Dimitra Anastasiou
ABSTRACT
This paper presents an intelligent tangible user interface used for learning in a collaborative setting in a secondary school environment. We describe our explorative case study with 48 participants and report the results of a questionnaire filled in after the end of the case study. The questionnaire is related to feedback modalities, such as visual, audio/aural, and haptic, which the participants would like to have offered in the future by the tangible interface or the tangible objects.
- Dimitra Anastasiou, Eric Ras. 2016. Survey Analysis on Collaborative Problem Solving using a Tangible Interface. Proc. of the Technology-enhanced Assessment, Tallinn, Estonia.Google Scholar
- Eva L. Baker, Richard E. Mayer. 1999. Computer-based assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(3), 269--282. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dirk Börner et al. 2015. Tangible interactive ambient display prototypes to support learning scenarios. Proc. of TEI, 721--726. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, Rodney R. Cocking, R. (Eds.). 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Ben P. Challis, Alistair D. Edwards. 200 Design principles for tactile interaction. Haptic Human-Computer Interaction, 17--24.Google Scholar
- Tom Djajadiningrat, Kees Overbeeke, Stephan Wensveen. 2002. But how, Donald, tell us how?: on the creation of meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback. Proc.DIS, 285--291. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patrick Griffin, Esther Care, Barry McGaw. 2012. The changing role of education and schools. P.Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.). Assessment and Teaching 21st Century Skills, 1--15.Google Scholar
- Tobias Grosse-Puppendahl., Sebastian Beck, Daniel Wilbers. 2014. Rainbowfish: visual feedback on gesture-recognizing surfaces. Proc. of CHI, 427--430. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Hattie, Helen Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1). Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard Higgins, Peter Hartley, Alan Skelton. 2001. Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 269--274. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Uran Oh, Shaun Kane, Leah Findlater. 2013. Follow that sound: using sonification and corrective verbal feedback to teach touchscreen gestures. Proc. of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '13). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Orsmond, Stephen Merry, Kevin Reiling. 2000. The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 21--38. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eric Ras et al. 2014. Moving towards the assessment of collaborative problem solving skills with a tangible user interface. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 13(4).Google Scholar
- Yigal Rosen. 2015. Computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving: Exploring the feasibility of human-to-agent approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25(3), 380--406. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Valerie J. Shute. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153--189. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eric Tobias, Valérie Maquil, Thibaud Latour. 2015. TULIP: A widget-based software framework for tangible tabletop interfaces. Proc. of the 7th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, 216--221. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brygg Ullmer, Hiroshi Ishii. 2000. Emerging Frameworks for Tangible User Interfaces. IBM Syst. J. 39(3--4), 915--931.Google Scholar
- Jan B.F. van Erp et al. 2010. Setting the standards for haptic and tactile interactions: ISO's work. Proc. of the 2010 international conference on Haptics - generating and perceiving tangible sensations, 353--358.Google Scholar
- Jo Vermeulen et al. 2013. Crossing the bridge over Norman's Gulf of Execution: revealing feedforward's true identity. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1931--1940. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A Questionnaire-based Case Study on Feedback by a Tangible Interface
Recommendations
A tangible user interface for interactive data visualization
CASCON '15: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software EngineeringWe present a prototype for a Tangible User Interface (TUI) designed to interactively query a database. While much work has been done on TUI, showing that they encourage collaboration and positively enhance user experience, few tangible systems have been ...
Comparing Tangible and Multi-touch Interaction for Interactive Data Visualization Tasks
TEI '16: Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied InteractionInteractive visualization plays a key role in the analysis of large datasets. It can help users to explore data, investigate hypotheses and find patterns. The easier and more tangible the interaction, the more likely it is to enhance understanding. This ...
Pen-top feedback for paper-based interfaces
UIST '06: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technologyCurrent paper-based interfaces such as PapierCraft, provide very little feedback and this limits the scope of possible interactions. So far, there has been little systematic exploration of the structure, constraints, and contingencies of feedback-...
Comments