skip to main content
10.1145/3047273.3047322acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Smart Twin Cities via Urban Operating System

Published:07 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper looks into how cities can offer joint digital services in the cross-border areas. By fact, most digital services are local and by large, most of them are developed in isolation from the neighbouring local governments, either national or international. In the digital area, this is a huge challenge, as independently developed digital services tend to be locked-in to specific standards making future cross-border services challenging. We propose a model for joint digital services in the cross-border cities -- the Urban Operating System. The model will be validated in two Northern European cities with high commuting frequency: Helsinki and Tallinn.

References

  1. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Balakrishna, C. (2012). Enabling technologies for smart city services and applications. Proceedings - 6th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services, and Technologies, NGMAST 2012, 223--227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, a., Bazzani, a., Wachowicz, M., Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal: Special Topics, 214(1), 481--518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart Cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Scholl, H. J. (2011). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2289--2297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cugurullo, F. (2013). How to Build a Sandcastle: An Analysis of the Genesis and Development of Masdar City. Journal of Urban Technology, 20(1), 23--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dirks, S., & Keeling, M. (2009). A vision of smarter cities: How cities can lead the way into a prosperous and sustainable future. IBM Institute for Business Value. June, 1-6. Retrieved from http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/bus/pdf/ibm_podcast_smarter_cities.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna University of Technology. Retrieved from http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/37640170/smart_cities_final_report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Giffinger, R., & Haindlmaier, G. (2010). Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, 4(12), 7--26. Retrieved from http://upcommons.upc.edu/revistes/handle/2099/8550Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Graham, S. (2002). Bridging Urban Digital Divides? Urban. Urban Studies, 39(1), 33--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Greenfield, A. (2013). Against the smart city. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=adam+greenfield+against+the+smart+city&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=#0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12(3), 303--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kuk, G., & Janssen, M. (2011). The Business Models and Information Architectures of Smart Cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 39--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lee, J. H., Phaal, R., & Lee, S. H. (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 286--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lee, J., & Hancock, M. G. (2012). Toward a framework for Smart Cities: A Comparison of Seoul, San Francisco & Amsterdam Smart Green City Projects:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2014). Developing and validating a citizen-centric typology for smart city services. Government Information Quarterly, 31(SUPPL.1), S93--S105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Manville, C., Cochrane, G., Cave, J., Millard, J., Pederson, J. K., Thaarup, R. K., ... Kotterink, B. (2014). Mapping Smart Cities in the EU, 200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. a. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times - Dg.o '11, 282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities (Vol. 38).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Papa, R., Gargiulo, C., & Galderisi, A. (2013). Towards an Urban Planners' Perspective on Smart City. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 6(1), 6--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Paskaleva, K. A. (2011). The smart city: A nexus for open innovation? Intelligent Buildings International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ratti, C. and Nabian, N. (2010). Virtual Space, The City to Come (Chapter). Innovation. Perspectives for the 21st Century, 383--397. BBVAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Washburn, D., & Sindhu, U. (2009). Helping CIOs Understand "Smart City" Initiatives. Growth, 17. Retrieved from http://c3328005.r5.cf0.rackcdn.com/73efa931-0fac-4e28-ae77-8e58ebf74aa6.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Smart Twin Cities via Urban Operating System

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
      March 2017
      657 pages
      ISBN:9781450348256
      DOI:10.1145/3047273

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 March 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader