ABSTRACT
Image classification and extracting the characteristics of a tumor are the powerful tools in medical science. In case of breast cancer medical treatment, the breast cancer classification methods can be used to classify input images as normal and abnormal classes for better diagnoses and earlier detection with breast tumors. However, classification process can be challenging because of the existence of noise in the images, and complicated structures of the image. Manual classification of the images is time-consuming, and need to be done only by medical experts. Hence using an automated medical image classification tool is useful and necessary. In addition, having a better training data set directly affect the quality of classification process. In this paper, a method is proposed based on supervised learning and automatic thresholding for both generating better training data set, and more accurate classification of the mammogram images into Normal/Abnormal classes. The procedure consists of preprocessing, removing noise, elimination of unwanted objects, features extraction, and classification. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) is used as the supervised model in two phases which are testing and training. Intensity value, auto-correlation matrix value of detected corners, and, energy, are three extracted features used to train the SVM. Experimental results show this method classify images with more accuracy and less execution time compared to existing method.
- Cancer Statistics Center. Available: https://cancerstatisticscenter.cancer.org/?_ga=1.242628866.1838802877.1464045043#/.Google Scholar
- Benson. C. C., Kumar Rajamani, Lajish V. L. (2015). A Review on Automatic Marker Identification Methods in Watershed Algorithms Used for Medical Image Segmentation. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 2(9).Google Scholar
- Navdeep Kumar, Sugandha Arora. (2012). Medical Evaluation of Marker Controlled Watershed Technique for Detecting Brain Tumors. International Journal of Computer Applications, 54(11), 11--13.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. H. Chan, Chung-Wa Ho, M. Nikolova. (2005). Salt-and-pepper noise removal by median-type noise detectors and detail-preserving regularization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 14(10), 1479--1485. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Priyanka Jagya, R.B. Dubey. (2015). Comparison of Two Segmentation Methods for Mammographic Image. International Journal of Computer Applications, 126(1), 31--43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Samaneh Aminikhanghahi, Wei Wang, Sung Shin, Seong H. Son, Soon I. Jeon. (2014). Effective Tumor Feature Extraction for Smart Phone Based Microwave Tomography Breast Cancer Screening. Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 674--679. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alpaydin, Ethem. (2004). Introduction to Machine Learning, Second Edition, MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tu, Jack V. (1996). Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(11), 1225--1231.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nello Cristianini, John Shawe-Taylor. (2000). An Introduction To Support Vector Machines and other kernel-based learning methods, Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hyun I. Kim, Sung Shin, Wei Wang, Soon I. Jeon. (2013). SVM-based Harris corner detection for breast mammogram image normal/abnormal classification. RACS '13 Proceedings of the 2013 Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems, 187--191. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wadhwani, S., Wadhwani, A.K. and Saraswat, M. (2013). Classification of Breast Cancer Detection Using Artificial Neural Networks. Engineering, Science and Technology, 1(3), 85--91.Google Scholar
- C. y. Ning, S. f. Liu and M. Qu. (2009). Research on removing noise in medical image based on median filter method. IT in Medicine & Education. ITIME '09. IEEE International Symposium on, 1, 384--388.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Hwang, R. A. Haddad. (1995). Adaptive median filters: New algorithms and results. IEEE Transactions on Image Proccesing, 4(4), 499--502. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Indra Kanta Maitra, Sanjay Nag, Samir Kumar Bandyopadhyay. (2012). Technique for preprocessing of digital mammogram. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 107(2), 175--188. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rafael C. Gonzalez, Richard E. Woods.. (2008). Digital Image Processing (3rd Edition). Pearson Prentice-Hall, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gulzar A. Khuwaja, A. N. Abu-Rezq. (2004). Bi-modal breast cancer classification system. Pattern Analysis & Applications, 7(3), 235--242. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khuwaja, G.A. (2002). An Adaptive Combined Classifier System for Invariant Face Recognition. Digital Signal Processing, 12(1), 21--46.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chris Harris, Mike Stephens. (1998). A Combined Corner and Edge Detector. In Proc. of Fourth Alvey Vision Conference, 147--151.Google Scholar
- Harris, C. (1993). Geometry from visual motion. Active vision, 263--284. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. W. Ridler, S. Calvard. (1978). Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 8(8), 630--632.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ramachandram, Dhanesh. Automatic Thresholding. Available: http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFile.do?objectId=3195&objectType=file.Google Scholar
- Chulwoo Pack, Sung Shin, Seong H.Son, and, Soon I. Jeon. (2015). Computer aided breast cancer diagnosis system with fuzzy multiple-parameter support vector machine. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on research in adaptive and convergent systems, (172--176). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, David L., Delen, Dursun. (2008). Advanced Data Mining Techniques. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Enhanced Breast Cancer Classification with Automatic Thresholding Using SVM and Harris Corner Detection
Recommendations
Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors in Ultrasound Images Based on Multiple Sonographic and Textural Features
IHMSC '11: Proceedings of the 2011 Third International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics - Volume 01We establish a new set of features for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions using ultrasound (US) images. Two types of features (sonographic and textural features) are considered. Among them, three sonographic features are novel. ...
Breast cancer classification of mammographic masses using improved shape features
RACS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on research in adaptive and convergent systemsBreast cancer classification technique divides breast cancer into two categories, benign tumors and malignant tumors. The main purpose of breast cancer classification is to classify abnormalities into benign or malignant classes and thus help physicians ...
Classification of breast tissues using Moran's index and Geary's coefficient as texture signatures and SVM
Female breast cancer is the major cause of cancer-related deaths in western countries. Efforts in computer vision have been made in order to help improving the diagnostic accuracy by radiologists. In this paper, we present a methodology that uses Moran'...
Comments