skip to main content
10.1145/2987386.2987420acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesracsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enhanced Breast Cancer Classification with Automatic Thresholding Using SVM and Harris Corner Detection

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Image classification and extracting the characteristics of a tumor are the powerful tools in medical science. In case of breast cancer medical treatment, the breast cancer classification methods can be used to classify input images as normal and abnormal classes for better diagnoses and earlier detection with breast tumors. However, classification process can be challenging because of the existence of noise in the images, and complicated structures of the image. Manual classification of the images is time-consuming, and need to be done only by medical experts. Hence using an automated medical image classification tool is useful and necessary. In addition, having a better training data set directly affect the quality of classification process. In this paper, a method is proposed based on supervised learning and automatic thresholding for both generating better training data set, and more accurate classification of the mammogram images into Normal/Abnormal classes. The procedure consists of preprocessing, removing noise, elimination of unwanted objects, features extraction, and classification. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) is used as the supervised model in two phases which are testing and training. Intensity value, auto-correlation matrix value of detected corners, and, energy, are three extracted features used to train the SVM. Experimental results show this method classify images with more accuracy and less execution time compared to existing method.

References

  1. Cancer Statistics Center. Available: https://cancerstatisticscenter.cancer.org/?_ga=1.242628866.1838802877.1464045043#/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson. C. C., Kumar Rajamani, Lajish V. L. (2015). A Review on Automatic Marker Identification Methods in Watershed Algorithms Used for Medical Image Segmentation. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 2(9).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Navdeep Kumar, Sugandha Arora. (2012). Medical Evaluation of Marker Controlled Watershed Technique for Detecting Brain Tumors. International Journal of Computer Applications, 54(11), 11--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. R. H. Chan, Chung-Wa Ho, M. Nikolova. (2005). Salt-and-pepper noise removal by median-type noise detectors and detail-preserving regularization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 14(10), 1479--1485. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Priyanka Jagya, R.B. Dubey. (2015). Comparison of Two Segmentation Methods for Mammographic Image. International Journal of Computer Applications, 126(1), 31--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Samaneh Aminikhanghahi, Wei Wang, Sung Shin, Seong H. Son, Soon I. Jeon. (2014). Effective Tumor Feature Extraction for Smart Phone Based Microwave Tomography Breast Cancer Screening. Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 674--679. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Alpaydin, Ethem. (2004). Introduction to Machine Learning, Second Edition, MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tu, Jack V. (1996). Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(11), 1225--1231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nello Cristianini, John Shawe-Taylor. (2000). An Introduction To Support Vector Machines and other kernel-based learning methods, Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hyun I. Kim, Sung Shin, Wei Wang, Soon I. Jeon. (2013). SVM-based Harris corner detection for breast mammogram image normal/abnormal classification. RACS '13 Proceedings of the 2013 Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems, 187--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wadhwani, S., Wadhwani, A.K. and Saraswat, M. (2013). Classification of Breast Cancer Detection Using Artificial Neural Networks. Engineering, Science and Technology, 1(3), 85--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. C. y. Ning, S. f. Liu and M. Qu. (2009). Research on removing noise in medical image based on median filter method. IT in Medicine & Education. ITIME '09. IEEE International Symposium on, 1, 384--388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. H. Hwang, R. A. Haddad. (1995). Adaptive median filters: New algorithms and results. IEEE Transactions on Image Proccesing, 4(4), 499--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Indra Kanta Maitra, Sanjay Nag, Samir Kumar Bandyopadhyay. (2012). Technique for preprocessing of digital mammogram. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 107(2), 175--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rafael C. Gonzalez, Richard E. Woods.. (2008). Digital Image Processing (3rd Edition). Pearson Prentice-Hall, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gulzar A. Khuwaja, A. N. Abu-Rezq. (2004). Bi-modal breast cancer classification system. Pattern Analysis & Applications, 7(3), 235--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Khuwaja, G.A. (2002). An Adaptive Combined Classifier System for Invariant Face Recognition. Digital Signal Processing, 12(1), 21--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Chris Harris, Mike Stephens. (1998). A Combined Corner and Edge Detector. In Proc. of Fourth Alvey Vision Conference, 147--151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, C. (1993). Geometry from visual motion. Active vision, 263--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. W. Ridler, S. Calvard. (1978). Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 8(8), 630--632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ramachandram, Dhanesh. Automatic Thresholding. Available: http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFile.do?objectId=3195&objectType=file.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Chulwoo Pack, Sung Shin, Seong H.Son, and, Soon I. Jeon. (2015). Computer aided breast cancer diagnosis system with fuzzy multiple-parameter support vector machine. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on research in adaptive and convergent systems, (172--176). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Olson, David L., Delen, Dursun. (2008). Advanced Data Mining Techniques. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Enhanced Breast Cancer Classification with Automatic Thresholding Using SVM and Harris Corner Detection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      RACS '16: Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems
      October 2016
      266 pages
      ISBN:9781450344555
      DOI:10.1145/2987386

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      RACS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate40of161submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,581submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader