skip to main content
10.1145/2970930.2970963acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

How to Design Internet of Things to Encourage Office Workers to Take More Regular Micro-Breaks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Prolonged sitting at work has become a new health hazard for office workers. The current PhD is thus dedicated to exploring the potential of Internet of Things (IoT) for supporting healthier office work and break routines. An "enchanted object" approach that utilizes the "glanceability" and "gesturability" of everyday artefacts is proposed as a potential solution to tackle the challenge of user disturbance and scarcity of cognitive resources in this persuasion context. The vision is to eventually have a collection of digitally "enchanted" office objects that harness ubiquitous sensing and context-aware algorithms to subtly prompt different types of breaks at opportune moments throughout workdays, as a mechanism to break up prolonged sitting; in addition, behavioural data captured from embedded and wearable sensors will be visualized to facilitate self-reflection and habit development. An initial qualitative study is being conducted to unpack challenges and opportunities in reducing prolonged sitting in office work through the lens of both behaviour change and Human Computer Interaction, which has led to preliminary insights to share and discuss with the audience.

References

  1. Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M. and Tice, D.M. 1998. Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? Journal of personality and social psychology. 74, 5 (1998), 1252--1265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. French, S.D., Green, S.E., O'Connor, D.A., McKenzie, J.E., Francis, J.J., Michie, S., Buchbinder, R., Schattner, P., Spike, N. and Grimshaw, J.M. 2012. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implementation science: IS. 7, 1 (Jan. 2012), 38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Healy, G.N., Dunstan, D.W., Salmon, J., Cerin, E., Shaw, J.E., Zimmet, P.Z. and Owen, N. 2008. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes care. 31, 4 (Apr. 2008), 661--666.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Intille, S. 2002. Designing a home of the future. IEEE Pervasive Computing. 1, (2002), 76--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Maguire, M. 2001. Methods to support human-centred design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 55, (2001), 587--634. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M.P., Cane, J. and Wood, C.E. 2013. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 46, 1 (2013), 81--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Michie, S., van Stralen, M.M. and West, R. 2011. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation science: IS. 6, 1 (2011), 42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Norman, D. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nosek, B. a, Hawkins, C.B. and Frazier, R.S. 2011. Implicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms. Trends in cognitive sciences. 15, 4 (Apr. 2011), 152--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. 2010. Behavior change support systems: A research model and agenda. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2010. (2010), 4--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Pate, R.R., O'Neill, J.R. and Lobelo, F. 2008. The evolving definition of "sedentary". Exercise and sport sciences reviews. 36, 4 (2008), 173--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rose, D. 2014. Enchanted Objects: Design, Human Desire, and the Internet of Things. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ryan, C.G., Dall, P.M., Granat, M.H. and Grant, P.M. 2011. Sitting patterns at work: objective measurement of adherence to current recommendations. Ergonomics. 54, 6 (2011), 531--538.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Swanson, N.G. and Sauter, S.L. 1990. The design of rest breaks for video display terminal work: A review of the relavant literature. Journal of Safety Research. 21, (1990), 166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tremblay, M.S., Colley, R.C., Saunders, T.J., Healy, G.N. and Owen, N. 2010. Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 35, 6 (2010), 725--740.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Webb, T.L., Joseph, J., Yardley, L. and Michie, S. 2010. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. Journal of medical Internet research. 12, 1 (Jan. 2010), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ECCE '16: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
    September 2016
    193 pages
    ISBN:9781450342445
    DOI:10.1145/2970930

    Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 September 2016

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    ECCE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate27of37submissions,73%Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader