skip to main content
10.1145/2939672.2939676acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Student Paper

Contextual Intent Tracking for Personal Assistants

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 August 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

A new paradigm of recommendation is emerging in intelligent personal assistants such as Apple's Siri, Google Now, and Microsoft Cortana, which recommends "the right information at the right time" and proactively helps you "get things done". This type of recommendation requires precisely tracking users' contemporaneous intent, i.e., what type of information (e.g., weather, stock prices) users currently intend to know, and what tasks (e.g., playing music, getting taxis) they intend to do. Users' intent is closely related to context, which includes both external environments such as time and location, and users' internal activities that can be sensed by personal assistants. The relationship between context and intent exhibits complicated co-occurring and sequential correlation, and contextual signals are also heterogeneous and sparse, which makes modeling the context intent relationship a challenging task. To solve the intent tracking problem, we propose the Kalman filter regularized PARAFAC2 (KP2) nowcasting model, which compactly represents the structure and co-movement of context and intent. The KP2 model utilizes collaborative capabilities among users, and learns for each user a personalized dynamic system that enables efficient nowcasting of users' intent. Extensive experiments using real-world data sets from a commercial personal assistant show that the KP2 model significantly outperforms various methods, and provides inspiring implications for deploying large-scale proactive recommendation systems in personal assistants.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

kdd2016_sun_personal_assistants_01-acm.mp4

mp4

380.7 MB

References

  1. http://www.google.com/landing/now/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. http://dev.windows.com/en-us/cortana.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. http://www.apple.com/ios/whats-new/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Context-aware recommender systems. In Recommender systems handbook, pages 217--253. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. M. Banbura, D. Giannone, and L. Reichlin. Nowcasting. The Oxford Handbook of Economic Forecasting, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. M. Bell and Y. Koren. Lessons from the netflix prize challenge. KDD Explorations, 9(2):75--79, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Y. Cai, H. Tong, W. Fan, P. Ji, and Q. He. Facets: Fast comprehensive mining of coevolving high-order time series. In KDD, pages 79--88, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. O. Celma. Music recommendation. Springer, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Giannone, L. Reichlin, and D. Small. Nowcasting: The real-time informational content of macroeconomic data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55(4):665--676, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. Guha, V. Gupta, V. Raghunathan, and R. Srikant. User modeling for a personal assistant. In WSDM, pages 275--284, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. A. Harshman. Parafac2: Mathematical and technical notes. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 22(3044):122215, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. Jannach, L. Lerche, and M. Jugovac. Adaptation and evaluation of recommendations for short-term shopping goals. In RecSys, pages 211--218, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Karatzoglou, X. Amatriain, L. Baltrunas, and N. Oliver. Multiverse recommendation: N-dimensional tensor factorization for context-aware collaborative filtering. In RecSys, pages 79--86, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. T. G. Kolda and B. W. Bader. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM review, 51(3):455--500, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Koren. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. In KDD, pages 447--456, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. V. Lampos and N. Cristianini. Nowcasting events from the social web with statistical learning. TIST, 3(4):72, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Q. Liu, H. Ma, E. Chen, and H. Xiong. A survey of context-aware mobile recommendations. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 12(01):139--172, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. R. Magnus, H. Neudecker, et al. Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. R. J. Mooney and L. Roy. Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries, pages 195--204, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Factorizing personalized markov chains for next-basket recommendation. In WWW, pages 811--820, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Shokouhi and Q. Guo. From queries to cards: Re-ranking proactive card recommendations based on reactive search history. In SIGIR, pages 695--704, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Y. Sun, N. J. Yuan, X. Xie, K. McDonald, and R. Zhang. Collaborative nowcasting for contextual recommendation. In WWW, pages 1407--1418, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Z. Wang, P. Chakraborty, S. R. Mekaru, J. S. Brownstein, J. Ye, and N. Ramakrishnan. Dynamic poisson autoregression for influenza-like-illness case count prediction. In KDD, pages 1285--1294, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Y. Zhang, M. Zhang, Y. Zhang, G. Lai, Y. Liu, H. Zhang, and S. Ma. Daily-aware personalized recommendation based on feature-level time series analysis. In WWW, pages 1373--1383, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. H. Zhu, E. Chen, H. Xiong, K. Yu, H. Cao, and J. Tian. Mining mobile user preferences for personalized context-aware recommendation. TIST, 5(4):58, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Contextual Intent Tracking for Personal Assistants

                            Recommendations

                            Comments

                            Login options

                            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                            Sign in
                            • Published in

                              cover image ACM Conferences
                              KDD '16: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
                              August 2016
                              2176 pages
                              ISBN:9781450342322
                              DOI:10.1145/2939672

                              Copyright © 2016 ACM

                              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                              Publisher

                              Association for Computing Machinery

                              New York, NY, United States

                              Publication History

                              • Published: 13 August 2016

                              Permissions

                              Request permissions about this article.

                              Request Permissions

                              Check for updates

                              Qualifiers

                              • research-article

                              Acceptance Rates

                              KDD '16 Paper Acceptance Rate66of1,115submissions,6%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

                            PDF Format

                            View or Download as a PDF file.

                            PDF

                            eReader

                            View online with eReader.

                            eReader