skip to main content
10.1145/2851613.2851687acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards automatic induction of abnormal behavioral patterns for recognizing mild cognitive impairment

Published:04 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Global demographics show a steady growth in the population of cognitively impaired patients. Consequently, the aging societies are looking to adopt smart technologies in healthcare services to early detect the onset of cognitive decline. These technologies include advanced methods that enable continuous in-house monitoring of the elderly's activities through unobtrusive sensing for recognizing abnormal behaviors that may indicate cognitive deficits. In an earlier work, we proposed a technique to detect the early symptoms of cognitive impairment by continuously monitoring the daily behavior of an elderly at home to recognize fine-grained abnormal behaviors. Recognition was based on rule-based descriptions of anomalies manually defined by domain experts. However, those rules strongly depend on the specific home environment, on the used sensors, and on the particular habits of the elderly; hence, their definition is time-expensive, and rules are not seamlessly portable to different environments. In order to address this issue, in this paper we propose a method to automatically learn the rule-based definitions of behavioral anomalies. In particular, we use a rule induction algorithm to infer those rules based on a dataset of activities and anomalies. We evaluated our method using a dataset of activities and abnormal behaviors carried out in an instrumented smart home. Our method achieves high precision and recall values, around 0.97 and 0.85, respectively, which are comparable to those obtained using manually-defined rules.

References

  1. C. Apte, E. Grossman, E. Pednault, B. Rosen, F. Tipu, and B. White. Insurance risk modeling using data mining technology. In Proc. of PADD, pages 39--47, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. B. Berry, G. Erdogan, and D. Trigueiros. Rule induction for financial modelling and model interpretation. In Proc. of HICSS. IEEE, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. Clark and T. Niblett. The cn2 induction algorithm. Mach Learn J, 3(4):261--283, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. W. W. Cohen. Fast effective rule induction. In Proc. of ICML, pages 115--123. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. J. Cook, A. S. Crandall, B. L. Thomas, and N. C. Krishnan. Casas: A smart home in a box. Computer, 46(7):62--69, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. R. Daud and D. W. Corne. Human readable rule induction in medical data mining. In Proc. of ECC, LNEE, pages 787--798. Springer, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. P. Dawadi, D. Cook, M. Schmitter-Edgecombe, and C. Parsey. Automated assessment of cognitive health using smart home technologies. Technol Health Care, 21(4):323--343, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Dawadi, D. J. Cook, and M. Schmitter-Edgecombe. Automated cognitive health assessment using smart home monitoring of complex tasks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, 43(6):1302--1313, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. Fürnkranz. Separate-and-conquer rule learning. Artif Intell Rev, 13(1):3--54, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Fürnkranz and G. Widmer. Incremental reduced error pruning. In Proc. of ICML, pages 70--77. Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. T. Giovannetti, B. M. Bettcher, L. Brennan, D. J. Libon, M. Burke, K. Duey, C. Nieves, and D. Wambach. Characterization of everyday functioning in mild cognitive impairment: A direct assessment approach. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 25:359--365, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. H. Witten. The weka data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explor, (11(1):10--18, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Helal and C. Chen. The gator tech smart house: Enabling technologies and lessons learned. In Proc. of ICREATE. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Hipp, U. Güntzer, and G. Nakhaeizadeh. Algorithms for association rule mining - A general survey and comparison. SIGKDD Explor, 2(1):58--64, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. E. Lyons, D. Austin, A. Seelye, J. Petersen, J. Yeargers, T. Riley, N. Sharma, N. Mattek, K. Wild, H. Dodge, and J. A. Kaye. Pervasive computing technologies to continuously assess alzheimer's disease progression and intervention efficacy. Front Aging Neurosci, 7:102, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R. S. Michalski. On the quasi minimal solution of the general covering problem. In Proc. of FCIP, volume A3, pages 25--128, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. R. C. Petersen. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med, 256(3):183--194, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. B. Reisberg, S. H. Ferris, M. J. de Leon, and T. Crook. The global deterioration scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am J Psychiatry, 139(9):1136--1139, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. D. Riboni, C. Bettini, G. Civitarese, Z. H. Janjua, and V. Bulgari. From lab to life: Fine-grained behavior monitoring in the elderly's home. In Proc. of PerCom Workshops. IEEE Comp. Soc., 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. D. Riboni, C. Bettini, G. Civitarese, Z. H. Janjua, and R. Helaoui. Fine-grained recognition of abnormal behaviors for early detection of mild cognitive impairment. In Proc. of PerCom conference. IEEE Comp. Soc., 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. Schmitter-Edgecombe, C. Parsey, and R. Lamb. Development and psychometric properties of the instrumental activities of daily living: Compensation scale. Arch Clin Neuropsych, 29(8):776--792, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. T. Suzuki and S. Murase. Influence of outdoor activity and indoor activity on cognition decline: Use of an infrared sensor to measure activity. Telemed E-Health, (16(6):686--690, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. K. V. Wild, N. Mattek, D. Austin, and J. A. Kaye. Are you sure?: Lapses in self-reported activities among healthy older adults reporting online. J Appl Gerontol, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. World Health Organization. 10 facts on dementia. http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/dementia/en/, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards automatic induction of abnormal behavioral patterns for recognizing mild cognitive impairment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
      April 2016
      2360 pages
      ISBN:9781450337397
      DOI:10.1145/2851613

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SAC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate252of1,047submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader