skip to main content
10.1145/2932206.2932213acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimxConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding Video Rewatching Experiences

Published:17 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

New video platforms have enabled a wide variety of opportunities for rewatching video content. From streaming sites such as Netflix, Hulu, and HBO Now, to the proliferation of syndicated content on cable and satellite television, to new streaming devices for the home such as Roku and Apple TV, there are countless ways that people can rewatch movies and television shows. But what are people doing? We set out to understand current rewatching practices across a variety of devices and services. Through an online, open-ended survey to 150 diverse people and in- depth, in-person interviews with 10 participants, we explore current rewatching behaviors. We quantify the types of content that are being rewatched as well as qualitatively explore the reasons and contexts behind rewatching. We conclude with key implications for the design of new video systems to promote rewatching behaviors.

References

  1. Frank R. Bentley and Michael Groble. 2009. TuVista: meeting the multimedia needs of mobile sports fans. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Multimedia (MM '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 471--480. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1631272.1631337 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jenkins, H., et al. (2013). Spreadable media: creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York; London, New York University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kompare, Derek. Rerun nation: How repeats invented American television. Routledge, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kompare, Derek. Reruns 2.0: Revising Repetition for Multiplatform Television Distribution. Journal of Popular Film & Television. Summer 2010, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p79--83Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Metcalf, Greg. The DVD novel: how the way we watch television changed the television we watch. ABCCLIO, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mittell, J. (2015). Complex TV: the poetics of contemporary television storytelling. New York, New York University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mittell, Jason. "Narrative complexity in contemporary American television."The velvet light trap 58.1 (2006): 29--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Janet Murray, Sergio Goldenberg, Kartik Agarwal, Tarun Chakravorty, Jonathan Cutrell, Abraham DorisDown, and Harish Kothandaraman. 2012. Story-map: iPad companion for long form TV narratives. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Interactive tv and video (EuroiTV '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 223--226. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325659 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Janet H. Murray. 2012. Transcending transmedia: emerging story telling structures for the emerging convergence platforms. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Interactive tv and video (EuroiTV '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325618 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Steven Schirra, Huan Sun, and Frank Bentley. 2014. Together alone: motivations for live-tweeting a television series. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2441--2450. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557070 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. David A. Shamma, Lyndon Kennedy, and Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2009. Tweet the debates: understanding community annotation of uncollected sources. In Proceedings of the first SIGMM workshop on Social media (WSM '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--10. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1631144.1631148 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sharma, Amol, An Existential Crisis Hits TV's Rerun Business. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition {New York, N.Y} 20 June 2014: B.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zink, Michael, et al. "Watch global, cache local: YouTube network traffic at a campus network: measurements and implications." Electronic Imaging 2008. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Williams, Phil, "The evolution of the television rerun." Journal of Popular Film & Television, 01956051, Winter 94, Vol. 21, Issue 4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Weispfenning, J, "Cultural functions of reruns: Time, memory, and television" JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, Volume: 53, Issue: 1, Pages: 165--177, MAR 2003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Crysta Metcalf, Gunnar Harboe, Joe Tullio, Noel Massey, Guy Romano, Elaine M. Huang, and Frank Bentley. 2008. Examining presence and lightweight messaging in a social television experience.ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 4, 4, Article 27 (November 2008), 16 pages. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1412196.1412200 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Video Rewatching Experiences

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TVX '16: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video
      June 2016
      202 pages
      ISBN:9781450340670
      DOI:10.1145/2932206

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 June 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      TVX '16 Paper Acceptance Rate12of38submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate69of245submissions,28%

      Upcoming Conference

      IMX '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader