skip to main content
10.1145/2996267.2996268acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesitapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Health Industry Perspective on Augmented Reality as a Communication Tool in Elderly Fall Prevention

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Occupational therapists aim to provide person-centered fall preventative home modifications for older adults. For many older adults, anticipating home modifications and the related effects on their goals and lifestyles presents issues. The health industry seeks to raise compliance rates and successful uptake of recommendations. However, the inability to effectively visually communicate modifications can generate non-compliancy with interventions and safety problems. Augmented reality allows occupational therapists to enhance design communication and empower older clients in a novel manner. This qualitative research explores the industry side of fall prevention and design communication through the experiences of eleven specialist health professionals. Interviews with these experts are conducted and an augmented reality home modification design prototype is presented and evaluated, focusing on service goals and the goals of their older clients. Results show that the health industry welcomes augmented reality; new technologies permit greater person-centeredness by facilitating two-way design communication.

References

  1. American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention. 2001. Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. American Geriatrics Society 49: 664--672.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. L Clemson, A Cusick, and C Fozzard. 1999. Managing risk and exerting control: determining follow through with falls prevention. Disability & Rehabilitation 21, 12: 531--541.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. B Connell. 1996. Role of the environment in falls prevention. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 12,4: 859--880.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A Craig. 2013. Understanding Augmented Reality. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M Currin, T Comans, K Heathcote, and T Haines. 2011. Staying Safe at Home. Home environmental audit recommendations and uptake in an older population at high risk of falling. Australasian Journal on Ageing 31,2: 90--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. H Demirkan. 2007. Housing for the aging population. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity 4, 1: 33--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Y Gschwind, S Eichberg, H Marston, A Eiupi, H de Rosario, M Kroll, M Drobics, J Annegarn, R Wieching, S Lord, K Aal, and K Delbaere. 2014. ICT-based system to predict and prevent falls (iStoppFalls): study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatrics 14, 1: 1--13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. L Gillespie, M Robertson, W Gillespie, C Sherrington, S Gates, L Clemson, and S Lamb. 2012. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L Gitlin, 2003. Commentary: Next Steps in Home Modification and Assistive Technology Research. In Impact of Technology on Successful Aging, N Charness and K Schaie (eds). Springer, New York, NY, 188--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M Lawton. 1985. The Elderly in Context: Perspectives from Environmental Psychology and Gerontology. Environment and Behavior 17,4: 501--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. F Lera, V Rodríguez, C Rodríguez, and V Matellán. 2014. Augmented reality in robotic assistance for the elderly. In Proceedings of International Technology Robotics Applications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M Lo Bianco, S Pedell, G Renda, and A Kapoor. 2015. A Person-Centered Approach for Fall Prevention: Embodying the Goals of Older Adults in Personas. In Proceedings of IASDR 2015, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M Lo Bianco, S Pedell, G Renda, and A Kapoor. 2015. HCI methods for empowering discussion on person-centered fall prevention with older adults. In Proceedings of OzCHI 2015, 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S Lord, C Sherrington, H Menz, and J Close. 2007. Falls in older people: risk factors and strategies for prevention. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. H Marston, A Woodbury, Y Gschwind, M Kroll, D Fink, S Eichberg, K Kreiner, A Ejupi, J Annegarn, H de Rosario, A Wienholtz, R Wieching, and K Delbaere. 2015. The design of a purpose-built exergame for fall prediction and prevention for older people. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity 12,12: 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. National Ageing Research Institute. 2006. What is person-centred health care? A literature review. Victorian Government Department of Human Services.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. Principles for Australia's health system. 2008. Retrieved August 10,2015 from http://www.health.gov.au/intemet/nhhrc/publishing.nsf/content/principles-lpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S Nyman. 2011. Psychosocial issues in Engaging Older People with Physical Activity Interventions for the Prevention of Falls. Canadian Journal on Aging 30,1: 45--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M Patton. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd. ed.). SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. T Plowman, D Prendergast, and S Roberts. 2009. From people to prototypes and products: Ethnographic liquidity and the Intel global aging experience study. Intel® Technology Journal 13, 3: 20--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. E Quintana, and J Favela. 2013. Augmented reality annotations to assist persons with alzheimers and their caregivers. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 6: 1105--1116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Y Rogers, and G Marsden. 2013. Does he take sugar? Moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion. Interactions 20: 48--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J Saldaña. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. R Schulz, and J Heckhausen. 1999. Aging, Culture and Control: Setting a New Research Agenda. Journal of Gerontology 54B, 3:139--145Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. M Stevens, C Holman, and N Bennett. 2001. Preventing Falls in Older People: Impact of an Intervention to Reduce Environmental Hazards in the Home. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 49, 11: 1442--1447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. G Taylor, and H Hawley. 2010. Key Debates in Health Care. Open University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J Vines, G Pritchard, P Wright, P Olivier, and K Brittain. 2015. An Age Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 22,1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J Walker, and J Howland. 1991. Falls and Fear of Falling Among Elderly Persons Living in the Community: Occupational Therapy Interventions. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 45, 2: 119--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. World Health Organisation. 2007. WHO global report on falls prevention in older Age. World Health Organization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. H Yoo, E Chung, and B Lee. 2013. The Effects of Augmented Reality-based Otago Exercise on Balance, Gait, and Falls Efficacy of Elderly Women. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 25, 7: 797--801Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Health Industry Perspective on Augmented Reality as a Communication Tool in Elderly Fall Prevention

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ITAP '16: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Interactive Technology and Ageing Populations
      October 2016
      122 pages
      ISBN:9781450347464
      DOI:10.1145/2996267

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ITAP '16 Paper Acceptance Rate11of22submissions,50%Overall Acceptance Rate11of22submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader