skip to main content
10.1145/3027063.3053094acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Combating Sedentary Behavior: An App Based on a Distributed Prospective Memory Approach

Published:06 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sedentary behavior such as sitting is associated with severe health issues. We suggest that the sedentary behavior problem can be considered as a prospective memory task: remember to get enough activity within 30-minute periods. We describe the functions, development, and pilot evaluation of a theoretically motivated smartphone app to combat the sedentary behavior based on human movement research and distributed prospective memory. Finally, we outline the methods of a larger evaluation of the app and discuss limitations and future extensions of the distributed prospective memory approach.

References

  1. Barbara E. Ainsworth, William L. Haskell, Stephan D. Herrmann, Nathanael Meckes, Jr David R. Bassett, Catrine Tudor-Locke, Jennifer L. Greer, Jesse W. Vezina, Melicia C. Whitt-Glover, and Arthur S. Leon. The Compendium of Physical Activities Tracking Guide. Healthy Lifestyles Research Center, College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University. Retrieved August 22, 2014 from https://sites.google.com/ site/compendiumofphysicalactivities/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Douglas L. Ballor, Motier D. Becque, and Victor L. Katch. 1987. Metabolic responses during hydraulic resistance exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 19, 4: 363--367. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Judit Bort-Roig, Nicholas D. Gilson, Anna PuigRibera, Ruth S. Contreras, and Stewart G. Trost. 2014. Measuring and influencing physical activity with smartphone technology: A systematic review. Sports Med. 44, 5: 671--686.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sunny Consolvo, David W. Mcdonald, Tammy Toscos, Mike Y. Chen, Jon Froehlich, Beverly Harrison, Predrag Klasnja, Anthony Lamarca, Louis Legrand, Ryan Libby, Ian Smith, and James A. Landay, 2008. Activity sensing in the wild: A field trial of ubifit garden. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), 17971806.http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357335 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Saskia Dantzig, Gijs Geleijnse, and Aart Tijmen Halteren. 2013. Toward a persuasive mobile application to reduce sedentary behavior. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 17, 6: 1237--1246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0588-0 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Leandro F. M. de Rezende, Maurício R. Lopes, Juan P. Rey-López, Victor K. R. Matsudo, and Olinda do Carmo Luiz. 2014. Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: An overview of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE 9, 8: e105620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Key Dismukes. 2012. Prospective memory in workplace and everyday situations. Curr. Dir. Psychol. 21, 4: 215--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. David W. Dunstan, Bronwyn A. Kingwell, Robyn Larsen, Genevieve N. Healy, Ester Cerin, Marc T. Hamilton, Jonathan E. Shaw, David A. Bertovic, Paul Z. Zimmet, and Jo Salmon. 2012. Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Diabetes care 35, 976--983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ulf Ekelund, Jostein Steene-Johannessen, Wendy J Brown, Morten Wang Fagerland, Neville Owen, Kenneth E Powell, Adrian Bauman, I-Min Lee, Lancet Physical Activity Series, and Lancet Sedentary Behaviour Working Group. 2016. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. The Lancet 388, 10051: 1302--1310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Brian J. Fogg. 2009. A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology ACM, 40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Thomas Fritz, Elaine M. Huang, Gail C. Murphy, and Thomas Zimmermann. 2014. Persuasive technology in the real world: a study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 487--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rúben Gouveia, Evangelos Karapanos, and Marc Hassenzahl, 2015. How do we engage with activity trackers? A longitudinal study of Habito. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 1305--1316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tobias Grundgeiger, Penelope Sanderson, and R. Key Dismukes. 2014. Prospective memory in complex sociotechnical systems. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 222, 2: 100--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Marc T. Hamilton, Deborah G. Hamilton, and Theodore W. Zderic. 2007. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes 56, 11: 2655--2667. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Qian He and Emmanuel Agu, 2014. On11: An activity recommendation application to mitigate sedentary lifestyle. In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Physical Analytics2014, 3--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Erik Hollnagel and David D. Woods. 2005. Joint cognitive systems: Foundations of cognitive systems engineering Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwin Hutchins. 1995. How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cogn. Sci. 19, 3: 265--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Predrag Klasnja, Sunny Consolvo, and Wanda Pratt. 2011. How to evaluate technologies for health behavior change in HCI research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 30633072. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Phillippa Lally, Cornelia H. M. Van Jaarsveld, Henry W. W. Potts, and Jane Wardle. 2010. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40, 6: 998--1009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. James A. Levine, Sara J. Schleusner, and Michael D. Jensen. 2000. Energy expenditure of nonexercise activity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72, 6: 1451--1454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ulman Lindenberger, Martin Lovden, Michael Schellenbach, Sue-Chen Li, and Antonio Krüger. 2008. Psychological principles of successful aging technologies: A mini-review. Gerontology 54, 1: 59--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mark A. McDaniel and Gilles O. Einstein. 2000. Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. App. Cogn. Psych.14, 127--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Laura R. Pina, Ernesto R. Ramirez, and William G. Griswold. 2012. Fitbit+: A behavior-based intervention system to reduce sedentary behavior. In 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops, 175--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. James O. Prochaska and Wayne F. Velicer. 1997. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am. J. Health Promot. 12, 1: 38--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ian Renfree, Daniel Harrison, Paul Marshall, Katarzyna Stawarz, and Anna Cox, 2016. Don't kick the habit: The role of dependency in habit formation apps. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 2932--2939. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Katarzyna Stawarz and Anna L. Cox. 2015. Designing for health behavior change: HCI research alone is not enough. In CHI'15 workshop: Crossing HCI and Health: Advancing Health and Wellness Technology Research in Home and Community Settings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Katarzyna Stawarz, Anna L. Cox, and Ann Blandford. 2015. Beyond self-tracking and reminders: Designing smartphone apps that support habit formation. In Proceedings of the SIGHCI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2653--2662. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Combating Sedentary Behavior: An App Based on a Distributed Prospective Memory Approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450346566
      DOI:10.1145/3027063

      Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 May 2017

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '17 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader