skip to main content
10.1145/3017611.3017614acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Emergency online attention and psychological distance under risk

Published:31 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Risk communication is an effective means of emergency management. Online information plays an important role in risk communication, especially in the Big Data Era. Citizens' psychology to send and receive information determines their online behavior when they face risk. Using the Tianjin Port Explosions as an example, multiple linear regression analysis is used to untangle the relationship between online attention and psychology behavior under risk. Citizens' online attention is estimated by social media data collection from the Sina Weibo. Psychology behavior is quantified by psychological distance which consists of four dimensions: spatial distance, temporal distance, social distance and probability. The regression model is built via SPSS 20.0 and the obtained result is matched with actual situation. It indicates that online attention is negatively correlated to spatial distance, temporal distance and social distance while positively correlated to probability of the event. It also shows that citizens' online attention under risk is positively correlated to their online attention under normal circumstance. Based on the regression model, citizens' attention and response to emergency are easy to be assessed.

References

  1. Maharaj, S., Kleczkowski, A. 2012. Controlling epidemic spread by social distancing: Do it well or not at all. BMC Public Health, 2012, 12(1): 679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Trope, Y. and Liberman, N. 2010. Construal-level theory of psychological distance, Psychol Rev 117:440--463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., McCrea, S. M., et al. 2007. The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2007, 43(1): 143--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ruths, D., Pfeffer, J. 2014. Social media for large studies of behavior. Science, 2014, 346(6213): 1063--1064.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Liberman, N. and Trope, Y. 2014. Traversing psychological distance. Trends Cogn Sci 18:364--369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Huang, P., Zhang, J. 2015. Facts related to August 12, 2015 explosion accident in Tianjin, China. Process Safety Progress, 2015, 34(4): 313--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chung, Y. S., Kim, H. S. 2015. On the August 12, 2015 occurrence of explosions and fires in Tianjin, China, and the atmospheric impact observed in central Korea. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2015, 8(6): 521--532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bilali, R., Vollhardt, J. R., Rarick, J. R. D. 2015. Assessing the Impact of a Media - based Intervention to Prevent Intergroup Violence and Promote Positive Intergroup Relations in Burundi. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Deng, Q., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., et al. 2016. A new crowdsourcing model to assess disaster using microblog data in typhoon Haiyan. Natural Hazards, 2016: 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Emergency online attention and psychological distance under risk

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          EM-GIS '16: Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGSPATIALInternational Workshop on the Use of GIS in Emergency Management
          October 2016
          101 pages
          ISBN:9781450345804
          DOI:10.1145/3017611

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 31 October 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          EM-GIS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate16of26submissions,62%Overall Acceptance Rate30of54submissions,56%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader