skip to main content
10.1145/2998581.2998607acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesafrichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Undereducation, Motivating Intervention in Rural Schools with MAPPS

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many primary school students in rural areas of developing countries perform poorly in national final exams, and therefore, fail to transit to secondary schools. This problem causes undereducation and shortage of skilled manpower in the developing countries. Mobile Academic Performance Prediction System (MAPPS) is a technology that categorises students into two groups: those requiring high intervention and those requiring low intervention. This study investigates predicting the students that need high intervention in order to motivate initiation of intervention measures early enough. The focus in this paper is the mobile application design process and the usability evaluation of MAPPS.

References

  1. M. Delgado Calvo-Flores, E. Gibaja Galindo, M. C. Pegalajar Jiménez, and O. Pérez Pineiro, 2006. Predicting students' marks from Moodle logs using neural network models. Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education, 1, 586--590.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Necdet Güner, Abdulkadir Yaldιr, Gürhan Gündüz, Emre Çomak, Sezai Tokat, and Serdar İplikçi, 2014. Predicting academically at-risk engineering students: A soft computing application. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11(5), pp.199--216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Marco Kalz, N. Lenssen, M. Felzen, R. Rossaint, B. Tabuenca, M. Specht, and M. Skorning, 2014. Smartphone apps for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and real incident support: a mixed-methods evaluation study. Journal of medical Internet research, 16(3), p.e89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. B. Kotsiantis, and Panagiotis Pintelas, 2005, July. Predicting students marks in hellenic open university. In Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05) (pp. 664--668). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gary Marsden, Andrew Maunder, and Munier Parker, 2008. People are people, but technology is not technology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,366(1881), pp.3795--3804.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Mvurya Mgala, and Mbogho, 2014, November. Selecting relevant features for classifier optimization. In International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications (pp. 211--222). Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mvurya Mgala, and Audrey Mbogho, 2015, May. Data-driven intervention-level prediction modeling for academic performance. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (p. 2). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mvurya Mgala, Audrey Mbogho, Z. Mwatelah, and S. Hussein, 2015. Investigating mobile academic performance prediction system's predictive ability. CAPA Scientific Journal 3 15--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Okazaki, F. Mendez, 2013. Perceived ubiquity in mobile services. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(2), pp.98--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. Tamhane, S. Ikbal, B. Sengupta, M. Duggirala, and J. Appleton, 2014, August. Predicting student risks through longitudinal analysis. InProceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1544--1552). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jiliang Tang, Salem Alelyani, and Huan Liu, 2014. Feature selection for classification: A review. Data Classification: Algorithms and Applications, 37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sanne van der Weegen, Renée Verwey, Huibert J. Tange, Marieke D. Spreeuwenberg, and Luc de Witte, 2014. Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity. Patient preference and adherence, (8) 311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Undereducation, Motivating Intervention in Rural Schools with MAPPS
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AfriCHI '16: Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction
        November 2016
        279 pages
        ISBN:9781450348300
        DOI:10.1145/2998581

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 November 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader