skip to main content
10.1145/299359.299365acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesaus-ceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Teaching programming paradigms and languages for qualitative learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 July 1997Publication History
First page image

References

  1. Armstrong, J. and Conrad, L. (1995) Subject Evaluation: A Resource Book for Improving Learning and Teaching. GIHE, Griffith University, Queensland, 4111, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird, J.R. (1988) Quality: What should make higher education 'higher'? Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 141-152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Coate, E. (1993) The introduction of Total Quality Management at Oregon State University. Higher Education, Vol. 25, pp. 303-320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Collier, K.G. (1985) Teaching methods in higher education: The changing scene, with special reference to small-group work. Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 4, No. 1, PP. 3-27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cuttance, P. (1993) Quality Assurance and Quality Management: Complementary but different functions. Sydney: Quality Assurance Directorate, NSW Department of School Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cuttance, P. (1994) Quality assurance in education systems. Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 20, pp. 99-112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Deming, W.E. (1986) Out ofthe Crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellis, R. (1993) The management of quality in the University of Ulster. Higher Education, Vol. 25, pp. 239-257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ferrier, F. (1993) Assessment of Students: A Resource Booklet. HEARU, Monash University, Melbourne.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fraser, B.J. (1986) Differences between students' and instructors' perceptions of actual and preferred classroom environment in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 191-199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gilbert, J.P., Kay, L.K., and Simpson, R.D. (1993) Improving the process of education: Total Quality Management for the college classroom. Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 65-85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Hansen, W.L. (1993) Bringing Total Quality Improvement into the college classroom. Higher Education, Vol. 25, pp. 259-279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Harey, L. and Green D.(1993) Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 9-34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Liao, Y.-K. C. and Bright, G.W. (1991) Effects of computer programming on cognitive uutcume~: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing ~aeD~rr/~ Vnl '7 NIn "~ nr~ 9~1_9~RGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Maheshwari, P. (1996) Assessing students to diagnose difficulties in learning various programming paradigms and languages. Proc. 1st Australasian Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Maheshwari, P. (1997) Improving the learning environment in first-year programming: integrating lectures, tutorials and laboratories. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1997, pp. 111-131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Murgatroyd, S. and Morgon, C. (1993) Total Quality Management and the School. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Oliver, N. (1993) Quality, costs and changing strategies of control in universities in the UK. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 41- 52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ramsden, P. (1985) Student learning research" Retrospect ~nd nrn~nPt't {-{;oha r l~fhl~t/,~, l~ can rrh 171,7,,'{ Development, Vol. 4, No. l, pp. 51-69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ramsden, P. (1~2) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London" Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tribus, M.T. (1993) Quality management in education. Journal for Quality and Participation, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 12-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Volet, S.E. (1991) Modelling and coaching of relevant metacognitive strategies for enhancing university students' learning. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 1, pp. 319-336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. ~Watkins, D.(1985 ) How students explain therir acadimic performance, Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 89-93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Watt, D.A. (1990) Programming Language Concepts and ruruatgma, rrenuc~ rana~ xnttzsn~.uut~ti (used as the textbook in the subject under study) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Williams, G. (1993) Total quality management in higher education" panacea or placebo? Higher Education, Vol. 23, pp. ZZb~-Z3/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson, J.D. (1988) Appraising Teaching Quality. London, England: Hodder and Stoughton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Teaching programming paradigms and languages for qualitative learning

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ACSE '97: Proceedings of the 2nd Australasian conference on Computer science education
          July 1997
          231 pages
          ISBN:0897919580
          DOI:10.1145/299359

          Copyright © 1997 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 July 1997

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate161of359submissions,45%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader