skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2859023acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Canine Behavior and Working Dog Suitability from Quantimetric Data

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

I propose new approaches for assessing the suitability of dogs for a given working dog occupation. The main focus is placed on continuously-recording technology that does not rely on constant human observation. Examples are provided in the form of two pilot studies. One study uses quantimetric technologies to better understand the relationship between restfulness and performance during advanced training and the other is an ongoing longitudinal study with service dogs being raised and trained for Canine Companions for Independence. In this manuscript, I describe work underway for these efforts in working dog prediction and assessment, as well as a pilot study on how these devices can be used to better understand the needs of non-working (pet) dogs.

References

  1. Joelle Alcaidinho, Giancarlo Valentin, Stephanie Tai, Brian Nguyen, Krista Sanders, Melody Jackson, Eric Gilbert, and Thad Starner. 2015. Leveraging Mobile Technology to Increase the Permanent Adoption of Shelter Dogs. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 463--469. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Joelle Alcaidinho, Giancarlo Valentin, Nate Yoder, Stephanie Tai,, Kerinne Levy, Paul Mundell, and Melody Jackson. 2014. Quantimetric Analysis of the Relationship Between Restfulness and Dog Training Outcomes. In 9th International Working Dog Conference, Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Walter F Burghardt. 2003. Behavioral considerations in the management of working dogs. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 33, 2 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Irit Gazit, Yizhar Lavner, Gil Bloch, Ophir Azulai, Allen Goldblatt, and Joseph Terkel. 2003. A simple system for the remote detection and analysis of sniffing in explosives detection dogs. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 35, 1 (2003), 82--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. F Hu, D Silver, and André Trudel. 2007. LonelyDog@ Home. In Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology Workshops, 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on. IEEE, 333--337. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Melody M Jackson, Giancarlo Valentin, Larry Freil, Lily Burkeen, Clint Zeagler, Scott Gilliland, Barbara Currier, and Thad Starner. 2015. FIDO-Facilitating interactions for dogs with occupations: wearable communication interfaces for working dogs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 19, 1 (2015), 155--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Clara Mancini, Janet van der Linden, Gerd Kortuem, Guy Dewsbury, Daniel Mills, and Paula Boyden. 2014. UbiComp for animal welfare: envisioning smart environments for kenneled dogs. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 117--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Karen L Overall and Arthur E Dunham. 2005. A protocol for predicting performance in military working dogs: roles for anxiety assessment and genetic markers. (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mikko Paldanius, Tuula Kärkkäinen, Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, Oskar Juhlin, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2011. Communication technology for human-dog interaction: exploration of dog owners' experiences and expectations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2641--2650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. BI Resner. 2001. Rover@ Home: Computer Mediated Remote Interaction for Dogs. Media Arts and Sciences MS, Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jesus Savage, RA Sanchez-Guzman, Walterio Mayol-Cuevas, Leobardo Arce, Alejandro Hernandez, Laura Brier, Felipe Martinez, Anaid Velazquez, and Gerardo Lopez. 2000. Animal-machine interfaces. In Wearable Computers, The Fourth International Symposium on. IEEE, 191--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. James A Serpell and Yuying Hsu. 2001. Development and validation of a novel method for evaluating behavior and temperament in guide dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72, 4 (2001), 347--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. David L Sinn, Samuel D Gosling, and Stewart Hilliard. 2010. Personality and performance in military working dogs: Reliability and predictive validity of behavioral tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 127, 1 (2010), 51--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. JM Slabbert and JSJ Odendaal. 1999. Early prediction of adult police dog efficiency longitudinal study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 64, 4 (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lisa M Tomkins, Peter C Thomson, and Paul D McGreevy. 2012. Associations between motor, sensory and structural lateralisation and guide dog success. The Veterinary Journal 192, 3 (2012), 359--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Chadwick A Wingrave, Jeremy Rose, Todd Langston, and Joseph J LaViola Jr. 2010. Early explorations of CAT: Canine amusement and training. In CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2661--2670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Canine Behavior and Working Dog Suitability from Quantimetric Data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450340823
      DOI:10.1145/2851581

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader