skip to main content
10.1145/3083671.3083692acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Starting up an E-Mentoring Relationship: A User Study

Published:26 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) tools offer new ways for collaboration between distant parties (e.g., e-mentoring). However, this way of collaboration brings along diverse challenges, e.g., setting up a mentoring relationship in the absence of face-to-face meetings. Within a user study with eight mentor-mentee pairs, we investigated how this initial contact can be supported via an online platform. We explored what kind of communication channels are considered useful and to what extent participants reached mutual understanding (common ground). The results indicate that although participants preferred text messaging for the first contact, almost all switched to audio or video calls during the conversation to establish more closeness during the communication.

References

  1. Laura L Bierema and Sharan B Merriam. 2002. E-mentoring: Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education 26, 3 (2002), 211--227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Gregorio Convertino, Helena M. Mentis, Aleksandra Slavkovic, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2011. Supporting Common Ground and Awareness in Emergency Management Planning: A Design Research Project. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 4, Article 22 (Dec. 2011), 34 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Paul De Greef and Wijnand A Ijsselsteijn. 2001. Social presence in a home tele-application. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4, 2 (2001), 307--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ellen A Ensher, Christian Heun, and Anita Blanchard. 2003. Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior 63, 2 (2003), 264--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Isolina Oliveira, Luis Tinoca, and AldaPereira. 2011. Online group work patterns: How to promote a successful collaboration. Computers & Education 57, 1 (2011), 1348--1357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nancy Philippart and Julia Gluesing. 2012. Global e-mentoring: Overcoming virtual distance for an effective partnership. In Proc. of the 4th international conference on Intercultural Collaboration. ACM, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mayring Phillip. 2008. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz Deutscher Studien Verlag 6 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Catherine Sinclair. 2003. Mentoring online about mentoring: Possibilities and practice. Mentoring and Tutoring 11, 1 (2003), 79--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Starting up an E-Mentoring Relationship: A User Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      C&T '17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies
      June 2017
      345 pages
      ISBN:9781450348546
      DOI:10.1145/3083671

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      C&T '17 Paper Acceptance Rate34of66submissions,52%Overall Acceptance Rate80of183submissions,44%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader