skip to main content
10.1145/2971648.2971649acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Looking back on the current day: interruptibility prediction using daily behavioral features

Published:12 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

When a person seeks another person's attention, it is of prime importance to assess how interruptible the other person is. Since smartphones are ubiquitously used as communication media these days, interruptibility prediction on smartphones has started to attract great interest from both academia and industry. Previous studies, in general, attempted to model interruptibility using the behaviors at the current moment and in the immediate past (e.g., 5 minutes before). However, a person's interruptibility at a certain moment is indeed affected by his/her preceding behaviors for several reasons. Motivated by this long-term effect, in this paper we propose a novel methodology of extracting features based on past behaviors from smartphone sensor data. The primary difference from previous studies is that we systematically consider a longer history of up to a day in addition to the current point and the immediate past. To represent behaviors in a day accurately and compactly, our methodology divides a day into multiple timeslots and then, for each timeslot, derives relevant features such as the temporal shapes of the time series of the sensor data. In order to verify the advantage of our methodology, we collected a data set of smartphone usage from 25 participants for four weeks and obtained a license to a large-scale public data set constructed from 907 users over approximately nine months. The experimental results on the two data sets show that looking back to the beginning of the current day improves prediction accuracy by up to 16% and 7%, respectively, compared with the baseline and state-of-the-art methods.

References

  1. Christopher Beedie, Peter Terry, and Andrew Lane. 2005. Distinctions between Emotion and Mood. Cognition and Emotion 19, 6 (2005), 847--878.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. C. Sidney Burrus, Ramesh A. Gopinath, and Haitao Guo. 1997. Introduction to Wavelets and Wavelet Transforms. Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pimwadee Chaovalit, Aryya Gangopadhyay, George Karabatis, and Zhiyuan Chen. 2011. Discrete Wavelet Transform-Based Time Series Analysis and Mining. Comput. Surveys 43, 2 (2011), 6:1--6:37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Minsoo Choy, Jae-Gil Lee, Gahgene Gweon, and Daehoon Kim. 2014. Glaucus: Exploiting the Wisdom of Crowds for Location-Based Queries in Mobile Environments. In Proc. 8th Int'l Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Thomas H. Davenport and John C. Beck. 2002. The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business. Harvard Business Review Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Anind K. Dey, Katarzyna Wac, Denzil Ferreira, Kevin Tassini, Jin-Hyuk Hong, and Julian Ramos. 2011. Getting Closer: An Empirical Investigation of the Proximity of User to Their Smart Phones. In Proc. 2011 ACM Int'l Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Usama M. Fayyad and Keki B. Irani. 1993. Multi-Interval Discretization of Continuous-Valued Attributes for Classification Learning. In Proc. 13th Int'l Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. 1022--1027.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. James Fogarty, Scott E. Hudson, Christopher G. Atkeson, Daniel Avrahami, Jodi Forlizzi, Sara Kiesler, Johnny C. Lee, and Jie Yang. 2005. Predicting Human Interruptibility with Sensors. ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction 12, 1 (2005), 119--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bernard Guerin. 2016. How to Rethink Psychology: New Metaphors for Understanding People and Their Behavior. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mark A. Hall. 1999. Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Joyce Ho and Stephen S. Intille. 2004. Using Context-Aware Computing to Reduce the Perceived Burden of Interruptions from Mobile Devices. In Proc. 19th ACM Int'l Conf. on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 507--510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eric Horvitz and Johnson Apacible. 2003. Learning and Reasoning about Interruption. In Proc. 5th Int'l Conf. on Multimodal Interfaces. 20--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Eric Horvitz, Paul Koch, and Johnson Apacible. 2004. BusyBody: Creating and Fielding Personalized Models of the Cost of Interruption. In Proc. 19th ACM Int'l Conf. on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 507--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Scott Hudson, James Fogarty, Christopher Atkeson, Daniel Avrahami, Jodi Forlizzi, Sara Kiesler, Johnny Lee, and Jie Yang. 2003. Predicting Human Interruptibility with Sensors: A Wizard of Oz Feasibility Study. In Proc. 2003 SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 257--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nicky Kern, Stavros Antifakos, Bernt Schiele, and Adrian Schwaninger. 2004. A Model for Human Interruptability: Experimental Evaluation and Automatic Estimation from Wearable Sensors. In Proc. 8th IEEE Int'l Sympo. on Wearable Computers. 158--165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Traci Mann, Denise de Ridder, and Kentaro Fujita. 2013. Self-Regulation of Health Behavior: Social Psychological Approaches to Goal Setting and Goal Striving. Health Psychology 32, 5 (2013), 487--498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Abhinav Mehrotra, Mirco Musolesi, Robert Hendley, and Veljko Pejovic. 2015. Designing Content-driven Intelligent Notification Mechanisms for Mobile Applications. In Proc. 2015 ACM Int'l Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 813--824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Tadashi Okoshi, Julian Ramos, Hiroki Nozaki, Jin Nakazawa, Anind K. Dey, and Hideyuki Tokuda. 2015. Reducing Users' Perceived Mental Effort due to Interruptive Notifications in Multi-Device Mobile Environments. In Proc. 2015 ACM Int'l Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 475--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Veljko Pejovic and Mirco Musolesi. 2014. InterruptMe: Designing Intelligent Prompting Mechanisms for Pervasive Applications. In Proc. 2014 ACM Int'l Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 897--908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Veljko Pejovic and Mirco Musolesi. 2015. Anticipatory Mobile Computing: A Survey of the State of the Art and Research Challenges. Comput. Surveys 47, 3 (2015), 47:1--47:29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Martin Pielot. 2014. Large-Scale Evaluation of Call-Availability Prediction. In Proc. 2014 ACM Int'l Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 933--937. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Martin Pielot, Rodrigo de Oliveira, Haewoon Kwak, and Nuria Oliver. 2014. Didn't You See My Message?: Predicting Attentiveness to Mobile Instant Messages. In Proc. 2014 SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3319--3328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Martin Pielot, Tilman Dingler, Jose San Pedro, and Nuria Oliver. 2015. When Attention is not Scarce - Detecting Boredom from Mobile Phone Usage. In Proc. 2015 ACM Int'l Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 825--836. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Antti Salovaara, Antti Lindqvist, Tero Hasu, and Jonna Hakkila. 2011. The Phone Rings But the User Doesn't Answer: Unavailability in Mobile Communication. In Proc. 13th Int'l Conf. on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 503--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hillol Sarker, Moushumi Sharmin, Amin Ahsan Ali, Md. Mahbubur Rahman, Rummana Bari, Syed Monowar Hossain, and Santosh Kumar. 2014. Assessing the Availability of Users to Engage in Just-in-Time Intervention in the Natural Environment. In Proc. 2014 ACM Int'l Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 909--920. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Choonsung Shin, Jin-Hyuk Hong, and Anind K. Dey. 2012. Understanding and Prediction of Mobile Application Usage for Smart Phones. In Proc. 2012 ACM Int'l Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Chaoming Song, Zehui Qu, Nicholas Blumm, and Albert-László Barabási. 2010. Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility. Science 327, 5968 (2010), 1018--1021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Vijay Srinivasan, Saeed Moghaddam, Abhishek Mukherji, Kiran K. Rachuri, Chenren Xu, and Emmanuel Munguia Tapia. 2014. MobileMiner: Mining Your Frequent Patterns on Your Phone. In Proc. 2014 ACM Int'l Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 389--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Eric J. Stollnitz, Tony D. DeRose, and David H. Salesin. 1995. Wavelets for Computer Graphics: A Primer, Part 1. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 15, 3 (1995), 76--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Liam D. Turner, Stuart M. Allen, and Roger M. Whitaker. 2015. Interruptibility Prediction for Ubiquitous Systems: Conventions and New Directions from a Growing Field. In Proc. 2015 ACM Int'l Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 801--812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Daniel Wagner, Andrew Rice, and Alastair Beresford. 2013. Device Analyzer: Understanding Smartphone Usage. In Proc. 10th Int'l Conf. on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services. 195--208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Yi-Leh Wu, Divyakant Agrawal, and Amr El Abbadi. 2000. A Comparison of DFT and DWT Based Similarity Search in Time-Series Databases. In Proc. 9th Int'l Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management. 488--495. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kazuo Yano. 2014. Invisible Hand of Data. Soshisha.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Looking back on the current day: interruptibility prediction using daily behavioral features

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
      September 2016
      1288 pages
      ISBN:9781450344616
      DOI:10.1145/2971648

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 September 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UbiComp '16 Paper Acceptance Rate101of389submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader