ABSTRACT
This SIG focuses on the engineering of automation in interactive critical systems. Automation has already been studied in a number of (sub-) disciplines and application fields: design, human factors, psychology, (software) engineering, aviation, health care, games. One distinguishing feature of the area we are focusing on is that in the field of interactive critical systems properties such as reliability, dependability, fault-tolerance are as important as usability, user experience or overall acceptance issues. The SIG targets at two problem areas: first the engineering of the user interaction with (partly-) autonomous systems: how to design, build and assess autonomous behavior, especially in cases where there is a need to represent on the user interface both autonomous and interactive objects. An example of such integration is the representation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) (where no direct interaction is possible), together with aircrafts (that have to be instructed by an air traffic controller to avoid the UAV). Second the design and engineering of user interaction in general for autonomous objects/systems (for example a cruise control in a car or an autopilot in an aircraft).
- Billings, Charles E., Aviation Automation the Search for a Human Centered Approach Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ. (1997)Google Scholar
- Giannakopoulou D., Rungta N., Feary M. Automated test case generation for an autopilot requirement prototype. IEEE SMC 2011: 1825--1830Google Scholar
- Palmer, E. "Oops, it didn't arm." A Case Study of Two Automation Surprises. 8th Int. Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, (1995).Google Scholar
- Sarter, N. D., Woods D. How in the World Did I Ever Get Into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control, Human Factors, 37(1), (1995).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Boy, G.A., Grote, G. Authority in Increasingly Complex Human and Machine Collaborative Systems: Application to the Future Air Traffic Management Construction. In Proc International Ergonomics Association World Congress, Beijing, China (2009).Google Scholar
- Sheridan, T.B., Verplanck, W.L. Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. Technical report. Manmachine systems lab, Dept of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, (1978).Google Scholar
- Rödel, C., Stadler, S., Meschtscherjakov, A., Tscheligi, M. 2014. Towards Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI'14). ACM, New York, 8 p. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Palanque P., Basnyat S. Task Patterns for Taking Into Account in an Efficient and Systematic Way Both Standard and Erroneous User Behaviours. Human Error, Safety and Systems Development 2004: 109--130Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Multiple Views on Safety-Critical Automation: Aircrafts, Autonomous Vehicles, Air Traffic Management and Satellite Ground Segments Perspectives
Recommendations
Engineering automation in interactive critical systems
CHI EA '11: CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis SIG focuses on the engineering of automation in interactive critical systems. Automation has already been studied in a number of (sub-) disciplines and application fields: design, human factors, psychology, (software) engineering, aviation, health ...
Research on Error Proofing Design of Boeing and Airbus Cockpit from Pilots Survey
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics - Volume 9174Human errors are main causes of most aircraft accidents. Fighting on human errors is important mission of aircraft designer as well as pilot and air traffic controller. Error proofing design for controls in aircraft cockpit is one of the design goals of ...
Operations safety: an assessment of a commercial aviation safety program
AbstractOperations safety is an important issue in operations management. While prior studies have focused on the operational performance of various airlines and airports, few have assessed the efficacy of government airline safety programs. This ...
Comments