skip to main content
10.1145/2876034.2893379acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Investigating the Use of Hints in Online Problem Solving

Published:25 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We investigate the use of hints as a form of scaffolding for 4,652 eligible users on a large-scale online learning environment called Isaac, which allows users to answer physics questions with up to five hints. We investigate user behaviour when using hints, users' engagement with fading (the process of gradually becoming less reliant on the hints provided), and hint strategies including Decomposition, Correction, Verification, or Comparison. Finally, we present recommendations for the design and development of online teaching tools that provide open access to hints, including a mechanism that may improve the speed at which users begin fading.

References

  1. S. Cummins, I. Davies, A. Rice, and A. R. Beresford. 2015. Equality: A tool for free-form equation editing. In ICALT, July 6--9, 2015, Hualien, Taiwan. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Devolder, J. van Braak, and J. Tondeur. 2012. Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28, 6 (Dec. 2012), 557--573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. UK Government. 2015. What different qualification levels mean: Compare different qualifications. (2015).https://www.gov.uk/what-different-qualification-levels-mean/compare-different-qualification-levelsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Julio Guerra, Shaghayegh Sahebi, Yu-Ru Lin, and Peter Brusilovsky. 2014. The Problem Solving Genome: Analyzing Sequential Patterns of Student Work with Parameterized Exercises. In Educational Data Mining conference, July 4th - July 7th, London. 84--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael Hannafin, Susan Land, and Kevin Oliver. 1999. Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory 2 (1999), 115--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Paul A. Kirschner, John Sweller, and Richard E. Clark. 2006. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist 41, 2 (June 2006), 75--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Anton Machacek, Jennifer Crowter, and Lisa Jardine-Wright. 2015. Isaac Physics Skills, 2nd edition: Mastering Essential Pre-University Physics & Developing Problem-Solving Skills. Periphyseos Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Henk J. Pol, Egbert G. Harskamp, Cor J. M. Suhre, and Martin J. Goedhart. 2008. The Effect of Hints and Model Answers in a Student-Controlled Problem-Solving Program for Secondary Physics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17, 4 (May 2008), 410--425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S.M. Ross and J.P.R. Bolton. 2002. Physica: A Computer Environment for Physics Problem-Solving. Interactive Learning Environments 10, 2 (Aug. 2002), 157--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A.H. Schoenfeld. 1992. Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. MacMillan Publishing, New York. 334--370 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Janneke van de Pol, Monique Volman, and Jos Beishuizen. 2010. Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review 22, 3 (April 2010), 271--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jeroen J.G. van Merrienboer. 2013. Perspectives on problem solving and instruction. Computers & Education 64 (May 2013), 153--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jeroen J.G. van Merrienboer and Paul A. Kirschner. 2012. Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approach to Four-Component Instructional Design (2 ed.). Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Investigating the Use of Hints in Online Problem Solving

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        L@S '16: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
        April 2016
        446 pages
        ISBN:9781450337267
        DOI:10.1145/2876034

        Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 April 2016

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Work in Progress

        Acceptance Rates

        L@S '16 Paper Acceptance Rate18of79submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate117of440submissions,27%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader