skip to main content
10.1145/3083671.3083684acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Integrating mobile technologies to achieve community development goals: the case of telecenters in Brazil

Published:26 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Telecenters and mobile technologies are two of the main interventions for reducing the digital divide and are primary tools for information access. The rapid and pervasive adoption of mobile technologies had called into question the necessity of continued investment in telecenters; however, telecenters have been credited for serving different needs than private mobile technologies. Users and stakeholders are shaping new ways of access, and telecenters and mobile technologies can benefit from each other to address the issue of underserved communities' access to information. The literature has not yet extensively addressed this topic. The study presented in this paper has the twofold goal to understand (i) how mobile technologies are used by telecenters to enhance their services to the public, and (ii) whether telecenter operators perceive mobile technologies as viable instruments to innovate telecenters and pursue community development goals. Informed by the Theory of Social Representations (SR), the study presents responses to a questionnaire to Brazilian telecenter operators. Results show that telecenter operators have a positive attitude towards adopting mobile technologies to extend their telecenters' services and meet their development goals, especially in the areas of education, knowledge, information and communication.

References

  1. J.C. Abric. 1994. L'organisation interne des représentations sociales: système central et système périphérique. In Structures et transformations des représentations sociales (C. Guimelli). Delachaux et Niestlé, Neuchâtel, 73--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Oluniyi Ajao. 2010. Are Mobile Phones Pushing Cyber Cafes Out of Business? ICT Works. Retrieved February 14, 2017 from http://www.ictworks.org/2010/05/10/are-mobile-phones-pushing-cyber-cafes-out-business/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arlene Bailey and Ojelanki Ngwenyama. 2011. The challenge of e-participation in the digital city: Exploring generational influences among community telecentre users. Telematics and Informatics 28, 3: 204--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Francois Bar, Chris Coward, Lucas Koepke, Chris Rothschild, Araba Sey, and George Sciadas. 2013. The Impact of Public Access to ICTs: Findings from a Five-year, Eight-country Study. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers - Volume 1 (ICTD '13), 34--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Martin W. Bauer and George Gaskell. 1999. Towards a Paradigm for Research on Social Representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29, 2: 163--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Paolo Brunello. 2015. Broken Premises: Towards an Intercultural Understanding of Bilateral Co-operation in ICT for Education in Burundi. Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK. Retrieved from https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/broken-premises-towards-an-intercultural-understanding-of-bilateral-cooperation-in-icts-for-education-in-burundi(ed7d06ce-047b-4039-a342-5500223842ad).htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jovan Byford. 2002. Anchoring and objectifying "neocortical warfare": Representation of a biological metaphor in serbian conspiracy literature. Papers on Social Representations 11, 3: 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Wallace Chigona, Ofentse Lekwane, Kim Westcott, and Agnes Chigona. 2011. Uses, Benefits and Challenges of Public Access Points in the Face of Growth of Mobile Technology. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 49, 0. Retrieved February 25, 2014 from https://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2/index.php/ejisdc/article/view/866Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Alina M. Chircu and Vijay Mahajan. 2009. PERSPECTIVE: Revisiting the Digital Divide: An Analysis of Mobile Technology Depth and Service Breadth in the BRIC Countries. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26, 4: 455--466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. D. Colle. 2005. Memo to Telecenter Planners. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 21, 0. Retrieved February 17, 2014 from https://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2/index.php/ejisdc/article/view/136Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. D. Colle and Raul Roman. 2001. The Telecenter Environment in 2002. The Journal of Development Communication 12, 2: 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Alberta Contarello, Leopoldina Fortunati, and Mauro Sarrica. 2007. Social Thinking and the Mobile Phone: a Study of Social Change with the Diffusion of Mobile Phones, Using a Social Representations Framework. Continuum 21, 2: 149--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sheryl Day. 2015. Mobile Information Literacy Curriculum. Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies (JSIS) & Technology and Social Change Group (TASCHA), University of Washington. Retrieved from http://tascha.uw.edu/mobile-information-literacy-curriculum/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jonathan Donner. 2010. Framing M4D: The Utility of Continuity and the Dual Heritage of "Mobiles and Development." The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 44, 0. Retrieved February 25, 2014 from https://144.214.55.140/Ojs2/index.php/ejisdc/article/view/746Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jonathan Donner. 2015. After Access: Inclusion, Development, and a More Mobile Internet. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jonathan Donner and Marion Walton. 2013. Your phone has internet - why are you at a library PC? Re-imagining public access for the mobile internet era. Microsoft Research. Retrieved February 14, 2017 from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/your-phone-has-internet-why-are-you-at-a-library-pc-re-imagining-public-access-for-the-mobile-internet-era/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Andrew Feenberg. 2000. From essentialism to constructivism: Philosophy of technology at the crossroads. In Technology and the good life. University of Chicago Press, 294--315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Espírito Santo Globo.com. 2016. Candidatos à prefeitura de Vitória participam de 2o debate na TV Gazeta. Eleições 2016 no Espírito Santo. Retrieved February 14, 2017 from http://g1.globo.com/espirito-santo/eleicoes/2016/noticia/2016/10/candidatos-prefeitura-de-vitoria-participam-de-2-debate-na-tv-gazeta.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ricardo Gómez. 2013. The Changing Field of ICTD: Growth and maturation of the field, 2000--2010. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 58, 0. Retrieved July 26, 2013 from http://ejisdc.org/ojs2/index.php/ejisdc/article/view/1155Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Michael Gurstein. 2011. Telecentres are not "Sustainable": Get Over It! Retrieved May 14, 2014 from http://gurstein.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/telecentres-or-community-access-centres-or-public-interest-access-centres-or-community-technology-centres-etc-etc-are-not-"sustainable"-get-over-it/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Richard Heeks. 2003. Most eGovernment-for-Development Projects Fail: How Can Risks be Reduced? School of Environment and Development - The University of Manchester. Retrieved June 28, 2013 from http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/igovernment/igov_wp14.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Richard Heeks. 2008. ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development. Computer 41, 6: 26--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Richard Jones. 2013. Telecenters: Providing the "Spark" for global community engagement. devex. Retrieved May 8, 2014 from https://www.devex.com/news/telecenters-providing-the-spark-for-global-community-engagement-80925Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sandra Jovchelovitch. 2007. Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Dorothea Kleine. 2013. Technologies of Choice?: ICTs, Development, and the Capabilities Approach. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Dorothea Kleine and Tim Unwin. 2009. Technological Revolution, Evolution and New Dependencies: what's new about ict4d? Third World Quarterly 30, 5:1045--1067.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Agnes Kukulska-Hulme, Mike Sharples, Marcelo Milrad, Inmaculada Arnedillo-Sanchez, and Giasemi Vavoula. 2009. Innovation in Mobile Learning: A European Perspective. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 1, 1: 13--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Rajendra Kumar and Michael L. Best. 2007. Social Impact and Diffusion of Telecenter Use: A Study from the Sustainable Access in Rural India Project. The Journal of Community Informatics 2, 3. Retrieved February 14, 2017 from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/328Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Harsha Liyanage. 2009. Sustainability First. In search of telecentre sustainability. Sarvodaya Fusion, telecentre.org, Kotte. Retrieved February 27, 2014 from http://www.bookrix.com/_ebook-harsha-liyanage-ph-d-sustainability-first/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ivana Markovà. 2003. Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Caroline Maury. 2007. Social representations: a tool box. Know&Pol - Knowledge and Policy in education and health sectors. Retrieved from http://knowandpol.eu/IMG/pdf/lr.11.maury.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mayanja Meddie. 2007. Rethinking telecentre sustainability approaches. The Journal of Community Informatics 2, 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Global Technology & Telecom Morgan Stanley Research. 2009. The Mobile Internet Report. Morgan Stanley Research, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Serge Moscovici. 1961. La Psychanalyse, son image et son public. Presses Universitaires de France - PUF, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Serge Moscovici. 2000. Social Representations: Studies in Social Psychology. Polity Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. David Nemer. 2015. Rethinking digital inequalities: The experience of the marginalized in community technology centers. Indiana University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. David Nemer. 2015. Wired Smartphones: Rethinking the role of community technology centers in the mobile Internet era. GlobDev 2015. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/globdev2015/4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Celso Pereira de Sá. 1996. The central nucleus approach to social representations. Retrieved from http://www2.lse.ac.uk/methodologyInstitute/pdf/QualPapers/CELSO-Coreperiphery.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Karen E. Pettigrew, R. Fidel, and H. Bruce. 2001. Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. In Annual review of information science and technology (ARIST). 43--78. Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/fidelr/RayaPubs/ConceptualFrameworks.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Paola Prado. 2011. Lighting up the Dark: Telecenter Adoption in a Caribbean Agricultural Community. The Journal of Community Informatics 6, 3. Retrieved February 14, 2017 from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/727Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Isabella Rega. 2010. What do local people think about telecentres? A key issue for sustainability. Università della Svizzera italiana - USI, Lugano, Switzerland. Retrieved June 23, 2013 from http://amala.rero.ch/record/17990?ln=deGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Isabella Rega, Sara Vannini, Miguel Raimilla, and Laia Fauró. 2013. Telecentres and Mobile: an initial overview. Associazione seed. Retrieved from http://seedlearn.org/telecentres-and-mobile-technologies-global-pilot-study/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Ricardo Gomez. 2012. Libraries, telecentres, cybercafes and public access to ICT: international comparisons. Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Roxanna Samii. 2009. Mobile phones: the silver bullet to bridge the digital divide? Participatory Learning and Action, 59: 44--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Mauro Sarrica. 2011. ICTs Meanings and Practices: Contributions from the Social Representation Approach. The Journal of Community Informatics 6, 3. Retrieved October 8, 2013 from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/731Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Araba Sey, Chris Coward, F. Bar, G. Sciadas, Chris Rothschild, and Lucas Koepke. 2013. Connecting people for development: Why public access ICTs matter. Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School., Seattle, WA. Retrieved from http://tascha.uw.edu/publications/connecting-people-for-developmentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Professor Dr Mike Sharples, Prof Dr Josie Taylor, and Dr Giasemi Vavoula. 2010. A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age. In Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen, Prof Dr Ben Bachmair (ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 87--99. Retrieved March 16, 2016 from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-531-92133-4_6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Chad C. Tossell, Philip Kortum, Clayton Shepard, Ahmad Rahmati, and Lin Zhong. 2015. You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him learn: Smartphone use in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology 46, 4: 713--724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. David N. Townsend, Daniel Espitia G., Sonia N. Jorge, and Christopher B. Lee. 2001. Telecenters and Telecommunications Development: Options and Strategies. DNTA. Retrieved October 10, 2010 from http://wsispapers.choike.org/options_strategies.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Kentaro Toyama. 2015. Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from the Cult of Technology. PublicAffairs, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Tim Unwin (ed.). 2009. ICT4D: Information and Communication Technology for Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Sara Vannini. 2014. Social Representations of Community Multimedia Centres in Mozambique. Università della Svizzera italiana - USI, Lugano, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://doc.rero.ch/record/210253?ln=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Sara Vannini and Isabella Rega. 2012. Inbound and Outbound Information and Communication flows: Perspectives from Community Multimedia Centres in Mozambique. In Proceedings of the 9th Community Informatics Conference: Ideals meet Reality.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Sara Vannini, Isabella Rega, Simone Sala, and Lorenzo Cantoni. 2015. Using Photo-Elicitation to Explore Social Representations of Community Multimedia Centers in Mozambique. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 67, 0. Retrieved February 27, 2015 from http://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2/index.php/ejisdc/article/view/1297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. P Vergès, C Junique, W Barbry, S Scano, and R Zeliger. 2002. Ensembles de programmes permettant l'analyse de similitude de questionnaires et de données numeriques. Aix en Provence: Université Aix en Provence (Manual).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Pierre Vergès. 1992. L'évocation de l'argent: une méthode pour la definition du noyau central d'une représentation. Bulletin de Psychologie XLV, 405: 203--209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Wolfgang Wagner, Gerard Duveen, Robert Farr, Sandra Jovchelovitch, Fabio Lorenzi-Cioldi, Ivana Marková, and Diana Rose. 1999. Theory and Method of Social Representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2, 1: 95--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Sean Wallace, Marcia Clark, and Jonathan White. 2012. "It"s on my iPhone': attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2, 4: e001099.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. M. Walton and J. Donner. 2012. Public access, private mobile: The interplay of shared access and the mobile Internet for teenagers in Cape Town. Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Gudrun Wicander. 2010. M4D Overview 1.0: the 2009 Introduction to Mobile for Development. Karlstads universitet, Karlstad. Retrieved February 25, 2014 from http://kau.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:320676/FULLTEXT02Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Judy Young, G Ridley, and Jeff Ridley. 2001. A preliminary evaluation of online access centres: Promoting micro e-business activity in small, isolated communities. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries: 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Integrating mobile technologies to achieve community development goals: the case of telecenters in Brazil

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        C&T '17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies
        June 2017
        345 pages
        ISBN:9781450348546
        DOI:10.1145/3083671

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 June 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        C&T '17 Paper Acceptance Rate34of66submissions,52%Overall Acceptance Rate80of183submissions,44%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader