skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2892302acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Investigating Interaction Techniques for State-of-the-Art Smartwatches

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present initial results from a comparative study targeting three different input techniques for smartwatches. We developed a prototype capable of two different mechanical input techniques, namely digital crown and rotatable bezel, as well as touch input. In a user study with 14 participants, we analyzed task completion time, error rate and perceived usability in a one-dimensional list selection task. Our results show that touch and digital crown are perceived as significantly more usable. Also, the digital crown technique is ranked significantly higher than the rotatable bezel in terms of user preference. Regarding task completion time, the rotatable bezel is significantly inferior to touch. In terms of error rate, no significant difference is observable. Overall, 9 of 14 participants preferred interaction with the digital crown.

References

  1. Youngseok Ahn, Sungjae Hwang, HyunGook Yoon, Junghyeon Gim, and Jung-hee Ryu. 2015. BandSense: Pressure-Sensitive Multi-Touch Interaction on a Wristband. In Proc. CHI EA '15. 251-254. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2725441 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Daniel L Ashbrook, Patrick Baudisch, and Sean White. 2011. Nenya: Subtle and Eyes-Free Mobile Input with a Magnetically-Tracked Finger Ring. In Proc. CHI '11. 2043-2046. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Daniel L Ashbrook, James R Clawson, Kent Lyons, Thad E Starner, and Nirmal Patel. 2008a. Quickdraw: The Impact of Mobility and On-Body Placement on Device Access Time. In Proc. CHI '08. 219-222. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357092 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Daniel L Ashbrook, Kent Lyons, and Thad Starner. 2008b. An Investigation Into Round Touchscreen Wristwatch Interaction. In Proc. MobileHCI '08. 311- 314. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1409240.1409276 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Patrick Baudisch and Gerry Chu. 2009. Backof-Device Interaction Allows Creating Very Small Touch Devices. In Proc. CHI '09. 1923-1932. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518995 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gábor Blaskó and Steven Feiner. Evaluation of an Eyes-Free Cursorless Numeric Entry System for Wearable Computers. In ISWC '06. IEEE, 21-28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2006.286338Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gábor Blaskó and Steven Feiner. 2004. An Interaction System for Watch Computers Using Tactile Guidance and Bidirectional Segmented Strokes. ISWC '04 1 (2004), 120-123. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISWC. 2004.6 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Markus Funk, Alireza Sahami, Niels Henze, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. Using a Touch-Sensitive Wristband for Text Entry on Smart Watches. In Proc. CHI EA '14. 2305-2310. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581143 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Chris Harrison and Scott E Hudson. 2009. Abracadabra: Wireless, High-Precision, and Unpowered Finger Input for Very Small Mobile Devices. In Proc. UIST '09. 121-124. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 1622176.1622199 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Frederic Kerber, Pascal Lessel, and Antonio Krüger. 2015. Same-Side Hand Interactions with Arm-Placed Devices Using EMG. In CHI EA '15. 1367-1372. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732895 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hamed Ketabdar, Mehran Roshandel, and Kamer Ali Yüksel. 2010. Towards Using Embedded Magnetic Field Sensor for Around Mobile Device 3D Interaction. In Proc. MobileHCI '10. 153-156. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1851600.1851626 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jungsoo Kim, Jiasheng He, Kent Lyons, and Thad Starner. 2007. The Gesture Watch: A Wireless Contact-Free Gesture Based Wrist Interface. In ISWC '07. IEEE, 15-22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iswc. 2007.4373770 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gierad Laput, Robert Xiao, Xiang Anthony' Chen, Scott E Hudson, and Chris Harrison. 2014. Skin Buttons: Cheap, Small, Low-Power and Clickable FixedIcon Laser Projections. In Proc. UIST '14. 389-394. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647356 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kent Lyons. 2015. What Can a Dumb Watch Teach a Smartwatch? Informing the Design of Smartwatches. In Proc. ISWC '15. 3-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2802083.2802084 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Thomas L Martin. Time and Time Again: Parallels in the Development of the Watch and the Wearable Computer. In ISWC '02. IEEE, 5-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2002.1167212 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ian Oakley and Doyoung Lee. 2014. Interaction on the Edge: Offset Sensing for Small Devices. In CHI '14. 169-178. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Masa Ogata and Michita Imai. 2015. SkinWatch: Skin Gesture Interaction for Smart Watch. In Proc. AH '15. 21-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2735711.2735830 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jerome Pasquero, Scott J Stobbe, and Noel Stonehouse. 2011. A Haptic Wristwatch for Eyes-Free Interactions. In Proc. CHI '11. 3257-3266. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979425 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Simon T Perrault, Eric Lecolinet, James Eagan, and Yves Guiard. 2013. WatchIt: Simple Gestures and Eyes-free Interaction for Wristwatches and Bracelets. In Proc. CHI '13. 1451-1460. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1145/2470654.2466192 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Halley P Profita, James Clawson, Scott Gilliland, Clint Zeagler, Thad Starner, Jim Budd, and Ellen Yi-Luen Do. 2013. Don't Mind Me Touching My Wrist. In ISWC '13. 89-96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2493988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mandayam T Raghunath and Chandrasekhar Narayanaswami. 2002. User Interfaces for Applications on a Wrist Watch. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6, 1 (2002), 17-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007790200002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jun Rekimoto. GestureWrist and GesturePad: Unobtrusive Wearable Interaction Devices. In ISWC '01. 21-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2001.962092 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. T Scott Saponas, Desney S Tan, Dan Morris, Ravin Balakrishnan, Jim Turner, and James A Landay. 2009. Enabling Always-Available Input with Muscle-Computer Interfaces. In Proc. UIST '09. 167. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1622176.1622208 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Katie A Siek, Yvonne Rogers, and Kay H Connelly. 2005. Fat Finger Worries: How Older and Younger Users Physically Interact with PDAs. In Proc. INTERACT '05. 267-280. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ 11555261_24 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mark T Smith. 2007. Reconciling ICT and Wearable Design: Ten Lessons from Working with Swatch. In Proc. Workshops ISWC '07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Robert Xiao, Gierad Laput, and Chris Harrison. 2014. Expanding the Input Expressivity of Smartwatches with Mechanical Pan, Twist, Tilt and Click. In Proc. CHI '14. 193-196. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Investigating Interaction Techniques for State-of-the-Art Smartwatches

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450340823
      DOI:10.1145/2851581

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader