skip to main content
10.1145/2994310.2994339acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interactive dome experiences: designing astrosurf

Published:17 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Dome and display technology have evolved to the point that designing interactive dome experiences no longer requires expertise with dome technology. In particular, the DomeLab provides an interface for designers to work with popular game development technology, such as Unity. Without the technologic concerns of developing the domes themselves, research can shift focus towards designing games and novel experiences for them. This raises new questions: "what kind of interactive experiences can domes support?" and "how can these experiences be designed for?" Through the design and evaluation of AstroSurf, a game designed for the DomeLab, this paper contributes three themes: co-location in the dome context, interacting with dome interfaces, and designing for exhibition. These themes present an argument for designing 'enveloping experiences' for domes and identify domes as a unique immersive environment supporting drop-in play, converged multiplayer interactions around the pole, and blended physical-virtual play.

References

  1. K. Battarbee. Co-experience: the social user experience. In CHI'03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 730--731. ACM, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. T. Bekker, J. Sturm, and B. Eggen. Designing playful interactions for social interaction and physical play. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14(5):385--396, July 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Björk, D. Eriksson, J. Holopainen, and J. Peitz. D9.1 Guidelines for Socially Adaptable Games, Dec. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Bourke. Spherical mirror: a new approach to hemispherical dome projection. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australasia and South East Asia, pages 281--284. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Caillois and M. Barash. Man, play, and games. University of Illinois Press, 1961.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. P. Chastenay. From Geocentrism to Allocentrism: Teaching the Phases of the Moon in a Digital Full-Dome Planetarium. Research in Science Education, 46(1):43--77, Feb. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. Cruz-Neira, D. J. Sandin, and T. A. DeFanti. Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: the design and implementation of the cave. In Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 135--142. ACM, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Davis, K. Nesbitt, and E. Nalivaiko. A systematic review of cybersickness. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment, pages 1--9. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Downs, F. Vetere, S. Howard, S. Loughnan, and W. Smith. Audience experience in social videogaming: effects of turn expectation and game physicality. pages 3473--3482. ACM Press, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fulldome.pro. Earth patrol. http://www.fddb.org/earth-patrol-a-360-video-game-by-fulldome-pro/, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Gaitatzes, G. Papaioannou, D. Christopoulos, and G. Zyba. Media productions for a dome display system. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, pages 261--264. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Giant Bomb. Endless Runner (Concept). http://www.giantbomb.com/endless-runner/3015-7179/, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Grønbaek, O. S. Iversen, K. J. Kortbek, K. R. Nielsen, and L. Aagaard. IGameFloor: a platform for co-located collaborative games. In Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology, pages 64--71. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Kenderdine, P. Bourke, M. Thielscher, and M. Nakata. UNSW NIEA DomeLab. http://www.niea.unsw.edu.au/research/projects/domelab, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kiloo. Subway Surfers. http://www.kiloo.com/games/subway-surfers/, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. E. Lantz. The future of virtual reality: head mounted displays versus spatially immersive displays (panel). In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 485--486. ACM, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. Lantz. Large format digital cinema: Medium of the future. Trends in Leisure Entertainment, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. E. Lantz. A Survey of Large-Scale Immersive Displays. New York, NY, Aug. 2007. ACM SIGGRAPH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. L. E. Law. Fulldome Video: An Emerging Technology for Education. Learning & Leading with Technology, 34(3):12--15, Nov. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Li, Y. Huang, V.-S. Tri, J. Elvek, S. Wan, J. Kjallstrom, N. Andersson, M. Johansson, and D. Lejerskar. Interactive theater-sized dome design for edutainment and immersive training. In Proceedings of the 2014 Virtual Reality International Conference, page 8. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. N. Melenbrink and N. King. Fulldome Interfacing. In Emerging Experience in Past, Present and Future of Digital Architecture, pages 221--230, Hong Kong, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. F. Mueller, S. Stellmach, S. Greenberg, A. Dippon, S. Boll, J. Garner, R. Khot, A. Naseem, and D. Altimira. Proxemics play: understanding proxemics for designing digital play experiences. pages 533--542. ACM Press, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. N. Ravaja, T. Saari, M. Turpeinen, J. Laarni, M. Salminen, and M. Kivikangas. Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: Does it matter with whom you play? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(4):381--392, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. Rittenbruch. CubIT: large-scale multi-user presentation and collaboration. pages 441--444. ACM Press, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Rittenbruch, A. Sorensen, J. Donovan, D. Polson, M. Docherty, and J. Jones. The cube: a very large-scale interactive engagement space. pages 1--10. ACM Press, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S. Schnall, C. Hedge, and R. Weaver. The Immersive Virtual Environment of the digital fulldome: Considerations of relevant psychological processes. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(8):561--575, Aug. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. C. Sumners, P. Reiff, and W. Weber. Learning in an immersive digital theater. Advances in Space Research, 42(11):1848--1854, Dec. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. S. Swink. Game feel. A Game Designer's Guide to Virtual Sensation. Burlington, MA, page 1, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Tredinnick and P. Richens. A fulldome interactive visitor experience a novel approach to delivering interactive virtual heritage experiences to group audiences in fulldome projection spaces, evaluated through spatial awareness and emotional response. In 2015 Digital Heritage, volume 1, pages 413--414, Sept. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Unity Technologies ApS. Unity Engine. http://unity3d.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. D. Weibel and B. Wissmath. Immersion in computer games: The role of spatial presence and flow. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2011:6, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. V. L. Wisdom, M. E. Waite, and B. H. Rhea. Amusement ride structure, July 8 1986. US Patent D284,601.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. E. Zimmerman. Play as research: The iterative design process. Design research: Methods and perspectives, 2003:176--184, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. J. Zimmerman, J. Forlizzi, and S. Evenson. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in hci. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 493--502. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interactive dome experiences: designing astrosurf

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AcademicMindtrek '16: Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference
        October 2016
        483 pages
        ISBN:9781450343671
        DOI:10.1145/2994310

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 October 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader