Anne L. Washington
ABSTRACT
This exploratory interpretive case study investigated the collaborative potential of open government data available through data.gov, the US federal open data catalog. Open data is a central aspect of open government collaboration because it fosters exchange and communication between governments and the public. Government organizations that release open data make choices about file formats that have a substantial impact on the potential for collaboration. A file format, such as a document or a spreadsheet, is a constraint on which programs can read the file and what actions a user can do with the file. Overall, we found data.gov formats with limited collaboration potential but files that could be accessed by people with a wide range of skills. The findings are incorporated into suggestions for future iterations of open data policy. The advantages and limitations of using file formats for open data research are considered. The exploratory findings raise questions about future user-centric open data evaluations.
- Attard, J. et al. 2015. A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly. 32, 4 (Oct. 2015), 399--418.Google Scholar
- Atz, U. et al. 2015. Benchmarking open data automatically. Technical Report #ODI-TR-2015-0000 UK20150105. Open Data Institute.Google Scholar
- Berners-Lee, T. 2006. Linked Data - Design Issues.Google Scholar
- Bertot, J.C. 2006. User-centered e-government: Challenges and benefits for government Web sites (an editorial). Government Information Quarterly. 23, 2 (2006), 163--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Braman, S. 2011. Defining Information Policy. Journal of Information Policy. 1, 0 (Feb. 2011).Google Scholar
- Clarke, A. and Margetts, H. 2014. Governments and Citizens Getting to Know Each Other? Open, Closed, and Big Data in Public Management Reform. Policy & Internet. 6, 4 (Dec. 2014), 393--417.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cruz, N.F. da et al. 2016. Measuring Local Government Transparency. Public Management Review. 18, 6 (Jul. 2016), 866--893.Google Scholar
- Dawes, S.S. 2010. Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly. 27, 4 (Oct. 2010), 377--383.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dawes, S.S. et al. 2016. Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly. 33, 1 (Jan. 2016), 15--27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Evans, A.M. and Campos, A. 2013. Open Government Initiatives: Challenges of Citizen Participation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 32, 1 (Winter 2013), 172--185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gonzalez-Zapata, F. and Heeks, R. 2015. The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Government Information Quarterly. 32, 4 (Oct. 2015), 441--452.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harrison, T.M. et al. 2012. Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda. Future Internet. 4, 4 (Oct. 2012), 900--928.Google Scholar
- Heald, D. 2006. Varieties of Transparency. Transparency: the key to better governance?. C. Hood and D. Heald, eds. Oxford University Press. 3.Google Scholar
- Horrigan, J.B. and Rainie, L. 2015. Users' Views on Potential Impacts of Open Data and Open Government. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
- Jaeger, P.T. 2007. Information policy, information access, and democratic participation: The national and international implications of the Bush administration's information politics. Government Information Quarterly. 24, 4 (2007), 840--859.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Janssen, M. et al. 2012. Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management. 29, 4 (Fall 2012), 258--268.Google Scholar
- Janssen, M. and Zuiderwijk, A. 2014. Infomediary Business Models for Connecting Open Data Providers and Users. Social Science Computer Review. 32, 5 (Oct. 2014), 694--711. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kapoor, K. et al. 2015. Open Data Platforms and Their Usability: Proposing a Framework for Evaluating Citizen Intentions. Open and Big Data Management and Innovation. M. Janssen et al., eds. Springer International Publishing. 261--271.Google Scholar
- Lakhani, K.R. et al. 2009. Data.gov. Technical Report #HBS No. 9-610-075. Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lee, A.S. 1989. A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies. MIS Quarterly. 13, 1 (1989), 32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee, G. and Kwak, Y.H. 2012. An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly. 29, 4 (Oct. 2012), 492--503.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leonelli, S. 2013. Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 33, 1--2 (Feb. 2013), 6--11.Google Scholar
- Linders, D. and Wilson, S.C. 2011. What is Open Government?: One Year After the Directive. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 262--271. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luna-Reyes, L.F. et al. 2014. Open Government, Open Data and Digital Government. Government Information Quarterly. 31, 1 (Jan. 2014), 4--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McDermott, P. 2010. Building open government. Government Information Quarterly. 27, 4 (2010), 401--413.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meijer, A.J. and Thaens, M. 2009. Public information strategies: Making government information available to citizens. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age. 14, 1--2 (2009), 31--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Myers, M.D. 2009. Qualitative research in business and management. Sage.Google Scholar
- Obama, B. 2009. Transparency and Open Government.Google Scholar
- Peled, A. 2011. When transparency and collaboration collide: The USA Open Data program. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62, 11 (Nov. 2011), 2085--2094. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susha, I. et al. 2015. Benchmarks for Evaluating the Progress of Open Data Adoption Usage, Limitations, and Lessons Learned. Social Science Computer Review. 33, 5 (Oct. 2015), 613--630. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ubaldi, B. 2013. Open Government Data - Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives. Technical Report #22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
- Veljković, N. et al. 2014. Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Government Information Quarterly. 31, 2 (Apr. 2014), 278--290.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Viscusi, G. et al. 2014. Compliance with Open Government Data Policies: An Empirical Assessment of Italian Local Public Administrations. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age. 19, 3/4 (2014), 263--275. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wirtz, B.W. and Birkmeyer, S. 2015. Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration. 38, 5 (Apr. 2015), 381--396.Google Scholar
- Yang, T.-M. et al. 2014. How is information shared across the boundaries of government agencies? An e-Government case study. Government Information Quarterly. 31, 4 (Oct. 2014), 637--652.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yin, R.K. 2009. Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Open Government Data and File Formats: Constraints on Collaboration
Recommendations
Liberating data for public value
Public agencies around the globe are liberating their data. Drawing on a case of Data.gov, we outline the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for the liberation of public data. Data.gov is an online portal that provides open access to datasets ...
Open Government Data Policy and Indian Ecosystems
ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceIn a developing country like India, with complex issues at hand evidence-based Planning of socio-economic development processes must rely on quality data. As quality data is not easily accessible, there is a general need to facilitate sharing and ...
Open Government Data as a Right for Effective Citizen Participation
ICEGOV '15-16: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceOpen Government Data (OGD) is where the public sector relinquishes its role as information gatekeeper and become information provider. This realigns power dynamics between the public and private sectors. Open and transparent governments are more ...
Comments