skip to main content
10.1145/3067695.3075990acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Applying particle swarm optimization to the motion-cueing-algorithm tuning problem

Published:15 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The MCA tuning problem consists in finding the best values for the parameters/coefficients of Motion Cueing Algorithms (MCA). MCA are used to control the movements of robotic motion platforms employed to generate inertial cues in vehicle simulators. This problem is traditionally approached with a manual pilot-in-the-loop subjective tuning, based on the opinion of several pilots/drivers. Instead, this paper proposes applying Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to solve this problem, using simulated motion platforms and objective indicators rather than subjective opinions. Results show that PSO-based tuning can provide a suitable solution for this complex optimization problem.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Reymond, G. and A. Kemeny, Motion Cueing in the Renault Driving Simulator. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 2000. 34: p. 249--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sinacori, J.B., The Determination of Some Requirements for a Helicopter Flight Research Simulation Facility. 1977, Moffet Field: CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Reid, L. D. and M. A. Nahon, Flight Simulation Motion-Base Drive Algorithms: Part 1 - Developing and Testing the Equations. 1985, UTIAS: University of Toronto.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Reid, L. D. and M. A. Nahon, Flight Simulation Motion-Base Drive Algorithms: Part 2 - Selecting the System Parameters. 1986, UTIAS: University of Toronto.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Casas, S., et al., Motion-Cuing Algorithms: Characterization of Users' Perception. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2015. 57(1): p. 144--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Casas, S., et al., Towards a simulation-based tuning of motion cueing algorithms. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2016. 67: p. 137--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kennedy, J. and R. Eberhart. Particle Swarm Optimization. in IEEE International Conference. on Neural Networks. 1995. Perth, WA, Australia: IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shih-Wei, L., et al., Particle swarm optimization for parameter determination and feature selection of support vector machines. Expert Systems with Applications, 2008. 35: p. 1817--1824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Asadi, H, et al. A Particle Swarm Optimization-based washout filter for improving simulator motion fidelity, in Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. 2016. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Casas, S., et al., Towards an extensible simulator of real motion platforms. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2014. 45(0): p. 50--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Applying particle swarm optimization to the motion-cueing-algorithm tuning problem

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '17: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
          July 2017
          1934 pages
          ISBN:9781450349390
          DOI:10.1145/3067695

          Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 July 2017

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader