skip to main content
10.1145/3078072.3084316acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress
Public Access

Growing Designs with biomakerlab in High School Classrooms

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We report on the development and implementation of biomakerlab, a wetlab starter kit for synthetic biology activities in K-12. In synthetic biology, participants make their own DNA-gene by gene-and then grow their designs into real applications by inserting them into microorganisms to develop different traits and characteristics provided by the genes. High school students worked with biomakerlab to make logo designs using microorganisms they manipulated to produce differently colored pigments. Our analysis focuses on student engagement with production activities and design challenges in biomaking. In the discussion, we address differences and overlaps between traditional maker activities and biomaker activities for education.

References

  1. Philipp Boeing and Bethan Wolfenden. 2016. Bento Labs. (2016). Retrieved April 1, 2017 from https://www.bento.bio/ Figure 9. Using Sodium Alginate for Bacteria Encapsulation Figure 10. Creating a Glue Gun Outline for LogoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Vaille Dawson. 2007. An exploration of high school (12--17 year old) students' understandings of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Research in Science Education, 37 (March, 2007), 59--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jessica S Dymond, Lisa Z Scheifele, Sarah Richardson, Pablo Lee, Srinivasan Chandrasegaran, Joel S Bader, Jef D Boeke. 2009. Teaching Synthetic Biology, Bioinformatics and Engineering to Undergraduates: The Interdisciplinary Build-a-Genome Course. Genetics 181, 1 (January 2009), 13--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Finnish Bio Arts Society at Aalto University. 2015. Making Life (2015). Making Life Workshop Series. Retrieved March 1, 2017 from http://bioartsociety.fi/making_life/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniel Grushkin. 2017. Genspace. (2017). Retrieved April 1, 2017 from http://genspace.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Yasmin B. Kafai and Quinn Burke. 2014. Connected Code: Why Children Need to Learn Programming. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Denisa Kera. 2012. Hackerspaces and DIYbio in Asia: Connecting Science and Community with Open Data, Kits and Protocols. Journal of Peer Production, 2 (July 2012). Retrieved from: http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peerreviewed-papers/diybio-in-asia/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Natalie Kuldell, Rachel Bernstein, Karen Ingram and Kathryn M. Hart. 2015. Biobuilder: Synthetic Biology in the Lab. O'Reilly Media, Inc., San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Julie Legault and Justice Pahara. 2016. Amino Labs. (2016). Retrieved April 1, 2017 from http://www.amino.bioGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Rudolph Mitchell, Yehudit J. Dori, Natalie H. Kuldell. 2011. Experiential engineering through iGEM -- An undergraduate summer competition in synthetic biology. Journal of Science Educational Technology 20, 2 (April 2011), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Museum of Science, Boston. 2015. Building with Biology. (2015). Retrieved April 1, 2017 from http://www.mos.org/buildingwithbiology/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Seymour Papert. 1980. Mindstorms. Basic Books, NY, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kylie A. Peppler, Erica Halverson, and Yasmin B. Kafai, (Eds.). 2016a. Makeology: Makerspaces as Learning Environments (Volume 1). Routledge, NY, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kylie A. Peppler, Erica Halverson, and Yasmin B. Kafai, (Eds.). 2016b. Makeology: Makers as Learners (Volume 2). Routledge, NY, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitchel Resnick, Elyse Eidman-Adaahl, and Dale Dougherty. 2016. Making-Writing-Coding. In K. A. Peppler, E. Halverson, and Y. B. Kafai, (Eds.). 2016b. Makeology: Makers as Learners (Volume 2). Routledge, NY, NY, pp. 229--240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Orit Shaer, Consuelo Valdes, Sirui Liu, Kara Lu, Kimberly Chang, Wendy Xu, Traci L. Haddock, Swapnil Bhatia, Douglas Densmore and Robert Kincaid. 2013. Designing reality-based interfaces for experiential bio-design. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 18, 6 (November 2013), 1515--1532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. SymbioticA, The Arts Catalyst, UCL, Synthetic Aesthetics. 2011. Synthesis Exchange Laboratory organized by University College London. Retrieved April 1, 2017 from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/synbion/network/SynthesisGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. SymbioticA. 2016. The Centre of Excellence in Biological Arts, School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology. Perth, AU: The University of Western Australia. Retrieved from April 1, 2017 from http://www.symbiotica.uwa.edu.au/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Orkan Telhan and Karen Hogan. 2015. Biorealize. (2015). Retrieved April 1, 2017 from http://www.biorealize.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Orkan Telhan. 2016. Design.bio: Biology at the design studio. Biocoder#11, (November 2016), 3343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Growing Designs with biomakerlab in High School Classrooms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IDC '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children
      June 2017
      808 pages
      ISBN:9781450349215
      DOI:10.1145/3078072

      Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 June 2017

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress

      Acceptance Rates

      IDC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate25of118submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

      Upcoming Conference

      IDC '24
      Interaction Design and Children
      June 17 - 20, 2024
      Delft , Netherlands

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader