skip to main content
10.1145/2851613.2851981acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deriving UML-based specifications of inter-component interactions from runtime tests

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a model-driven approach for the derivation of inter-component-interaction specifications from runtime tests. In particular, we use test-execution traces to record interactions between architectural components based on testing object-oriented systems. The resulting models are specified via UML diagrams. In order to transform test executions to corresponding component and interaction models, we define conceptual mappings (transformation rules) between a test-execution metamodel and the UML2 metamodel. As a proof of concept, we integrated the approach into our tool KaleidoScope.

References

  1. S. Allier, S. Sadou, H. Sahraoui, and R. Fleurquin. From object-oriented applications to component-oriented applications via component-oriented architecture. In Proc. WICSA'11, pages 214--223. IEEE, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. T. B. C. Arias, P. America, and P. Avgeriou. Defining execution viewpoints for a large and complex software-intensive system. In Proc. WICSA/ECSA'09, pages 1--10. IEEE, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Beugnard, J.-M. Jézéquel, N. Plouzeau, and D. Watkins. Making components contract aware. Computer, 32(7):38--45, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Bojic and D. Velasevic. A use-case driven method of architecture recovery for program understanding and reuse reengineering. In Proc. CSMR'00, pages 23--23. IEEE CS, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Clements, D. Garlan, L. Bass, J. Stafford, R. Nord, J. Ivers, and R. Little. Documenting software architectures: views and beyond. Pearson Education, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. E. Guerra, J. Lara, D. S. Kolovos, R. F. Paige, and O. M. Santos. Engineering model transformations with transML. Softw. Syst. Model., 12(3):555--577, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Haendler. KaleidoScope. Institute for Information Systems and New Media. WU Vienna. http://nm.wu.ac.at/nm/haendler, 2015. Last accessed: 7 December 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Haendler, S. Sobernig, and M. Strembeck. An approach for the semi-automated derivation of UML interaction models from scenario-based runtime tests. In Proc. IC-SOFT-EA'15, pages 229--240. SciTePress, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. P. B. Kruchten. The 4+ 1 view model of architecture. Software, IEEE, 12(6):42--50, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Mancoridis, B. S. Mitchell, C. Rorres, Y.-F. Chen, and E. R. Gansner. Using automatic clustering to produce high-level system organizations of source code. In IWPC'98, pages 45--52, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Meyer. Applying 'Design by Contract'. Computer, 25(10):40--51, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. C. Nebut, F. Fleurey, Y. Le Traon, and J. Jezequel. Automatic test generation: A use case driven approach. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 32(3):140--155, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Ravichandran and M. A. Rothenberger. Software reuse strategies and component markets. Commun. ACM, 46(8):109--114, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Seriai, S. Sadou, H. Sahraoui, and S. Hamza. Deriving component interfaces after a restructuring of a legacy system. In Proc. WICSA'14, pages 31--40. IEEE, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software architecture: perspectives on an emerging discipline, volume 1. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Strembeck. Testing policy-based systems with scenarios. In Proc. IASTED'11, pages 64--71. ACTA Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Deriving UML-based specifications of inter-component interactions from runtime tests

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                SAC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
                April 2016
                2360 pages
                ISBN:9781450337397
                DOI:10.1145/2851613

                Copyright © 2016 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 4 April 2016

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                SAC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate252of1,047submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader