skip to main content
10.1145/2854946.2854950acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Building Realistic Simulations for Interactive Information Retrieval

Published:13 March 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Simulation has been used within the field of Information Retrieval (IR) for many years to evaluate retrieval models and other aspects of the wider IR process. In recent years, there has been a renewed interest towards using simulation for Interactive Information Retrieval (IIR), an area which focuses on the study of human interactions with IR systems. A variety of different interaction models (e.g. click models) associated with behavioural aspects of searchers have over time been developed and evaluated using simulation in order for us to better understand the complex processes involved. Despite these advances, such models are still relatively naïve, and further work is required to make simulations of searchers more realistic. To this end, this project seeks to build more realistic simulations, using a more Complex Searcher Model (CSM). Within the CSM, each component and decision point can be varied and customised as required. The CSM can then be instantiated using components that are grounded from empirical evidence based upon actual real-world searcher behaviour and interaction data.

References

  1. L. Azzopardi. The economics in interactive information retrieval. In Proc. 34th ACM SIGIR, pages 15--24, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Azzopardi. Modelling interaction with economic models of search. In Proc. 37th ACM SIGIR, pages 3--12, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Azzopardi, K. Järvelin, J. Kamps, and M.D. Smucker. Report on the sigir 2010 workshop on the simulation of interaction. SIGIR Forum, 44 (2): 35--47, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Baskaya, H. Keskustalo, and K. Järvelin. Modeling behavioral factors in interactive information retrieval. In Proc. 22nd ACM CIKM, pages 2297--2302, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G.J. Browne, M.G. Pitts, and J.C. Wetherbe. Stopping rule use during web-based search. In Proc. HICSS-38, page 271b, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. W.S. Cooper. On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness part ii. implementation of the philosophy. J. of the American Soc. for Info. Sci., 24 (6): 413--424, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. W.S. Cooper. The paradoxical role of unexamined documents in the evaluation of retrieval effectiveness. Info. Processing and Management, 12 (6): 367--375, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D. Harman. Is the cranfield paradigm outdated? In Proceedings of SIGIR 2010, pages 1--1, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Keskustalo, K. Järvelin, and A. Pirkola. Evaluating the effectiveness of relevance feedback based on a user simulation model: Effects of a user scenario on cumulated gain value. Information Retrieval, 11 (3): 209--228, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D.H. Kraft and T. Lee. Stopping rules and their effect on expected search length. IPM, 15 (1): 47--58, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Maxwell and L. Azzopardi. Stuck in traffic: How temporal delays affect search behaviour. In Proc. 5th IIiX, pages 155--164, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. Maxwell, L. Azzopardi, K. Järvelin, and H. Keskustalo. An initial investigation into fixed and adaptive stopping strategies. In Proc. 38th ACM SIGIR, pages 903--906, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Maxwell, L. Azzopardi, K. Järvelin, and H. Keskustalo. Searching and stopping: An analysis of stopping rules and strategies. In Proc. 24th ACM CIKM, pages 313--322, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Moffat, P. Thomas, and F. Scholer. Users versus models: What observation tells us about effectiveness metrics. In Proc. 22nd ACM CIKM, pages 659--668, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M.D. Smucker. An analysis of user strategies for examining and processing ranked lists of documents. In Proc. of 5th HCIR, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Thomas, A. Moffat, P. Bailey, and F. Scholer. Modeling decision points in user search behavior. In Proc. 5th IIiX, pages 239--242, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Building Realistic Simulations for Interactive Information Retrieval

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHIIR '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
        March 2016
        400 pages
        ISBN:9781450337519
        DOI:10.1145/2854946

        Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 March 2016

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        CHIIR '16 Paper Acceptance Rate23of58submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate55of163submissions,34%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader