skip to main content
10.1145/3020165.3022126acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Query Reformulation Patterns of Mixed Language Queries in Different Search Intents

Published:07 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the increasing number of multilingual resources on the Internet, cross-language information retrieval has become an important research topic. In cultures where people speak both Chinese and English, using mixed language in oral speaking and web searching is a common phenomenon. While queries are the key element of information retrieval process, mixed-language queries have not yet been adequately studied. This study use query log analysis to examine the query reformulation patterns regarding Chinese-English mixed language queries, and how search intents may affect the query reformulation types users employ. The results can inform IR system designers to enhance cross-language controlled vocabularies and develop discovery platforms for multilingual content, and improve search engines to provide users with more relevant, personalized search results. The findings could also be expanded to other language combinations that would improve search engine designs.

References

  1. Auer, P. 1998. Code-Switching in conversation: Language, interaction, and identify. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chau, M., Fang, X., and Yang, C. C. 2007. Web searching in Chinese: A study of a search engine in Hong Kong. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol., 58, 7, 1044--1054. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Rieh, S.Y. and Xie, H. 2006. Analysis of multiple query reformulations on the web: the interactive information retrieval context. Inf Process Manag., 42, 3, 751--768. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lau, T. and Horvitz, E. 1999. Patterns of search: analyzing and modeling Web query refinement. In User Modeling '99, 119--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. He, D., Göker, A., and Harper, D.J. 2002. Combining evidence for automatic web session identification. Inf Process Manag., 38, 5, 727--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., Blakely, C., and Koshman, S. 2007. Defining a session on Web search engines: Research Articles. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol., 58, 6, 862--871. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bruza, P., and Dennis, S. 1997. Query Reformulation on the Internet: Empirical Data and the Hyperindex Search Engine. In RIAO, 97, 488--499. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Guo, J., Xu, G., Li, H., and Cheng, X. 2008. A unified and discriminative model for query refinement. In SIGIR '08, 379--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Huang, J., and Efthimiadis, E. N. 2009. Analyzing and evaluating query reformulation strategies in web search logs. In CIKM'09, 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Liu, C., Gwizdka, J., Liu, J., Xu, T., and Belkin, N. J. 2010. Analysis and evaluation of query reformulations in different task types. In ASIST'10, 47, 1, 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Broder, A. 2002. A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum, 36, 2, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jansen, B. J., Booth, D. L., and Spink, A. 2008. Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of web queries. Information Processing and Management, 44, 3, 1251--1266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rose, D., and Levinson, D. 2004. Understanding user goals in web search. In S. Feldman, M. Uretsky, M. Najork, & C. Wills (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, 13--19. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lewandowski, D. 2006. Query types and search topics of German web search engine users. Information Services and Use, 26, 4, 261--269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lewandowski, D., Drechsler, J., and Mach, S. 2012. Deriving query intents from web search engine queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 9, 1773--1788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Chau, M., Fang, X., and Yang, C. C. 2007. Web searching in Chinese: A study of a search engine in Hong Kong. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol., 58, 7, 1044--1054. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Chau, M., Lu, Y., Fang, X., and Yang, C. C. 2009. Characteristics of character usage in Chinese web searching. Inf Process Manag., 45, 1, 115--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lu, Y., Chau, M., Fang, X., and Yang, C. C. 2006. Analysis of the bilingual queries in a Chinese web search engine. Retrieved June 1, 2014 from http://www.business.hku.hk/~mchau/papers/BilingualQueries_WEB.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fu, H., and Wu, S. 2015. Studying Chinese-English mixed language queries from the user perspectives. In JCDL'15, 247--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Fu, H., and Wu, S. 2014. Analyzing Chinese-English mixed language queries in a web search engine. In ASIST'14, 51, 1, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Query Reformulation Patterns of Mixed Language Queries in Different Search Intents

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHIIR '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
            March 2017
            454 pages
            ISBN:9781450346771
            DOI:10.1145/3020165
            • Conference Chairs:
            • Ragnar Nordlie,
            • Nils Pharo,
            • Program Chairs:
            • Luanne Freund,
            • Birger Larsen,
            • Dan Russel

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 March 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper

            Acceptance Rates

            CHIIR '17 Paper Acceptance Rate10of48submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate55of163submissions,34%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader