skip to main content
10.1145/2935334.2935380acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Acceptance of mobile technology by older adults: a preliminary study

Published:06 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile technologies offer the potential for enhanced healthcare, especially by supporting self-management of chronic care. For these technologies to impact chronic care, they need to work for older adults, because the majority of people with chronic conditions are older. A major challenge remains: integrating the appropriate use of such technologies into the lives of older adults. We investigated how older adults would accept mobile technologies by interviewing two groups of older adults (technology adopters and non-adopters who aged 60+) about their experiences and perspectives to mobile technologies. Our preliminary results indicate that there is an additional phase, the intention to learn, and three relating factors, self-efficacy, conversion readiness, and peer support, that significantly influence the acceptance of mobile technologies among the participants, but are not represented in the existing models. With these findings, we propose a tentative theoretical model that extends the existing theories to explain the ways in which our participants came to accept mobile technologies. Future work should investigate the validity of the proposed model by testing our findings against younger people.

References

  1. Icek Ajzen. 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50, 2 (1991), 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Anderson. 2015. The demographics of device ownership. Pew Research Center: Washington DC (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Robin Brewer, Raymundo Cornejo Garcia, Tedmond Schwaba, Darren Gergle, and Anne Marie Piper. 2016. Exploring Traditional Phones as an E-Mail Interface for Older Adults. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 8, 2 (2016), 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Luca Buccoliero and Elena Bellio. 2014. The adoption of silver e-Health technologies: first hints on technology acceptance factors for elderly in Italy. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM, 304--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Emil Chiauzzi, Carlos Rodarte, and Pronabesh DasMahapatra. 2015. Patient-centered activity monitoring in the self-management of chronic health conditions. BMC medicine 13, 1 (2015), 77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Miha Cimperman, Maja Makovec Brenčič, Peter Trkman, and Mateja de Leonni Stanonik. 2013. Older adults' perceptions of home telehealth services. Telemedicine and e-Health 19, 10 (2013), 786--790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Adele Clarke. 2005. Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mario Conci, Fabio Pianesi, and Massimo Zancanaro. 2009. Useful, social and enjoyable: Mobile phone adoption by older people. In Human-Computer Interaction--INTERACT 2009. Springer, 63--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fred D. Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly (1989), 319--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Anna Dickinson, Alan F. Newell, Michael J. Smith, and Robin L. Hill. 2005. Introducing the Internet to the over-60s: Developing an email system for older novice computer users. Interacting with Computers 17, 6 (2005), 621--642. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Arthur D. Fisk, Wendy A. Rogers, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, and Joseph Sharit. 2009. Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Helene Gelderblom, Tobie van Dyk, and Judy van Biljon. 2010. Mobile phone adoption: Do existing models adequately capture the actual usage of older adults?. In Proceedings of the 2010 annual research conference of the south african institute of computer scientists and information technologists. ACM, 67--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Nancy M. Gell, Dori E. Rosenberg, George Demiris, Andrea Z. LaCroix, and Kushang V. Patel. 2013. Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities. The Gerontologist (2013), gnt166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mary C. Gilly and Valarie A. Zeithaml. 1985. The elderly consumer and adoption of technologies. Journal of consumer research (1985), 353--357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mark S. Granovetter. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology (1973), 1360--1380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Vicki L. Hanson. 2011. Technology skill and age: what will be the same 20 years from now? Universal Access in the Information Society 10, 4 (2011), 443--452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Zhao Xia Jin, Tom Plocher, and Liana Kiff. 2007. Touch screen user interfaces for older adults: button size and spacing. In Universal acess in human computer interaction. coping with diversity. Springer, 933--941. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sri Kurniawan. 2008. Older people and mobile phones: A multi-method investigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66, 12 (2008), 889--901. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Chaiwoo Lee and Joseph F. Coughlin. 2014. PERSPECTIVE: Older Adults' Adoption of Technology: An Integrated Approach to Identifying Determinants and Barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Carolyn S. Malchodi, Cheryl Oncken, Ellen A Dornelas, Laura Caramanica, Elizabeth Gregonis, and Stephen L. Curry. 2003. The effects of peer counseling on smoking cessation and reduction. Obstetrics & Gynecology 101, 3 (2003), 504--510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Matthew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tracy L. Mitzner, Wendy A. Rogers, Arthur D. Fisk, Walter R. Boot, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, and Joseph Sharit. 2014. Predicting older adults' perceptions about a computer system designed for seniors. Universal Access in the Information Society (2014), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Michael G. Morris and Viswanath Venkatesh. 2000. Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel psychology 53, 2 (2000), 375--403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. H. H. Nap and H. P. de Greef. 2010. Self-efficacy & stress in senior computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. ACM, 227--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Björn Niehaves and Ralf Plattfaut. 2014. Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems 23, 6 (2014), 708--726.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Chee Wei Phang, Juliana Sutanto, Atreyi Kankanhalli, Yan Li, Bernard CY Tan, and Hock-Hai Teo. 2006. Senior citizens' acceptance of information systems: A study in the context of e-government services. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on 53, 4 (2006), 555--569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Karen Renaud and Judy Van Biljon. 2008. Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study. In Proceedings of the 2008 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries: riding the wave of technology. ACM, 210--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Toni Robertson, Tuck W. Leong, Jeannette Durick, and Treffyn Koreshoff. 2014. Mutual learning as a resource for research design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts-Volume 2. ACM, 25--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Mary E. Sesto, Curtis B. Irwin, Karen B. Chen, Amrish O. Chourasia, and Douglas A. Wiegmann. 2012. Effect of touch screen button size and spacing on touch characteristics of users with and without disabilities. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54, 3 (2012), 425--436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Aaron Smith. 2015. US smartphone use in 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/chapter-one-a-portrait-of-smartphone-ownership/, Pew Research Center (2015), 18--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Janan Al-Awar Smither and Curt C. Braun. 1994. Technology and older adults: Factors affecting the adoption of automatic teller machines. The Journal of General Psychology 121, 4 (1994), 381--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1994. Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research (1994), 273--285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Hironobu Takagi, Akihiro Kosugi, Tatsuya Ishihara, and Kentarou Fukuda. 2014. Remote IT education for senior citizens. In Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference. ACM, 41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Keith J. Topping. 2005. Trends in peer learning. Educational psychology 25, 6 (2005), 631--645.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Phil Turner, Susan Turner, and Guy Van de Walle. 2007. How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 26, 4 (2007), 287--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly (2003), 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kerryellen G. Vroman, Sajay Arthanat, and Catherine Lysack. 2015. "Who over 65 is online?" Older adults' dispositions toward information communication technology. Computers in Human Behavior 43 (2015), 156--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Wiktoria Wilkowska and Martina Ziefle. 2009. Which factors form older adults' acceptance of mobile information and communication technologies? Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yurong Yao and Lisa Murphy. 2007. Remote electronic voting systems: an exploration of voters' perceptions and intention to use. European Journal of Information Systems 16, 2 (2007), 106--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Valarie A. Zeithaml and William L. Fuerst. 1983. Age differences in response to grocery store price information. Journal of consumer affairs 17, 2 (1983), 402--420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Acceptance of mobile technology by older adults: a preliminary study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '16: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      September 2016
      567 pages
      ISBN:9781450344081
      DOI:10.1145/2935334

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 September 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader