skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998324acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Send Me a Different Message: Utilizing Cognitive Space to Create Engaging Message Triggers

Published:25 February 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social systems and applications often rely on message triggers to promote, remind and even persuade people to perform certain actions. However, repeated exposure to these triggers can lead to boredom, annoyance and decreased engagement. While existing research suggests that diversification of trigger contents may mitigate these issues, no systematic way of introducing it has been proposed. This paper proposes two message diversification strategies based on the use of cognitive spaces: 1) target-diverse -- using concepts cognitively close to the targeted action; and 2) self-diverse -- using concepts cognitively close to the message's recipient. Through a controlled experiment we found that the self-diverse strategy reduces annoyance and boredom from repeated exposure and that both strategies increase perceived informativeness and helpfulness of the triggers. In a subsequent 2-week long field deployment focused on assessing the effects of the self-diverse strategy, we found that this strategy results in higher activity completion through supporting awareness, providing more information, and making the triggers more personally relevant. These diverse triggers are perceived as motivators rather than simple reminders. We conclude with insights on how to design and generate diverse messages.

References

  1. Wokje Abrahamse, Linda Steg, Charles Vlek, and Talib Rothengatter. 2005. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25, 273--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2: 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Azy {Ed} Barak. 2008. Online Motivational Factors: Incentives for Participation and Contribution in Wikipedia. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Roy F. Baumeister, Ellen Bratslavsky, Catrin Finkenauer, and Kathleen D. Vohs. 2001. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5, 4: 323--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. E. Berlyne. 1970. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics 8, 5: 279--286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Elena Bessarabova, Edward L. Fink, and Monique Turner. 2013. Reactance, Restoration, and Cognitive Structure: Comparative Statics. Human Communication Research 39, 3: 339--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Samuel R. Bowman, Luke Vilnis, Oriol Vinyals, Andrew M. Dai, Rafal Jozefowicz, and Samy Bengio. 2015. Generating Sentences from a Continuous Space. http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06349Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rosalind A. Breslow, Ralph J. Coates, Jon Kerner, et al. 2008. Client-Directed Interventions to Increase Community Demand for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35, 1: S34--S55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. P. Burnard, P. Gill, K. Stewart, E. Treasure, and B. Chadwick. 2008. Analysing and presenting qualitative data. BDJ 204, 8: 429--432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. John T Cacioppo and Richard E Petty. 1979. Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 1: 97--109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jilin Chen, Gary Hsieh, Jalal U. Mahmud, and Jeffrey Nichols. 2014. Understanding individuals' personal values from social media word use. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing CSCW '14, 405--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yan Chen, F. Maxwell Harper, Joseph Konstan, and Sherry Xin Li. Social Comparisons and Contributions to Online Communities: A Field Experiment on MovieLens.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Heather L. Coley, Rajani S. Sadasivam, Jessica H. Williams, et al. 2013. Crowdsourced Peer- Versus Expert-Written Smoking-Cessation Messages. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 45, 5: 543--550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sunny Consolvo, Predrag Klasnja, David W. McDonald, and James A. Landay. 2014. Designing for Healthy Lifestyles: Design Considerations for Mobile Technologies to Encourage Consumer Health and Wellness.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. James Price Dillard and Lijiang Shen. 2005. On the Nature of Reactance and its Role in Persuasive Health Communication. Communication Monographs 72, 2: 144--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Leslie D. Dinauer and Edward L. Fink. 2005. Interattitude Structure and Attitude Dynamics. Human Communication Research 31, 1: 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. W Ebben and L Brudzynski. 2008. Motivations and barriers to exercise among college students. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online. http://www.asep.org/asep/asep/EbbenJEPonlineOctober200_8.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ofer Egozi, Shaul Markovitch, and Evgeniy Gabrilovich. 2011. Concept-Based Information Retrieval Using Explicit Semantic Analysis. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 29, 2: 1--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Douglas Ezzy. 2013. Qualitative analysis. Routledge (2013)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Edward Luis Fink and Joseph Woelfel. 1980. The measurement of communication processes: Galileo theory and method. Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Brianna S. Fjeldsoe, Alison L. Marshall, and Yvette D. Miller. 2009. Behavior Change Interventions Delivered by Mobile Telephone Short-Message Service. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 36, 2: 165--173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Bj Fogg. 2009. A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Persuasive '09: 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Shalini Ghosh, Oriol Vinyals, Brian Strope, Scott Roy, Tom Dean, and Larry Heck. 2016. Contextual LSTM: A Step towards Hierarchical Language Modeling.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. K Glanz, BK Rimer, and K Viswanath. 2008. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jennifer Golbeck, Cristina Robles, and Karen Turner. 2011. Predicting personality with social media. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems CHI EA '11, 253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Joseph Grandpre, Eusebio M. Alvaro, Michael Burgoon, Claude H. Miller, and John R. Hall. 2003. Adolescent Reactance and Anti-Smoking Campaigns: A Theoretical Approach. Health Communication 15, 3: 349--366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Albert A. Harrison and Rick Crandall. 1972. Heterogeneity-homogeneity of exposure sequence and the attitudinal effect of exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21, 2: 234--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Matthias R. Hastall and Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick. 2013. Severity, Efficacy, and Evidence Type as Determinants of Health Message Exposure. Health Communication 28, 4: 378--388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Katharine J. Head, Seth M. Noar, Nicholas T. Iannarino, and Nancy Grant Harrington. 2013. Efficacy of text messaging-based interventions for health promotion: A meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine 97: 41--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Lois Jane Heller, Celette Sugg Skinner, A. Janet Tomiyama, et al. 2013. Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change. In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer NY, NY, NY, 1997--2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Guillaume Hervet, Katherine Guérard, Sébastien Tremblay, and Mohamed Saber Chtourou. 2011. Is banner blindness genuine? Eye tracking internet text advertising. Applied Cognitive Psychology 25, 5: 708--716.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. 2015. Deep learning. Nature 521, 7553: 436--444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Joowon Lee, Jae-Hyeon Ahn, and Byungho Park. 2015. The effect of repetition in Internet banner ads and the moderating role of animation. Computers in Human Behavior 46: 202--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Omer Levy, Yoav Goldberg, and Ido Dagan. 2015. Improving Distributional Similarity with Lessons Learned from Word Embeddings. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 3, 0: 211--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Yon Soo Lim. 2008. Persuasive Message Strategy for International Development Campaigns: A Theoretical Aapplication of The Galileo Spatial-Linkage Model.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Yon Soo Lim. 2015. Exploring persuasive message strategy for international aid campaigns: potential donors' inter-attitudinal structure using Galileo model. Quality & Quantity 49, 4: 1397--1415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Bess H Marcus and LeighAnn H Forsyth. 2013. Motivating people to be physically active. Human Kinetics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Scott McCoy, Andrea Everard, Dennis F. Galletta, and Gregory D. Moody. 2016. Here we go again! The impact of website ad repetition on recall, intrusiveness, attitudes, and site revisit intentions. Information & Management. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. David Milne and Ian H Witten. 2008. An Effective, Low-Cost Measure of Semantic Relatedness Obtained from Wikipedia Links.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Sarah Milne, Sheina Orbell, and Paschal Sheeran. 2002. Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology 7, 2: 163--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Felix Naughton, A Toby Prevost, Hazel Gilbert, and Stephen Sutton. 2012. Randomized controlled trial evaluation of a tailored leaflet and SMS text message self-help intervention for pregnant smokers (MiQuit). Nicotine & tobacco research: official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 14, 5: 569--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Pippa Norris. 2003. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Anish Parikh, Carl Behnke, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Barbara Almanza, and Doug Nelson. 2014. Motives for reading and articulating user-generated restaurant reviews on Yelp.com. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology 5, 2: 160--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Michael Quinn Patton. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Cornelia Pechmann and David W. Stewart. 2012. Advertising Repetition: A Critical Review of Wearin and Wearout. Current Issues and Research in Advertising.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Reinhold Penner and Richard Caelers. 2012. Workrave. http://www.workrave.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Mirko Tobias Schäfer. 2011. Bastard Culture! How User Participation Transforms Cultural Production. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. David W. Schumann, Richard E. Petty, and D. Scott Clemons. 1990. Predicting the Effectiveness of Different Strategies of Advertising Variation: A Test of the Repetition-Variation Hypotheses. Journal of Consumer Research 17, 2: 192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Shalom H. Schwartz, Jan Cieciuch, Michele Vecchione, et al. 2012. Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103, 4: 663--688.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Shalom H. Schwartz. 2012. An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2, 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Andreas R. Schwerdtfeger, Catalina Schmitz, and Matthias Warken. 2012. Using Text Messages to Bridge the Intention-Behavior Gap? A Pilot Study on the Use of Text Message Reminders to Increase Objectively Assessed Physical Activity in Daily Life. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Shilad Sen, Toby Jia-Jun Li, WikiBrain Team, and Brent Hecht. 2014. WikiBrain: Democratizing Computation on Wikipedia. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration OpenSym '14, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Alessandro Sordoni, Michel Galley, Michael Auli, et al. 2015. A Neural Network Approach to Context-Sensitive Generation of Conversational Responses. Retrieved August 9, 2016 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.06714Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Victor J. Strecher, Saul Shiffman, and Robert West. 2005. Randomized controlled trial of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. Addiction 100, 5: 682--688.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Esther Toet, Bernt Meerbeek, and Jettie Hoonhout. 2009. Supporting mindful eating?: inbalance chopping board. Eat, Cook, Grow: Mixing 34, 51: 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Roger Tourangeau, Kenneth A Rasinski, and Roy D'Andrade. 1991. Attitude structure and belief accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27, 1: 48--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Roelof A.J. de Vries, Khiet P. Truong, Sigrid Kwint, Constance H.C. Drossaert, and Vanessa Evers. 2016. Crowd-Designed Motivation: Motivational messages for exercise adherence based on behavior change theory. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '16, 297--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Bo Xu and Dahui Li. 2015. An empirical study of the motivations for content contribution and community participation in Wikipedia. Information & Management 52, 3: 275--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. 2015. Aqualert. http://aqualertapp.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Send Me a Different Message: Utilizing Cognitive Space to Create Engaging Message Triggers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      February 2017
      2556 pages
      ISBN:9781450343350
      DOI:10.1145/2998181

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate183of530submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader