Aditya Johri
ABSTRACT
Online communities, often in the form of discussion forums, encapsulate the very notion of "doing good with technology" by serving as a conduit for help-seeking and problem-solving by users who volunteer their time and effort. One form of helping is assisting others with learning new content, an under-examined topic within the context of online communities, and in this paper we present a study investigating how online discussion forums go beyond informational support and guide newcomers' learning. We analyzed a forum dedicated to helping newcomers learn the programming language Java™. Using an empirical approach that combined analysis of forum data with interviews with expert we found that experts consciously and collaboratively scaffolded newcomers' learning by creating shared understanding, providing ongoing diagnosis, and fading their help over time. Multiple resources were leveraged for scaffolding and learners often received personalized instruction through collaborative contributions of multiple experts on the forum.
- Arsal, I., Woosnam, K.M., Baldwin, E.D., & Backman, S.J. (2010). Residents as travel destination information providers: An online community perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 49(4), 400--413.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Alagoz, E. (2013). Social argumentation in online synchronous communication. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(4), 399--426.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aschoff, F., Schaer, V., & Schwabe, G. (2011). Where should I send my post?: the concept of discourse quality in online forums and its dependency on membership size. In Proceedings of Communities and Technologies (C&T '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 69--78. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Azevedo, R. & Hadwin, A. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition -- Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367--379.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bagley, C. A., & Chou, C. C. (2007). Collaboration and the importance for novices in learning java computer programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(3), 211--215. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bassani, P. (2011). Interpersonal exchanges in discussion forums: A study of learning communities in distance learning settings. Computers & Education, Vol.56 (4): 931--938. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beckwith, L., Kissinger, C., Burnett, M., Wiedenbeck, S., Lawrance, J., Blackwell, A. & Cook, C. (2006). Tinkering and gender in end-user programmers' debugging. Proceedings of CHI (2006, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) (pp. 231--240). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bliss, J. Askew, M. & Macrae, S. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Scaffolding revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 22 (1), 37--61.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brandt, J., Guo, P. J., Lewenstein, J., Dontcheva, M., & Klemmer, S. R. (2009). Two studies of opportunistic programming: interleaving web foraging, learning, and writing code. Proceedings of CHI (2009, Boston, MA, USA) (pp. 1589--1598). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bruckman, A. (2006). Learning in online communities. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp. 461--472.Google Scholar
- Case, D.O. (2010). A model of the information seeking and decision making of online coin buyers. Information Research, 15(4). Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/15-4/paper448.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Harper, F. M., Raban, D., Rafaeli, S., & Konstan, J. A. (2008). Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. Proceedings of CHI (2008, Florence, Italy) (pp. 865--874). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hristova, M., Misra, A., Rutter, M., & Mercuri, R. (2003). Identifying and correcting Java programming errors for introductory computer science students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1), 153--156. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johri, A., Nov, O. & Mitra, R. (2011). Environmental Jolts: Impact of Exogenous Factors on Online Community Participation. Proceedings of CSCW, pp. 649--652. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lajoie, S. (2005) Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science, 33, 541--557.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mitra, R., Johri, A. & Nov, O. (2013). Effect of External Events on Newcomer Participation in Open Source Online Communities. First Monday, Vol. 18, No. 6, 3-June-2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mugar, G., Østerlund, C., Jackson, C., Crowston, K. (2015). Being present in online communities: learning in citizen science. In Proceedings of Communities and Technologies (C&T 15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pea, R. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423--451.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ploderer, B., Smith, W., Howard, S., Pearce, J., & Borland, R. (2013). Patterns of support in an online community for smoking cessation. In Proceedings of Communities and Technologies (C&T 13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 26--35. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science by design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185--217.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Puntambekar, S. & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1--12.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Puustinen, M., Bernicot, J., Volckaert-Legrier, O. & Baker, M. (2015). Naturally occurring help-seeking exchanges on a homework help forum, Computers & Education, Vol. 81, pg. 89--101. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Quintana, C., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2002). A case study to distill structural scaffolding guidelines for scaffolded software environments. Proceedings of CHI (pp. 81--88). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Golan, R., Kyza, E. A., et al. (2004). Evolving a scaffolding design framework for designing educational software. Journal of Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337--386.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reiser, B. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273--304.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reiser, B. J. (2002). Why Scaffolding Should Sometimes Make Tasks More Difficult for Learners. Proceedings of CSCL 2002, pg. 255--264. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in sociocultural activity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Spohrer, J. & Soloway, E. (1985). Putting it all together is hard for novice programmers. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 728--735).Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305--335.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Teo, H. J. & Johri, A. (2014). Fast, functional, and fitting: expert response dynamics and response quality in an online newcomer help forum. In Proceedings of CSCW '14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 332--341. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Teo, H. J., Johri, A. & Mitra, R. (2013). Experts Learn More (than Newcomers): An Exploratory Study of Argumentation in an Online Help Forum. Proceedings of CSCL, Wisconsin, MI, USA.Google Scholar
- van de Sande, C. (2009). Grassroots open, online, calculus help forums. Proceedings of CSCL (pp. 43--47). Google ScholarDigital Library
- van de Sande, C. (2011). A description and characterization of student activity in an open, online, mathematics help forum. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(1), 53 --78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wimmer, R. D. and Dominick, J. R. (2000). Mass Media Research: An Introduction (6th ed). New York, NY: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89--100.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Scaffolded Help for Learning: How Experts Collaboratively Support Newcomer Participation in Online Communities
Recommendations
How is learning scaffolded in library makerspaces?
AbstractLibraries have adopted makerspaces to promote a maker mindset and skills in using technology. In this paper, we examine how learning is scaffolded in library makerspaces. Based on interviews in fourteen Danish library makerspaces, we ...
Pre-service teachers' experiences of scaffolded learning in science through a computer supported collaborative inquiry
Scaffolding helps the novice to accomplish a task goal or solve a problem that otherwise would be beyond unassisted efforts. Scaffolding firstly aims to support the learner in accomplishing the task and secondly in learning from the task and improving ...
Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments
AbstractTechnology is ubiquitous in the modern world; to harness its educational potential in the quest to introduce environments that are flexible and differentiate for individual student learning needs, the strategic use of the complex array ...
Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted
Highlights- Students are provided the online learning modules in the absence of teacher and peer support.
Comments