skip to main content
research-article

Relative Discrepancy Does Not Separate Information and Communication Complexity

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 December 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Does the information complexity of a function equal its communication complexity? We examine whether any currently known techniques might be used to show a separation between the two notions. Ganor et al. [2014] recently provided such a separation in the distributional case for a specific input distribution. We show that in the non-distributional setting, the relative discrepancy bound is smaller than the information complexity; hence, it cannot separate information and communication complexity. In addition, in the distributional case, we provide a linear program formulation for relative discrepancy and relate it to variants of the partition bound, resolving also an open question regarding the relation of the partition bound and information complexity. Last, we prove the equivalence between the adaptive relative discrepancy and the public-coin partition, implying that the logarithm of the adaptive relative discrepancy bound is quadratically tight with respect to communication.

References

  1. Ziv Bar-Yossef, T. S. Jayram, Ravi Kumar, and D. Sivakumar. 2004. An information statistics approach to data stream and communication complexity. J. Comput. System Sci. 68, 4 (2004), 702--732. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Boaz Barak, Mark Braverman, Xi Chen, and Anup Rao. 2010. How to compress interactive communication. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mark Braverman. 2012. Interactive information complexity. In Proceedings of the 44th Symposium on Theory of Computing. 505--524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mark Braverman and Anup Rao. 2014. Information equals amortized communication. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 60, 10 (2014), 6058--6069. Early version appeared in FOCS, pages 748--757, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Amit Chakrabarti, Anthony Wirth, Andrew Yao, and Yaoyun Shi. 2001. Informational complexity and the direct sum problem for simultaneous message complexity. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 270--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas. 1991. Elements of Information Theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York. 542 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. M. Fano. 1949. The Transmission of Information. Technical Report 65. Research Laboratory for Electronics, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Anat Ganor, Gillat Kol, and Ran Raz. 2014a. Exponential separation of information and communication. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity 21 (2014), 49. Retrieved from http://eccc.hpi-web.de/report/2014/049.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Anat Ganor, Gillat Kol, and Ran Raz. 2014b. Exponential separation of information and communication for boolean functions. In Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Vol. 113. Retrieved from http://eccc.hpi-web.de/report/2014/113/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Anat Ganor, Gillat Kol, and Ran Raz. 2016. Exponential separation of communication and external information. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, 977--986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dmitry Gavinsky and Shachar Lovett. 2014. En route to the log-rank conjecture: New reductions and equivalent formulations. In Proceedings of the 41st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming. 514--524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Prahladh Harsha, Rahul Jain, David A. McAllester, and Jaikumar Radhakrishnan. 2007. The communication complexity of correlation. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity. 10--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rahul Jain and Hartmut Klauck. 2010. The partition bound for classical communication complexity and query complexity. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity. 1--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rahul Jain, Troy Lee, and Nisheeth K. Vishnoi. 2014. A quadratically tight partition bound for classical communication complexity and query complexity. CoRR abs/1401.4512 (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rahul Jain, Jaikumar Radhakrishnan, and Pranab Sen. 2003. A direct sum theorem in communication complexity via message compression. In Proceedings of the 30th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming. 300--315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rahul Jain, Jaikumar Radhakrishnan, and Pranab Sen. 2008. Optimal direct sum and privacy trade-off results for quantum and classical communication complexity. CoRR abs/0807.1267 (2008), 285--296. http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1267.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Iordanis Kerenidis, Sophie Laplante, Virginie Lerays, Jérémie Roland, and David Xiao. 2012. Lower bounds on information complexity via zero-communication protocols and applications. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 500--509. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Claude E. Shannon. 1948. A mathematical theory of computation. The Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379--423, 623--656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Andrew Chi-Chih Yao. 1979. Some complexity questions related to distributive computing (preliminary report). In Proceedings of the 11h Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 209--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Andrew Chi-Chih Yao. 1983. Lower bounds by probabilistic arguments. In 24th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 420--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Relative Discrepancy Does Not Separate Information and Communication Complexity

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Computation Theory
        ACM Transactions on Computation Theory  Volume 9, Issue 1
        March 2017
        118 pages
        ISSN:1942-3454
        EISSN:1942-3462
        DOI:10.1145/3007903
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 December 2016
        • Accepted: 1 July 2016
        • Revised: 1 June 2016
        • Received: 1 December 2015
        Published in toct Volume 9, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader