skip to main content
10.1145/2996267.2996275acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesitapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards Ability-Based Optimization for Aging Users

Published:20 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the design of user interfaces for aging adults. Older people differ vastly in how aging affects their perceptual, motor, and cognitive abilities. When it comes to interface design for aging users, the "one design for all" approach fails. We present first results from attempts to extend ability-based design to the aging population. We describe a novel approach using age-related differences as the principle of optimizing interactive tasks. We argue that, to be successful, predictive models must take into account how users adapt their behavioral strategies as a function of their abilities. When combined with design optimization, such models allow us to investigate optimal designs more broadly, examining trade-offs among several design factors. We present first results on optimizing text entry methods for user groups with different age-related declines.

References

  1. Agarwal, R., and Prasad, J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision sciences 30, 2 (1999), 361--391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R., and Milson, R. Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological Review 96, 4 (1989), 703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bailly, G., Oulasvirta, A., Kötzing, T., and Hoppe, S. Menuoptimizer: Interactive optimization of menu systems. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM (2013), 331--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bates, R., and Istance, H. O. Why are eye mice unpopular? a detailed comparison of head and eye controlled assistive technology pointing devices. Universal Access in the Information Society 2, 3 (2003), 280--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bengtson, V. L., Gans, D., Putney, N. M., and Silverstein, M. Theories about age and ageing. In Handbook of Theories of Aging, V. L. Bengtson, D. Gans, N. M. Putney, and M. Silverstein, Eds., 2 ed. Springer, New York, 2009, 3--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabeza, R., Desalaar, S., Dolcos, R, Prince, S., Budde, M., and Nyberg, L. Task-independent and Task-specific Age Effects on Brain Activity during Working Memory, Visual Attention and Episodic Retrieval. Cerebral Cortex 14, 4 (2004), 364--375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Communications of the ACM 23, 1 (1980), 396--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Casali, S. P. A physical skills based strategy for choosing an appropriate interface method. In Extra-ordinary human-computer interaction, Cambridge University Press (1995), 315--341. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Farage, M. A., Miller, K. W., Ajayi, F., and Hutchins, D. Design principles to accommodate older adults. Global journal of health science 4, 2 (2012), 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Findlater, L., Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., and Dawson, J. Ephemeral adaptation: The use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2009), 1655--1664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., and Sharit, J. Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC press, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gajos, K. Z., Weld, D. S., and Wobbrock, J. O. Automatically generating personalized user interfaces with supple. Artificial Intelligence 174, 12 (2010), 910--950. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gajos, K. Z., Wobbrock, J. O., and Weld, D. S. Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users' motor and vision capabilities. In Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM (2007), 231--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gajos, K. Z., Wobbrock, J. O., and Weld, D. S. Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically-generated, ability-based interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2008), 1257--1266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Glisky, E. L. Changes in cognitive function in human aging. Brain aging: models, methods, and mechanisms (2007), 3--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Glisky, E. L., Polster, M. R., and Routhieaux, B. C. Double dissociation between item and source memory. Neuropsychology 9, 2 (1995), 229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Goette, T. Factors leading to the successful use of voice recognition technology. In Proceedings of the third international ACM conference on Assistive technologies, ACM (1998), 189--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Grady, C. L., McIntosh, A. R., Bookstein, F., Horwitz, B., Rapoport, S. I., and Haxby, J. V. Age-related changes in regional cerebral blood flow during working memory for faces. Neuroimage 8, 4 (1998), 409--425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Guiard, Y., and Rioul, O. A mathematical description of the speed/accuracy trade-off of aimed movement. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference, ACM (2015), 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Haegerstrom-Portnoy, G., Schneck, M. E., and Brabyn, J. A. Seeing into old age: vision function beyond acuity. Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry 76, 3 (1999), 141--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hay, J. F., and Jacoby, L. L. Separating habit and recollection in young and older adults: effects of elaborative processing and distinctiveness. Psychology and aging 14, 1 (1999), 122--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurst, A., Hudson, S. E., and Mankoff, J. Dynamic detection of novice vs. skilled use without a task model. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2007), 271--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hurst, A., Hudson, S. E., Mankoff, J., and Trewin, S. Automatically detecting pointing performance. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, ACM (2008), 11--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., and Smith, I. E. Getting off the treadmill: evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, ACM (2008), 109--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P. J., and Robinson, P. User models and user physical capability. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12, 2-3 (2002), 139--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Koester, H. H., LoPresti, E., Ashlock, G., McMillan, W., Moore, P., and Simpson, R. Compass: Software for computer skills assessment. In CSUN 2003 International Conference on Technology and Persons with Disabilities, Los Angeles, CA (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Law, C., Sears, A., and Price, K. Issues in the categorization of disabilities for user testing. In Proceedings of HCII (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Price, K. J., and Sears, A. Performance-based functional assessment: an algorithm for measuring physical capabilities. In Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, ACM (2008), 217--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Hartley, A., Miller, A., Marshuetz, C., and Koeppe, R. A. Age differences in the frontal lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by pet. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 12, 1 (2000), 174--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Salvucci, D. D. An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding. Cognitive Systems Research 1, 4 (2001), 201--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Schneider, B. A., and Pichora-Fuller, M. K. Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Spencer, W. D., and Raz, N. Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: a meta-analysis. Psychology and aging 10, 4 (1995), 527.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sridhar, S., Feit, A. M., Theobalt, C., and Oulasvirta, A. Investigating the dexterity of multi-finger input for mid-air text entry. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2015), 3643--3652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Sturman, M. M., Vaillancourt, D. E., and Corcos, D. M. Effects of aging on the regularity of physiological tremor. Journal of neurophysiology 93, 6 (2005), 3064--3074.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Todi, K., Weir, D., and Oulasvirta, A. Sketchplore: Sketch and explore with a layout optimiser. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS ' 16, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 543--555. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Trewin, S., John, B., Richards, J., Sloan, D., Hanson, V., Bellamy, R., Thomas, J., and Swart, C. Age-specific predictive models of human performance. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2012), 2267--2272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Wobbrock, J. O., Kane, S. K., Gajos, K. Z., Harada, S., and Froehlich, J. Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 3, 3 (2011), 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Towards Ability-Based Optimization for Aging Users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ITAP '16: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Interactive Technology and Ageing Populations
      October 2016
      122 pages
      ISBN:9781450347464
      DOI:10.1145/2996267

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ITAP '16 Paper Acceptance Rate11of22submissions,50%Overall Acceptance Rate11of22submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader