ABSTRACT
Autonomous technology is becoming more prevalent in our daily lives. We investigated how children perceive this technology by studying how 26 participants (3-10 years old) interact with Amazon Alexa, Google Home, Cozmo, and Julie Chatbot. We refer to them as "agents" in the context of this paper. After playing with the agents, children answered questions about trust, intelligence, social entity, personality, and engagement. We identify four themes in child-agent interaction: perceived intelligence, identity attribution, playfulness and understanding. Our findings show how different modalities of interaction may change the way children perceive their intelligence in comparison to the agents'. We also propose a series of design considerations for future child-agent interaction around voice and prosody, interactive engagement and facilitating understanding.
- Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. 2009. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International journal of social robotics 1, 1 (2009), 71--81.Google Scholar
- Debra Bernstein and Kevin Crowley. 2008. Searching for signs of intelligent life: An investigation of young children's beliefs about robot intelligence. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 17, 2 (2008), 225--247.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter H Kahn Jr, Batya Friedman, Deanne R Perez-Granados, and Nathan G Freier. 2006. Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies 7, 3 (2006), 405--436.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hae Won Park, Rinat Rosenberg-Kima, Maor Rosenberg, Goren Gordon, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2017. Growing growth mindset with a social robot peer. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Najmeh Sadoughi, André Pereira, Rishub Jain, Iolanda Leite, and Jill Fain Lehman. 2017. Creating Prosodic Synchrony for a Robot Co-player in a Speech-controlled Game for Children. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 91--99. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fumihide Tanaka, Aaron Cicourel, and Javier R Movellan. 2007. Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 46 (2007), 17954--17958.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sherry Turkle. 2005. The second self: Computers and the human spirit. Mit Press.Google Scholar
- Henry M Wellman, David Cross, and Julanne Watson. 2001. Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child development 72, 3 (2001), 655--684.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- "Hey Google is it OK if I eat you?": Initial Explorations in Child-Agent Interaction
Recommendations
How smart are the smart toys?: children and parents' agent interaction and intelligence attribution
IDC '18: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenIntelligent toys and smart devices are becoming ubiquitous in children's homes. As such, it is imperative to understand how these computational objects impact children's development. Children's attribution of intelligence relates to how they perceive ...
Hey Google, Do Unicorns Exist?: Conversational Agents as a Path to Answers to Children's Questions
IDC '19: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenChildren are known to be curious and persistent questionaskers. The pervasiveness of voice interfaces represents an opportunity for children who are not yet fluent readers to independently search the Internet by asking questions through conversational ...
"My doll says it's ok": a study of children's conformity to a talking doll
IDC '18: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenToday's children are growing up with smart toys, Internet-connected devices that use artificial intelligence to drive interactive play. In a prior research study, we found that children ages 4--10 perceive these toys as worthy of trust [5]. This leads ...
Comments