nordlinger, and D. Subramanian. Socially Relevant Computing. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '08, pages 347--351, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Cheryan, V. C. Plaut, C. Handron, and L. Hudson. The Stereotypical Computer Scientist: Gendered Media Representations as a Barrier to Inclusion for Women. Sex Roles, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. V. C. Galpin and I. D. Sanders. Perceptions of Computer Science at a South African University. Comput. Educ., 49(4):1330--1356, Dec. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Goldweber. A Day One Computing for the Social Good Activity. ACM Inroads, 3(3):46--49, Sept. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Goldweber. Computer Science Education for Social Good. SIGCAS Comput. Soc., 45(2):29--30, July 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Goldweber, J. Barr, T. Clear, R. Davoli, S. Mann, E. Patitsas, and S. Portnoff. A Framework for Enhancing the Social Good in Computing Education: A Values Approach. ACM Inroads, 4(1):58--79, Mar. 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Goldweber, J. Barr, and E. Patitsas. Computer Science Education for Social Good. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '13, pages 15--16, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Goldweber, R. Davoli, J. C. Little, C. Riedesel, H. Walker, G. Cross, and B. R. Von Konsky. Enhancing the Social Issues Components in Our Computing Curriculum: Computing for the Social Good. ACM Inroads, 2(1):64--82, Feb. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Guzdial. Teaching Computing for Everyone. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 21(4):6--6, Apr. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Impagliazzo, editor. SIGCSE Bulletin: Special Issue -- Women and Computing, volume 34, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and IEEE Computer Society. Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. Layman, L. Williams, and K. Slaten. Note to Self: Make Assignments Meaningful. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '07, pages 459--463, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Margolis and A. Fisher. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. McLeod, H. Forgasz, and C. Lang. IT stereotypes in television shows. In H. Deng and C. Standing, editors, Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), pages 1--10, Melbourne, Australia, December 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Papastergiou. Are Computer Science and Information Technology Still Masculine Fields? High School Students' Perceptions and Career Choices. Comput. Educ., 51(2):594--608, Sept. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Peckham, L. L. Harlow, D. A. Stuart, B. Silver, H. Mederer, and P. D. Stephenson. Broadening Participation in Computing: Issues and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '07, pages 9--13, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. C. Rader, D. Hakkarinen, B. M. Moskal, and K. Hellman. Exploring the Appeal of Socially Relevant Computing: Are Students Interested in Socially Relevant Problems? In Proceedings of the 42Nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '11, pages 423--428, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. L. J. Sax, K. Lehman, J. A. Jacobs, A. Kanny, G. Lim, L. N. Paulson, and H. Zimmerman. Anatomy of an Enduring Gender Gap: The Evolution of Women's Participation in Computer Science. Paper presented at the {Year} annual meeting of the American Educational Research Paper presented at the 2015 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved 09/09/15, from the AERA Online Paper Repository, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. B. Shneiderman. Computer Science Education and Social Relevance. SIGCSE Bulletin, 3(1):21--24, March 1971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. T. Soper. Analysis: The exploding demand for computer science education, and why America needs to keep up. Retrieved from http://www.geekwire.com/2014/analysis-examining-computer-science-education-explosion/ on 09/09/15, June 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. H. M. Walker. What Image Do CS1/CS2 Present to Our Students? SIGCSE Bull., 39(4):18--19, Dec. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Is computing for social good the solution to closing the gender gap in computer science?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ACSW '16: Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference
        February 2016
        654 pages
        ISBN:9781450340427
        DOI:10.1145/2843043

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 February 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ACSW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate77of172submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate204of424submissions,48%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader