skip to main content
10.1145/3020165.3022174acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Missing Information in the Classroom and Misinformed by the Crowd: Developing Analytical Skills for Understanding Online Controversies

Published:07 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

At the heart of this research is the role freedom of speech and freedom of access plays in the information era. Prior research found that while our access to information is rising, so is our level of spreading misinformation. This research will build on these prior studies to argue that our biases lead us to share less meaningful knowledge constructs. To tackle this problem this study integrates the fields of Human-Computer Interactions (to study our implicit biases), Social Network Analysis (to research the spread of biases), Information Visualization (to study the representation of bias) and Collaborative Information Behaviour (to observe the dialogical reconciliation of biases). The research will build on prior research to explore how students contextualize the various biases in the science controversies that they encounter online. Two objectives have been set to be accomplished by the end of this research: 1) develop a strategy for classrooms to equip students with skills for evaluating online science information and 2) develop recommendations for how online interfaces can present information that contextualizes conflicting information in a science controversy.

References

  1. "National Science Board (2014) Science and Engineering Indicators." National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ofcom, "Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report," Nov. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. M. Meyers, "Access denied: how students resolve information needs when an ideal document is restricted," in Proceedings of the 2012 iConference, 2012, pp. 629--631. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. N. J. Belkin, M. Cole, and J. Liu, "A model for evaluation of interactive information retrieval," presented at the Proceedings of the SIGIR 2009 Workshop on the Future of IR Evaluation, 2009, pp. 7--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Epstein and R. E. Robertson, "The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., p. 201419828, Aug. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Hargittai, "Digital Na(t)ives" Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the "Net Generation,"? Sociol. Inq., vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 92--113, Feb. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. "BC Grade 8 Curriculum for Information Technology," 2015. {Online}. Available: https://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/irp/curric_grade_packages/gr8curric_req.pdf. {Accessed: 23-Nov-2015}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Kelly, "Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users," Found. Trends Inf. Retr., vol. 3, no. 1--2, pp. 1--224, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Case, "Sixty years of measuring the use of information and its sources: from consultation to application," Libr. Digit. Age LIDA Proc., vol. 13, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Borlund, "Interactive Information Retrieval: An Introduction," J. Inf. Sci. Theory Pract., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 12--32, Sep. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. D. M. Kahan, A. R. Landrum, K. Carpenter, L. Helft, and K. H. Jamieson, "Science Curiosity and Political Information Processing," Adv. Polit. Psychol. Forthcom., 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Creswell, Research Design - Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach, vol. 3. Sage, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. Hewson and D. Laurent, "Research Design and Tools for Internet Research," in The Sage Handbook of online Research Methods, Fielding, Lee, and Blank, Eds. Sage, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. M. Lee, N. Fielding, and G. Blank, The Internet as a Research Medium: An Editorial Introduction to The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. Sage, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Novin and E. Meyers, "Making Sense of Online Science: Exploring 'Bias' in the Search Engine Result Page," in Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Missing Information in the Classroom and Misinformed by the Crowd: Developing Analytical Skills for Understanding Online Controversies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHIIR '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
      March 2017
      454 pages
      ISBN:9781450346771
      DOI:10.1145/3020165
      • Conference Chairs:
      • Ragnar Nordlie,
      • Nils Pharo,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Luanne Freund,
      • Birger Larsen,
      • Dan Russel

      Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 March 2017

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHIIR '17 Paper Acceptance Rate10of48submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate55of163submissions,34%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader