Nic DePaula
ABSTRACT
In this study we analyze the communication of local government departments on a social media platform. We analyze Facebook messages according to three models of e-government interactivity, namely: one-way push, two-way pull, and networking, which we integrate with the Excellence theory of public relations by adding the fourth model we term impression management. We conduct a content analysis on 1,472 posts of 52 distinct municipal-level departments of 16 cities across the U.S. We find that most content examined refers to one-way push communication, or the provision of information about policy or department related matters. We also find that much of the content is used for impression management or favorable publicity, which includes an attention to positive imagery and acknowledgements of appreciation toward others. Collaborative or networking type of activity is adopted less than ten percent of the time. We also explore the differences in social media communication strategies across different types of organizations and provide measures of page and content popularity. We find significant differences in strategies and suggest explanations based on a socio-technical view of technology adoption and the particularities of the organizations' missions and purposes. We end this paper with a discussion on the benefits and perils of social media government communication. We suggest that future research may fruitfully examine the factors that contribute to the different levels of interactivity that are observed in the use of these platforms by governments.
- C. Anderson. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More. Hachette Books, New York, July 2008.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. R. Arnstein. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4):216--224, July 1969.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. C. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, and J. M. Grimes. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3):264--271, July 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Bonneau and S. Preibusch. The Privacy Jungle: On the Market for Data Protection in Social Networks. In T. Moore, D. Pym, and C. Ioannidis, editors, Economics of Information Security and Privacy, pages 121--167. Springer US, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Bonsón, S. Royo, and M. Ratkai. Citizens' engagement on local governments' Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1):52--62, Jan. 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Bonsón, L. Torres, S. Royo, and F. Flores. Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2):123--132, Apr. 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. P. Bostrom and J. S. Heinen. MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Part I: The Causes. MIS Quarterly, 1(3):17--32, 1977. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Bovaird. Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public administration review, 67(5):846--860, 2007.Google Scholar
- D. M. Boyd and N. B. Ellison. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1):210--230, Oct. 2007.Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. A. Brainard and J. G. McNutt. Virtual Government--Citizen Relations Informational, Transactional, or Collaborative? Administration & Society, 42(7):836--858, Nov. 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. A. Bryer. Online Public Engagement in the Obama Administration: Building a Democracy Bubble? Policy & Internet, 3(4):1--22, Dec. 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. A. Bryer and S. M. Zavattaro. Social Media and Public Administration: Theoretical Dimensions and Introduction to the Symposium. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(3):325--340, Sept. 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. A. Chun and L. F. Luna Reyes. Social media in government. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4):441--445, Oct. 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Cohen. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):37--46, Apr. 1960.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. I. Criado, R. Sandoval-Almazan, and J. R. Gil-Garcia. Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4):319--326, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Enders, H. Hungenberg, H.-P. Denker, and S. Mauch. The long tail of social networking.: Revenue models of social networking sites. European Management Journal, 26(3):199--211, June 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. E. Fountain. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Golbeck, J. M. Grimes, and A. Rogers. Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8):1612--1621, Aug. 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. E. Grunig. Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. L. Erlbaum Associates, 1992.Google Scholar
- J. E. Grunig and L. A. Grunig. Excellence Theory in Public Relations: Past, Present, and Future. In A. Zerfass, B. v. Ruler, and K. Sriramesh, editors, Public Relations Research, pages 327--347. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Hagen, N. DePaula, E. Dincelli, N. Caidi, and A. Rorissa. Electronic government around the world: Current trends and future prospects. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1):1--2, Jan. 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. M. Harrison, S. Guerrero, G. B. Burke, M. Cook, A. Cresswell, N. Helbig, J. Hrdinová, and T. Pardo. Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, pages 245--253. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. L. Heath. Encyclopedia of Public Relations. SAGE Publications, Aug. 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Hemphill, J. Otterbacher, and M. Shapiro. What's congress doing on twitter? In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 877--886. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Hofmann, D. Beverungen, M. Räckers, and J. Becker. What makes local governments' online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4):387--396, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Hofmann, M. Rackers, D. Beverungen, and J. Becker. Old blunders in new media? How local governments communicate with citizens in online social networks. pages 2023--2032. IEEE, Jan. 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. M. Kaplan and M. Haenlein. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1):59--68, Jan. 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. M. Kaplan and M. Haenlein. Two hearts in three-quarter time: How to waltz the social media/viral marketing dance. Business Horizons, 54(3):253--263, May 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Kim and F. Adam. Social Media, Social Design and Social Construction: A Dialectic Approach for the Use of Social Media in the Public Sector. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 7(3):65--78, 2011.Google Scholar
- N. C. Krämer and S. Winter. Impression Management 2.0. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(3):106--116, Jan. 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Lee and Y. H. Kwak. An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4):492--503, Oct. 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Leston-Bandeira and D. Bender. How Deeply Are Parliaments Engaging on Social Media? Inf. Polity, 18(4):281--297, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Linders. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4):446--454, Oct. 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. F. Liu and J. S. Horsley. The government communication decision wheel: Toward a public relations model for the public sector. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(4):377--393, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. F. Liu, J. S. Horsley, and A. B. Levenshus. Government and Corporate Communication Practices: Do the Differences Matter? Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(2):189--213, May 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. McDermott. Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4):401--413, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Meijer and M. Thaens. Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4):343--350, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Mergel. A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4):327--334, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Mergel. Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2):123--130, Apr. 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Nadkarni and S. G. Hofmann. Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3):243--249, Feb. 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Nam. Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1):12--20, Jan. 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. S. Noveck. Wiki government: how technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press, 2009.Google Scholar
- G. H. M. Oliveira and E. W. Welch. Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4):397--405, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. J. Orlikowski. The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3(3):398--427, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Osborne. Reinventing Government. Public Productivity & Management Review, 16(4):349--356, 1993.Google Scholar
- C. Shirky. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. Penguin Books, 2009.Google Scholar
- M. Z. Sobaci and N. Karkin. The use of twitter by mayors in Turkey: Tweets for better public services? Government Information Quarterly, 30(4):417--425, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Suen. Assessment of the level of interactivity of e-government functions. Journal of E-Government, 3(1):29--51, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Z. Tufekci and C. Wilson. Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62(2):363--379, Apr. 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. J. Viera and J. M. Garrett. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5):360--363, May 2005.Google Scholar
- R. D. Waters and J. Y. Jamal. Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations' Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37(3):321--324, Sept. 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. D. Waters and J. M. Williams. Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter. Journal of Public Affairs, 11(4):353--363, Nov. 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Zhou and T. Wang. Social media: A new vehicle for city marketing in China. Cities, 37:27--32, Apr. 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- An Empirical Analysis of Local Government Social Media Communication: Models of E-government Interactivity and Public Relations
Recommendations
Government social media communications during zika health crisis
dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data AgeWhile the expectation for public officials and government agencies to adopt social media is high, significant questions remain regarding how these tools can be most effectively leveraged to facilitate government communication efforts under crisis ...
Social Media Use by Government in Canada: Examining Interactions of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada on Twitter and Facebook
#SMSociety17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & SocietyIn 2011, the Government of Canada acknowledged the need to use social media to interact with the public for the first time. The Open Dialogue stream of initiatives within the Canada's Action Plan on Open Government called for a two-way dialogue between ...
Using social media to increase e-government adoption in developing countries
ICEGOV '11: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceE-government can be a useful tool for governments to improve relationships with their citizens. However, citizen trust in government and the Internet technology is necessary for broad adoption of e-government. Using a survey, this study examines the ...
Comments