skip to main content
10.1145/3004323.3004349acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Role Negotiation in a Haptic Shared Control Framework

Published:24 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Haptic shared control is a promising means for combining the best of human manual control with automatic control, keeping the human in the loop while avoiding automation pitfalls. In this study, we consider a situation in which both human and the automation system recognize an obstacle but choose different paths of avoidance. While the driver and automation have similar perceptions of the situation, the commands they issue are incompatible and their simple sum is most likely dangerous. To resolve this issue, this study is focused on exploring how roles (i.e. leader and follower) in a haptic collaboration can be negotiated and exchanged between the two partners. Specifically, we test the influence of the timing of cues to promote adoption of leader and follower roles in a shared control task. Preliminary results suggest that haptic feedback can enhance drivability and prevent accidents.

References

  1. N. B. Sarter, D. D. Woods, and C. E. Billings, "Automation surprises," Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, vol. 2, no. 1926-1943, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Steele, R. B. Gillespie, and a. Arbor, "Shared Control Between Human and Machine: Using a Haptic Steering Wheel to Aid in Land Vehicle Guidance," Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 45th Annual Meeting, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. G. Griffiths and R. B. Gillespie, "Sharing Control Between Humans and Automation Using Haptic Interface: Primary and Secondary Task Performance Benefits," Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 47, pp. 574--590, oct 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. K. O'Malley, A. Gupta, M. Gen, and Y. Li, "Shared Control in Haptic Systems for Performance Enhancement and Training," Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 128, no. 1, p. 75, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. A. Abbink, M. Mulder, and E. R. Boer, "Haptic Shared Control: Smoothly Shifting Control Authority?," Cognition, Technology and Work, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 19--28, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. Boehm, A. Ghasemi, S. O'Modhrain, P. Jayakumar, and R. Gillespie, "Architectures for Shared Control of Vehicle Steering," in IFAC - Human and Machine Symposium, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. F. S. Erlien, S.M. and J. Gerdes, "Safe Driving Envelopes for Shared Control of Ground Vehicles," in Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Automotive Control, pp. 831--836, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Anderson, S. Walker and K. Iagnemma, "Experimental Performance Analysis of a Constraint-Based Navigation Framework," Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics--Part A: Systems and Humans, pp. 1--10, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. F. S. Erlien, S.M. and J. Gerdes, "Shared Steering Control Using Safe Envelopes for Obstacle Avoidance and Vehicle Stability," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,, pp. 1--11, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. Dahlbäck, A. Jönsson, and L. Ahrenberg, "Wizard of Oz Studies - Why and How," in 1st international conference on intelligent user interfaces, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader