- Armstrong, J. and Conrad, L. (1995) Subject Evaluation: A Resource Book for Improving Learning and Teaching. GIHE, Griffith University, Queensland, 4111, Australia.Google Scholar
- Baird, J.R. (1988) Quality: What should make higher education 'higher'? Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 141-152.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Coate, E. (1993) The introduction of Total Quality Management at Oregon State University. Higher Education, Vol. 25, pp. 303-320.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Collier, K.G. (1985) Teaching methods in higher education: The changing scene, with special reference to small-group work. Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 4, No. 1, PP. 3-27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cuttance, P. (1993) Quality Assurance and Quality Management: Complementary but different functions. Sydney: Quality Assurance Directorate, NSW Department of School Education.Google Scholar
- Cuttance, P. (1994) Quality assurance in education systems. Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 20, pp. 99-112.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deming, W.E. (1986) Out ofthe Crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Ellis, R. (1993) The management of quality in the University of Ulster. Higher Education, Vol. 25, pp. 239-257.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ferrier, F. (1993) Assessment of Students: A Resource Booklet. HEARU, Monash University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Fraser, B.J. (1986) Differences between students' and instructors' perceptions of actual and preferred classroom environment in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 191-199.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gilbert, J.P., Kay, L.K., and Simpson, R.D. (1993) Improving the process of education: Total Quality Management for the college classroom. Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 65-85.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hansen, W.L. (1993) Bringing Total Quality Improvement into the college classroom. Higher Education, Vol. 25, pp. 259-279.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harey, L. and Green D.(1993) Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 9-34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Liao, Y.-K. C. and Bright, G.W. (1991) Effects of computer programming on cognitive uutcume~: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing ~aeD~rr/~ Vnl '7 NIn "~ nr~ 9~1_9~RGoogle Scholar
- Maheshwari, P. (1996) Assessing students to diagnose difficulties in learning various programming paradigms and languages. Proc. 1st Australasian Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maheshwari, P. (1997) Improving the learning environment in first-year programming: integrating lectures, tutorials and laboratories. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1997, pp. 111-131. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Murgatroyd, S. and Morgon, C. (1993) Total Quality Management and the School. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Oliver, N. (1993) Quality, costs and changing strategies of control in universities in the UK. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 41- 52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ramsden, P. (1985) Student learning research" Retrospect ~nd nrn~nPt't {-{;oha r l~fhl~t/,~, l~ can rrh 171,7,,'{ Development, Vol. 4, No. l, pp. 51-69.Google Scholar
- Ramsden, P. (1~2) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London" Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tribus, M.T. (1993) Quality management in education. Journal for Quality and Participation, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 12-21.Google Scholar
- Volet, S.E. (1991) Modelling and coaching of relevant metacognitive strategies for enhancing university students' learning. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 1, pp. 319-336.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ~Watkins, D.(1985 ) How students explain therir acadimic performance, Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 89-93.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Watt, D.A. (1990) Programming Language Concepts and ruruatgma, rrenuc~ rana~ xnttzsn~.uut~ti (used as the textbook in the subject under study) Google ScholarDigital Library
- Williams, G. (1993) Total quality management in higher education" panacea or placebo? Higher Education, Vol. 23, pp. ZZb~-Z3/.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J.D. (1988) Appraising Teaching Quality. London, England: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Teaching programming paradigms and languages for qualitative learning
Recommendations
The role of language paradigms in teaching programming
The purpose of this panel is to confront the wide variety of opinions on the role of language paradigms in teaching programming. We have selected four divergent opinions:
- Armstrong says that concurrent programming is considered difficult because it is ...
Teaching Programming Paradigms Using CLIPS
Papers of the 29th Annual CCSC Midwestern ConferenceCLIPS is an expert system shell, originally developed at NASA. In universities, it is often used in courses in Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems and projects for building expert systems. I believe it can be used effectively in courses in ...
Teaching programming using scripting languages
This paper looks at the potential for using scripting languages to teach programming. It demonstrates that the so-called "system programming languages" such as Java and C++ are not suitable to teaching novices. Conversely the modern "scripting languages"...
Comments