skip to main content
10.1145/2851613.2851741acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Collaborative processing of data-intensive algorithms with CPU, intelligent SSD, and GPU

Published:04 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The graphic processing unit (GPU) is a computing resource to process graphics-related applications. The intelligent SSD (iSSD) is a solid state device (SSD) that is provided with data processing power. These days, CPU, GPU, and SSD are equipped together in most processing environment. If SSD is replaced with iSSD later on, we have a new processing environment where three computing resources collaborate one another to process a huge volume of data (so called big data) quite effectively. In this paper, we address how to exploit all these computing resources for efficient processing of data-intensive algorithms.Through extensive experiment, we verify the effectiveness and potential of the proposed collaborative processing environment by processing data concurrently with multiple computing resources. The results reveal that processing in the our environment outperforms that in the traditional one by up to 3.5 times.

References

  1. D. Bae et al., "Intelligent SSD: A Turbo for Big Data Mining," In Proc. of ACM Int'l Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM CIKM, pp. 1553--1556, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Gov et al., "GPUTeraSort: High Performance Graphics Coprocessor Sorting for Large Database Management," In Proc. ACM Int'l. Conf. on Management of Data, ACM SIGMOD, pp. 325--336, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Fung and S. Mann, "Using Graphics Devices in Reverse: GPU-based Image Processing and Computer Vision," In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Multimedia and Expo, pp. 9--12, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Ryoo et al., "Optimization Principles and Application Performance Evaluation of a Multithreaded GPU using CUDA," In Proc. ACM SIGPLAN Symp. on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, PPoPP, pp. 73--82, 2008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Kim et al., "Fast, Energy Efficient Scan inside Flash Memory SSDs," In Proc. Int'l Workshop on Accelerating Data Management Systems using Modern Processor and Storage Architectures, ADMS, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Y. Jo et al., "On Running Data-Intensive Algorithms with Intelligent SSD and Host CPU: A Collaborative Approach," In Proc. Int'l Conf. on ACM/SIGAPP Symposium On Applied Computing, ACM SAC, pp. 2060--2065, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Pabst, A. Koch, and W. Straber, "Fast and Scalable CPU=GPU Collision Detection for Rigid and Deformable Surfaces," Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 1605--1612, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Oh and S. Ha, "A Static Scheduling Heuristic for Heterogeneous Processors," In Proc. Int'l Conf. Euro-Par Parallel Processing, pp. 573--577, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Topcuoglu, S. Hariri and M. Wu, "Performance-Effective and Low-Complexity Task Scheduling for Heterogeneous Computing," IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 260--274. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Sih and E. Lee, "A Compile-Time Scheduling Heuristic for Interconnection-Constrained Heterogeneous Processor Architectures," IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 175--187. 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Kwok and I. Ahmad, "Static Scheduling Algorithms for Allocating Directed Task Graphs to Multiprocessors," ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N. Bell and M. Garland, Efficient Sparse Matrix-Vector Multiplication on CUDA, NVIDIA Technical Report, NVIDIA Corporation, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. E. Lee and D. Messerschmitt, "Synchronous data flow," Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 75, No. 9, pp. 1235--1245, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. MacQueen et al., "Some Methods for Classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations," In Proc. of Berkeley Symp. on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 281--297, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. Page et al., The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web, Technical Report, Stanford University, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. G. Jeh and J. Widom, "SimRank: a measure of structural-context similarity," In Proc. of ACM Int'l. Conf. on Knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM SIGKDD, pp. 538--543, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Intel, Intel VTune Amplifier, https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/529213, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Collaborative processing of data-intensive algorithms with CPU, intelligent SSD, and GPU

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
      April 2016
      2360 pages
      ISBN:9781450337397
      DOI:10.1145/2851613

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SAC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate252of1,047submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader