skip to main content
10.1145/3051488.3051509acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrehabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Computer-assisted assessment of cognitive functioning in the elderly through the systemic Lisbon battery

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The elderly population is growing fast mainly in the industrialized countries. Ageing is associated with different morbidities including cognitive impairments that limit the ability of these individuals to carry out their daily life activities. This study reports on the development of a computer-assisted approach for cognitive assessment in the elderly. The sample comprised old aged persons from a day care center that completed cognitive exercises in a non-immersive virtual reality system. The results showed correlations between the outcomes of these exercises and traditional neuropsychological tests, suggesting that performance in computer-assisted cognitive tasks replicates that of traditional neurocognitive tests, although further studies are needed to better understand the cognitive functions that underlying these cognitive exercises.

References

  1. Hedden, T., and Gabrieli, J.D.E. 2004. Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience. Nat. Rev.Neurosci. 5, 87--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Daulatzai, M. A. 2016. Cerebral Hypoperfusion and Glucose Hypometabolism: Key Pathophysiological Modulators Promote Neurodegeneration, Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Neuroscience Research.{Epub ahead of print}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jeannotte, L., and Moore, M. 2007. The State of aging and health in America 2007. Whitehouse Station, NJ: The Merck Company Foundation; 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Plassman, B.L., Langa, K.M., Fisher, G.G. et al. 2008. Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 148:427--434.Sannella, M. J. 1994. Constraint Satisfaction and Debugging for Interactive User Interfaces. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: UMI Order No. GAX95--09398., University of Washington.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Doerflinger, D.M.C. 2013. Mental status assessment of older adults: the Mini-Cog. Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, New York University, College of Nursing, Hartford (CT).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Parsons T. D. 2011. Neuropsychological assessment using virtual environments: enhanced assessment technology for improved ecological validity. In S. Brahnam (Ed.), Advanced Computational Intelligence Paradigms in Healthcare: Virtual Reality in Psychotherapy, Rehabilitation, and Assessment ( 271--289). Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Paula, J. J., Berttola, L., Ávila, R. T., Moreira, L., Coutinho, G., Moraes, E. N., et al. 2013. Clinical Applicability and Cutoff Values for an Unstructured Neuropsychological Assessment Protocol for Older Adults with Low Formal Education. PLOS One. 8(9).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lees-Haley, P. R., Smith, H. H., Williams, C. W., and Dunn, J.T. 1995 Forensic neuropsychological test usage: An empirical survey. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 11(1), 45--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., and Puente, A. E. 2000. Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 31, 141--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lima, C. F., Meireles, L. P., Fonseca, R., Castro, S. L., Garret, C. 2008. The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) in Parkinson's disease and correlations with formal measures of executive functioning. Journal of Neurology, 255, 1756--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chaytor N., and Schmitter-Edgecombe M. 2003. The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychology Review. 13(4), 181--197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Spooner D., and Pachana N. 2006. Ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment: A case for greater consideration in research with neurologically intact populations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 21, 327--337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Cernich, A. N., Brennana, D., M. Barker, L. M., and Bleiberg, J. 2007. Sources of error in computerized neuropsychological Assessment. Elsevier. 22, 39--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunton G.F., Dzubur E., Kawabata K., Yanez B., Bo B., and Intille S. 2014. Development of a smartphone application to measure physical activity using sensor-assisted self-report. Frontiers in Public Health. 2, 12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gamito P., Oliveira J., Brito R., Lopes P., Rodelo L., Pinto L, and Morais D. 2015. Evaluation of cognitive functions through the Systemic Lisbon Battery: normative data. Methods of Information in Medicine. 55(1), 93--97Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. & McHughm P. R. 1975. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 12, 189--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Nasreddine, Z., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., et al. 2005. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment. American Geriatrics Society, 52, 695--699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Freitas, S., Simões, M. R., Alves, L., and Santana, I. 2011. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Normative Study for the Portuguese population. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(9), 989--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Dubois, B., Slachevsky, A., Litvan, I., and Pillon, B. 2000. The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology55, 1621--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Osterrieth, P.A. 1944. "Filetest de copie d'une figure complex: Contribution a l'etude de la perception et de la memoire {The test of copying a complex figure: A contribution to the study of perception and memory}". Archives de Psychologie 30, 286--356.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Toulouse, E. and Pieron, H. 1986. Prueba perceptiva y de atención {Perceptive and attention test}. Madrid, Spain: Tea Ediciones.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J, Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., and Curtiss, G. 1993. Wisconsin card sorting test (WCST) --- manual revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheikh, J. I., and Yesavage, J. A. 1986. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In T.L. Brink (Ed.), Clinical Gerontology: A Guide to Assessment and Intervention (pp. 165--173). NY: The Haworth Press, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Computer-assisted assessment of cognitive functioning in the elderly through the systemic Lisbon battery

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      REHAB '16: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques
      October 2016
      135 pages
      ISBN:9781450347655
      DOI:10.1145/3051488

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader