skip to main content
research-article

DMAD: Data-Driven Measuring of Wi-Fi Access Point Deployment in Urban Spaces

Published:21 August 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Wireless networks offer many advantages over wired local area networks such as scalability and mobility. Strategically deployed wireless networks can achieve multiple objectives like traffic offloading, network coverage, and indoor localization. To this end, various mathematical models and optimization algorithms have been proposed to find optimal deployments of access points (APs).

However, wireless signals can be blocked by the human body, especially in crowded urban spaces. As a result, the real coverage of an on-site AP deployment may shrink to some degree and lead to unexpected dead spots (areas without wireless coverage). Dead spots are undesirable, since they degrade the user experience in network service continuity, on one hand, and, on the other hand paralyze some applications and services like tracking and monitoring when users are in these areas. Nevertheless, it is nontrivial for existing methods to analyze the impact of human beings on wireless coverage. Site surveys are too time consuming and labor intensive to conduct. It is also infeasible for simulation methods to predict the number of on-site people.

In this article, we propose DMAD, a Data-driven Measuring of Wi-Fi Access point Deployment, which not only estimates potential dead spots of an on-site AP deployment but also quantifies their severity, using simple Wi-Fi data collected from the on-site deployment and shop profiles from the Internet. DMAD first classifies static devices and mobile devices with a decision-tree classifier. Then it locates mobile devices to grid-level locations based on shop popularities, wireless signal, and visit duration. Last, DMAD estimates the probability of dead spots for each grid during different time slots and derives their severity considering the probability and the number of potential users.

The analysis of Wi-Fi data from static devices indicates that the Pearson Correlation Coefficient of wireless coverage status and the number of on-site people is over 0.7, which confirms that human beings may have a significant impact on wireless coverage. We also conduct extensive experiments in a large shopping mall in Shenzhen. The evaluation results demonstrate that DMAD can find around 70% of dead spots with a precision of over 70%.

References

  1. Martin D. Adickes, Richard E. Billo, Bryan A. Norman, Sujata Banerjee, Bartholomew O. Nnaji, and Jayant Rajgopal. 2002. Optimization of indoor wireless communication network layouts. IIE Trans. 34, 9 (2002), 823--836Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Paramvir Bahl and Venkata N. Padmanabhan. 2000. RADAR: An in-building rf-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM’00), Vol. 2. IEEE, 775--784.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kenneth Benoit. 2011. Linear regression models with logarithmic transformations. London School of Economics, London 22, 1 (2011), 23--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Nirupama Bulusu, John Heidemann, and Deborah Estrin. 2001. Adaptive beacon placement. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems 2001. IEEE, 489--498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Eyuphan Bulut and Boleslaw K. Szymanski. 2013. WiFi access point deployment for efficient mobile data offloading. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Comput. Commun. Rev. 17, 1 (2013), 71--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jason R. Chen. 2005. Making subsequence time series clustering meaningful. In Proceeings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’05). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Qiuyun Chen, Bang Wang, Xianjun Deng, Yijun Mo, and Laurence T. Yang. 2013. Placement of access points for indoor wireless coverage and fingerprint-based localization. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications and the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (HPCC_EUC’13). IEEE, 2253--2257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Manuel Crotti, Maurizio Dusi, Francesco Gringoli, and Luca Salgarelli. 2007. Traffic classification through simple statistical fingerprinting. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 37, 1 (2007), 5--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Steven J. Fortune, David M. Gay, Brian W. Kernighan, Orlando Landron, Reinaldo A. Valenzuela, and Margaret H. Wright. 1995. WISE design of indoor wireless systems: Practical computation and optimization. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. 2, 1 (1995), 58--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Julien Freudiger. 2015. How talkative is your mobile device?: An experimental study of wi-fi probe requests. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Security 8 Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks. ACM, 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Homayoun Hashemi. 1993. The indoor radio propagation channel. Proc. IEEE 81, 7 (1993), 943--968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. JaYeong Kim, Nah-Oak Song, Byoung Hoon Jung, Hansung Leem, and Dan Keun Sung. 2013. Placement of wifi access points for efficient wifi offloading in an overlay network. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC’13). IEEE, 3066--3070.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shahnaz Kouhbor, Julien Ugon, A. Rubinov, Alex Kruger, and M Mammadov. 2006. Coverage in WLAN with minimum number of access points. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference, Vol. 3. IEEE, 1166--1170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Peter Kreuzgruber, Thomas Brundl, Wolfgang Kuran, and Rainer Gahleitner. 1994. Prediction of indoor radio propagation with the ray splitting model including edge diffraction and rough surfaces. In Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE 44th Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE, 878--882.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Merima Kulin, Carolina Fortuna, Eli De Poorter, Dirk Deschrijver, and Ingrid Moerman. 2016. Data-driven design of intelligent wireless networks: An overview and tutorial. Sensors 16, 6 (2016), 790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lin Liao, Weifeng Chen, Chuanlin Zhang, Lizhuo Zhang, Dong Xuan, and Weijia Jia. 2011. Two birds with one stone: Wireless access point deployment for both coverage and localization. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. 60, 5 (2011), 2239--2252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Tao Liu and Alberto E. Cerpa. 2011. Foresee (4C): Wireless link prediction using link features. In Proceedings of the 2011 10th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’11). IEEE, 294--305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Tao Liu and Alberto E. Cerpa. 2014. Temporal adaptive link quality prediction with online learning. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 10, 3 (2014), 46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Weixiao Meng, Ying He, Zhian Deng, and Cheng Li. 2012. Optimized access points deployment for WLAN indoor positioning system. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC’12). IEEE, 2457--2461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. ABM Musa and Jakob Eriksson. 2012. Tracking unmodified smartphones using wi-fi monitors. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM, 281--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Revolutionwifi. 2013. Wi-Fi Site-Surveying 101. Retrieved from http://www.revolutionwifi.net/revolutionwifi/2013/08/wi-fi-site-surveying-101.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. T. Schoberl. 1995. Combined monte carlo simulation and ray tracing method of indoor radio propagation channel. In Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest. IEEE, 1379--1382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Souvik Sen, Romit Roy Choudhury, and Srihari Nelakuditi. 2012. SpinLoc: Spin once to know your location. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems 8 Applications. ACM, 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Chhavi Sharma, Yew Fai Wong, Wee-Seng Soh, and Wai-Choong Wong. 2010. Access point placement for fingerprint-based localization. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems (ICCS’10). IEEE, 238--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jiaxing Shen, Jiannong Cao, Xuefeng Liu, Jiaqi Wen, and Yuanyi Chen. 2016. Feature-based room-level localization of unmodified smartphones. In Smart City 360. Springer, 125--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ivan Vilovic, Niksa Burum, and Zvonimir Sipus. 2009. Ant colony approach in optimization of base station position. In 2009 3rd European Conference on Antennas and Propagation. IEEE, 2882--2886.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen-Shu Wang and Yi-Dung Chen. 2012. Base station deployment with capacity and coverage in WCDMA systems using genetic algorithm at different height. In Proceedings of the 2012 6th International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing (ICGEC’12). IEEE, 546--549. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Chen-Shu Wang and Li-Fang Kao. 2012. The optimal deployment of wi-fi wireless access points using the genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2012 Sixth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing (ICGEC’12). IEEE, 542--545. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Yan Wang, Jie Yang, Yingying Chen, Hongbo Liu, Marco Gruteser, and Richard P. Martin. 2014. Tracking human queues using single-point signal monitoring. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, 42--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Lyndon While and Chris McDonald. 2014. Optimising wi-fi installations using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference on Simulated Evolution and Learning. Springer, 747--759. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Chao-Lin Wu, Li-Chen Fu, and Feng-Li Lian. 2004. WLAN location determination in e-home via support vector classification. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Vol. 2. IEEE, 1026--1031.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Moustafa Youssef and Ashok Agrawala. 2005. The Horus WLAN location determination system. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, 205--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ji zeng Wang and Hongxu Jin. 2009. Improvement on APIT localization algorithms for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Networks Security, Wireless Communications and Trusted Computing 2009 (NSWCTC’09), Vol. 1. IEEE, 719--723. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Seyedjamal Zolhavarieh, Saeed Aghabozorgi, and Ying Wah Teh. 2014. A review of subsequence time series clustering. Sci. World J. 2014 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. DMAD: Data-Driven Measuring of Wi-Fi Access Point Deployment in Urban Spaces

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
        ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 9, Issue 1
        Regular Papers and Special Issue: Data-driven Intelligence for Wireless Networking
        January 2018
        258 pages
        ISSN:2157-6904
        EISSN:2157-6912
        DOI:10.1145/3134224
        • Editor:
        • Yu Zheng
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 August 2017
        • Accepted: 1 March 2017
        • Revised: 1 February 2017
        • Received: 1 November 2016
        Published in tist Volume 9, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader