skip to main content
10.1145/2908812.2908840acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Curvature Flight Path for Particle Swarm Optimisation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

An optimisation is a process of finding maxima or minima of the objective function. Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) is a nature-inspired, meta-heuristic, black box optimisation algorithm used to search for global minimum or maximum in the solution space. The sampling strategy in this algorithm mimics the flying pattern of a swarm, where each sample is generated randomly according to uniform distribution among three different locations, which marks the current particle location, the individual best found location, and the best found location for the entire swam over all generation. The PSO has known disadvantage of premature convergence in problems with high correlated design variables (high epistatis). However, there is limited research conducted in finding the main reason why the algorithm fails to locate better solutions in these problems. In this paper, we propose to change the traditional triangular flight trajectory of PSO to an elliptical flight path. The new flying method is tested and compared with the traditional triangular flight trajectory of PSO on five high epistatis benchmark problems. Our results show that the samples generated from the elliptical flight path are generally better than the traditional triangular flight trajectory of PSO in term of average fitness and the fitness of best found solution.

References

  1. A. Banks, J. Vincent, and C. Anyakoha. A review of particle swarm optimization. part i: background and development. Natural Computing, 6(4):467--484, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. X. Chen, Q. Gu, J. Qi, and D. Chen. Applying particle swarm optimization to pairwise testing. In Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), 2010 IEEE 34th Annual, pages 107--116, July 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Daneshyari and G. G. Yen. Cultural-based multiobjective particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 41(2):553--567, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Daneshyari and G. G. Yen. Cultural multiobjective pso with sensitivity analysis for parameters using additive binary epsion indicator. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 10(2):121--139, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Daneshyari and G. G. Yen. Cultural based particle swarm for dynamic optimization problems. International Journal of Systems Science, 43(7):1284--1304, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Y. F. M. Ding. Phase angle-encoded and quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization applied to three-dimensional route planning for uav. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man and Cybernetics- Part A: Systems and Humans, 42(2):511--526, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Z. X. Fengrui Zhang, Jiangshu Cao. An improved particle swarm optimization filtering algorithm. In International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems (ICCCAS), volume 2, pages 173--177, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. R. Gras. How efficient are genetic algorithms to solve high epistasis deceptive problems? In Evolutionary Computation, 2008. CEC 2008. (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence). IEEE Congress on, pages 242--249, June 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. N. Hansen. Cma-es source code. https://www.lri.fr/hansen/purecmaes.m, 2003--2009. Accessed: 2016-01--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier. Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evol. Comput., 9(2):159--195, June 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. A. D. Jong. Evolutionary Computation: A Unified Approach. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. A. Kadkol and G. G. Yen. A cultural-based particle swarm optimization framework for dynamic, constrained multi-objective optimization. International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research, 3(1):1--29, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on neural networks, volume 4, pages 1942--1948, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. G. R. Maarten Keijzer, Juan J. Merelo Guervós and M. Schoenauer. Evolving objects:a general purpose evolutionary computation library. Artificial Evolution, 2310:829--888, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. no free lunch and problem description length. Fitness-distance-ratio based particle swarm optimization. In In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2001), pages 565--570, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Nocedal and S. Wright. Numerical Optimization. Springer-Verlag, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. K. V. Thanmaya Peram and C. K. Mohan. Fitness-distance-ratio based particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEESwarm Intelligence Symposium, volume 3, pages 174--181, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. D. Wierstra, T. Schaul, T. Glasmachers, Y. Sun, J. Peters, and J. Schmidhuber. Natural evolution strategies. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1):949--980, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. W. T. V. William H. Press, Saul A. Teukolsky and B. P. Flannery. Numerical Recipes. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. H. Wolpert and W. G. Macready. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(1):67--82, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. X.-S. Yang. Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. In In Stochastic Algorithms: Foundations and Applications (SAGA 2009), pages 169--178, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. X.-S. Yang. A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. In In Nature Inspired Cooperative Strategies for Optimization (NISCO2010), pages 65--74, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. X.-S. Yang and S. Deb. Cuckoo search via lévy flights. In In World Congress on Nature and Biological Inspired Computing (NaBIC2009), pages 210--214, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. G. G. Yen and Z. He. Performance metrics ensemble for multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 18(1):131 -- 144, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Curvature Flight Path for Particle Swarm Optimisation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GECCO '16: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016
        July 2016
        1196 pages
        ISBN:9781450342063
        DOI:10.1145/2908812

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 July 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        GECCO '16 Paper Acceptance Rate137of381submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

        Upcoming Conference

        GECCO '24
        Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
        July 14 - 18, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader