skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998271acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Mobile Collaboration for Human and Canine Police Explosive Detection Teams

Published:25 February 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We designed a communication system for law enforcement officers to use when conducting explosive detection searches with multiple agencies. Dogs trained in explosive detection work alongside human handlers to form a K9 team, which are an integral part of these searches. Officers in K9 teams have a strong bond and communication with these dogs, but noisy locations, long distances, and crowded spaces present challenges. In addition, other officers assigned as backup often lack the experience to read the cues from the canine, which hinders the speed and effectiveness of the team. Coordinating a search with teams from different municipalities presents challenges due to a lack of standard collaboration tools. Getting the right information as quickly as possible saves lives, whether this information is about the areas that have been searched or the location of an explosive device. We hope that in addition to increasing public safety, our system will make working conditions safer for law enforcement officers and their canines.

References

  1. Joelle Alcaidinho, Giancarlo Valentin, Stephanie Tai, Brian Nguyen, Krista Sanders, Melody Jackson, Eric Gilbert, and Thad Starner. 2015. Leveraging Mobile Technology to Increase the Permanent Adoption of Shelter Dogs. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 463--469. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Erika Ashikaga, Mayu Iwata, Daijiro Komaki, Takahiro Hara, and Shojiro Nishio. 2011. Exploring map-based interactions for co-located collaborative work by multiple mobile users. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 417--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt. 1999. Contextual design. In interactions, Vol. 6. ACM, 32--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Alican Bozkurt, David L Roberts, Barbara L Sherman, Rita Brugarolas, Sean Mealin, John Majikes, Pu Yang, and Robert Loftin. 2014. Toward cyber-enhanced working dogs for search and rescue. Intelligent Systems, IEEE 29, 6 (2014), 32--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Walter F Burghardt. 2003. Behavioral considerations in the management of working dogs. In Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, Vol. 33. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kelvin Cheng, Liang He, Xiaojun Meng, David A Shamma, Dung Nguyen, and Anbarasan Thangapalam. 2015. CozyMaps: Real-time Collaboration on a Shared Map with Multiple Displays. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 46--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Andy Crabtree. 2006. Designing collaborative systems: A practical guide to ethnography. Springer Science & Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Paul Dix. 2010. Service-oriented design with Ruby and Rails. Addison-Wesley Professional. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Alexander Ferworn, Alireza Sadeghian, Kevin Barnum, Hossein Rahnama, Huy Pham, Carl Erickson, Devin Ostrom, and Lucia Dell-Agnese. 2006. Urban search and rescue with canine augmentation technology. In System of Systems Engineering, IEEE/SMC International Conference on. IEEE, 5--pp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Forecast.io. 2012. The Dark Sky Forecast API. (2012). https://developer.forecast.io Version 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dominic Furniss and Ann Blandford. 2010. DiCoT modeling: from analysis to design. In Proceedings of CHI workshop bridging the gap: moving from contextual analysis to design. Atlanta, GA. 10--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kenneth G Furton and Lawrence J Myers. 2001. The scientific foundation and efficacy of the use of canines as chemical detectors for explosives. In Talanta, Vol. 54. Elsevier, 487--500.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Steffen Gauglitz, Benjamin Nuernberger, Matthew Turk, and Tobias Höllerer. 2014. World-stabilized annotations and virtual scene navigation for remote collaboration. In Proceedings of the 27th annual symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 449--459. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Irit Gazit, Yizhar Lavner, Gil Bloch, Ophir Azulai, Allen Goldblatt, and Joseph Terkel. 2003. A simple system for the remote detection and analysis of sniffing in explosives detection dogs. In Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, Vol. 35. Springer, 82--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Andrew Gelman, Jeffrey Fagan, and Alex Kiss. 2012. An analysis of the New York City police department's "stop-and-frisk" policy in the context of claims of racial bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Clinton Gormley and Zachary Tong. 2015. Elasticsearch: The Definitive Guide. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.". Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nitesh Goyal and Susan R Fussell. 2016. Effects of Sensemaking Translucence on Distributed Collaborative Analysis. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (2016), 288--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jonathan Grudin. 1994. Computer-supported cooperative work: History and focus. In Computer. IEEE, 19--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Christine A Halverson. 2002. Activity theory and distributed cognition: Or what does CSCW need to DO with theories?. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 11. Springer, 243--267. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. James Hollan, Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh. 2000. Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 7. ACM, 174--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Fung Hu, Danny Silver, and André Trudel. 2007. LonelyDog@ Home. In Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology Workshops, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on. IEEE, 333--337. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. PackTrack Inc. 2016. Our Features. (2016). https://packtrackapp.com/features Version 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Melody M Jackson, Giancarlo Valentin, Larry Freil, Lily Burkeen, Clint Zeagler, Scott Gilliland, Barbara Currier, and Thad Starner. 2015. FIDO-Facilitating interactions for dogs with occupations: wearable communication interfaces for working dogs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 19, 1 (2015), 155--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Steven Johnson, Madeleine Gibson, and Bilge Mutlu. 2015. Handheld or Handsfree?: Remote Collaboration via Lightweight Head-Mounted Displays and Handheld Devices. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1825--1836. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Markus Lanthaler and Christian Gütl. 2012. On using JSON-LD to create evolvable RESTful services. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on RESTful Design. ACM, 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Lisa Lit, Julie B Schweitzer, and Anita M Oberbauer. 2011. Handler beliefs affect scent detection dog outcomes. Animal cognition 14, 3 (2011), 387--394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Andrés Lucero, Jaakko Keränen, and Hannu Korhonen. 2010. Collaborative use of mobile phones for brainstorming. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, 337--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sus Lundgren, Joel E Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Olof Torgersson. 2015. Designing mobile experiences for collocated interaction. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 496--507. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kris Luyten, Kristof Verpoorten, and Karin Coninx. 2007. Ad-hoc co-located collaborative work with mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, 507--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Zhihan Lv, Liangbing Feng, Haibo Li, and Shengzhong Feng. 2014. Hand-free motion interaction on google glass. In SIGGRAPH Asia Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications. ACM, 21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Colin Mackenzie, Peter Fu-Ming Hu, Carsten Fausboll, Michael Nerlich, Thomas Benner, David Gagliano, Warren Whitlock, David Lam, and Yan Xiao. 2007. Challenges to remote emergency decision-making for disasters or Homeland Security. In Cognition, Technology & Work, Vol. 9. Springer, 15--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Clara Mancini. 2011. Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto. Interactions 18, 4 (2011), 69--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Paul Martin, Bo-Jhang Ho, Nicholas Grupen, Samuel Munoz, and Mani Srivastava. 2014. An ibeacon primer for indoor localization: demo abstract. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings. ACM, 190--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Neil Middleton, Richard Schneeman, and others. 2013. Heroku: Up and Running. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.". Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Richard Myers. 2006. Detector Dogs and Probable Cause. George Mason Law Review 14, 1 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Mikko Paldanius, Tuula Kärkkäinen, Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, Oskar Juhlin, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2011. Communication technology for human-dog interaction: exploration of dog owners' experiences and expectations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2641--2650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Inc Ray Allen. 2016. GHOST Series K9 Gear Ray Allen. (2016). https://www.rayallen.com/product/ GHOST-Series-Ultimate-Dog-Harness/ Ghost-Series-K9-Harnesses Version 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Benjamin Resner. 2001. Rover at Home: Computer Mediated Remote Interaction for Dogs. In Media Arts and Sciences MS, Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Yvonne Rogers. 2004. New theoretical approaches for HCI. Annual review of information science and technology 38, 1 (2004), 87--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yvonne Rogers. 2012. HCI theory: classical, modern, and contemporary. In Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, Vol. 5. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 1--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Jesus Savage, RA Sanchez-Guzman, Walterio Mayol-Cuevas, Leobardo Arce, Alejandro Hernandez, Laura Brier, Felipe Martinez, Anaid Velazquez, and Gerardo Lopez. 2000. Animal-machine interfaces. In Wearable Computers, The Fourth International Symposium on. IEEE, 191--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Jörg Schweitzer and Ralf Dörner. 2013. Capturing on site laser annotations with smartphones to document construction work. In Proceedings of the 26th annual symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 357--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Giancarlo Valentin, Joelle Alcaidinho, Ayanna Howard, Melody M Jackson, and Thad Starner. 2016. Creating collar-sensed motion gestures for dog-human communication in service applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 100--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Maria Varsamou and Theodore Antonakopoulos. 2014. A bluetooth smart analyzer in iBeacon networks. In Consumer Electronics of Berlin (ICCE-Berlin), IEEE Fourth International Conference on. IEEE, 288--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Chadwick A Wingrave, Jeremy Rose, Todd Langston, and Joseph J LaViola Jr. 2010. Early explorations of CAT: Canine amusement and training. In CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2661--2670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mobile Collaboration for Human and Canine Police Explosive Detection Teams

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      February 2017
      2556 pages
      ISBN:9781450343350
      DOI:10.1145/2998181

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate183of530submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader