skip to main content
10.1145/3091478.3091479acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Privacy for Children and Teenagers on Social Networks from a Usability Perspective: A Case Study on Facebook

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Children and teenagers comprise a user group particularly susceptible to privacy infringement risks in Online Social Networks (OSNs). In this sense, the usability of privacy controls should be appropriate to such users. This study aims to characterize, through a case study on Facebook, how children and teenagers deal with privacy features on OSNs and whether the available privacy controls help this user group to manage the privacy levels of their personal data. The case study considered children and teenagers in Brazil, the top-3 country on the number of Facebook users. The results indicated that there are usability violations that hinder this group from adjusting privacy settings, compromising its privacy and security on OSNs. These results are relevant and not limited to the context of Brazil, because they warn us about the vulnerability of children and teenagers on OSNs, as well as they evince the role of usability in privacy controls.

References

  1. Abdulmohsen Albesher and Thamer Alhussain. 2013. Privacy and security issues in social networks: an evaluation of Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication (ISDOC '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ocimara Balmant, O. 2012. Cresce exposição de jovens na internet. O Estado de São Paulo, Caderno Vida, p.27, 02 dez 2012. Estadão Geral. Available in: http://www.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,cresce-exposicao-de-jovens-na-internet-imp-,968026. Last access: Dec 23, 2016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Danah Boyd, Eszter Hargittai, Jason Schultz, and John Palfrey. 2011. Why Parents Help Their Children Lie to Facebook: Unintended Consequences of the 'Children's Online Privacy Protection Act'. First Monday, 16(11), November 7, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Parmit Chilana, Christina Holsberry, Flavio Oliveira, and Andrew Ko. 2012. Designing for a billion users: a case study of facebook. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 419--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jeasik Cho, and Allen Trent. (2006). Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative Research, 6(3):319--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. comScore. 2012(a). Facebook Blasts into Top Position in Brazilian Social Networking Market Following Year of Tremendous Growth. Available in: http://goo.gl/TcXcM. Last access: Dec 23, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. comScore. 2012(b). Argentina Ranks First in Worldwide Desktop Social Networking Engagement at Nearly 10 Hours per Visitor Each Month. Available in: http://goo.gl/cLLzM. Last access: Dec 23, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. comScore. 2015. Brazil Digital Future in Focus. Available in: https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Presentations-and-Whitepapers/2015/2015-Brazil-Digital-Future-in-Focus. Last access: Dec 23, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Consumer Reports News. 2012. Facebook may let children under age 13 use the site. Available in: https://goo.gl/KfTtZl Last access: Dec 23, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sérgio R. P. da Silva, and Roberto Pereira. 2008. Aspectos da interação humano-computador na web social. In Proceedings of the IX Simpósio Brasileiro de Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais -- IHC 2008, Outubro de 2008, pp. 350--553. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ratan Dey, Zubin Jelveh, and Keith Ross. 2012. Facebook users have become much more private: A large-scale study. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Security and Social Networking. IEEE, pp. 346--352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ratan Dey, Cong Tang, Keith Ross, and Nitesh Saxena. 2012. Estimating age privacy leakage in online social networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2012, Orlando, FL, USA, 2836--2840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ratan Dey, Yuan Ding, and Keith W. Ross. 2013. Profiling high-school students with facebook: how online privacy laws can actually increase minors' risk. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Internet measurement conference (IMC '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 405--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Imen Ben Dhia, Talel Abdessalem, and Mauro Sozio. 2012. Primates: a privacy management system for social networks. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (CIKM '12), NY, USA, 2746--2748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Maeve Duggan, Nicole b. Ellison, Cliff Lampe, Amanda Lenhart, and Mary Madden. 2015. Social Media Update 2014. In Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available in: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/, Last access: Dec 23, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Maeve Duggan, Nicole b. Ellison, Cliff Lampe, Amanda Lenhart and Mary Madden. 2015. Mobile Messaging and Social Media 2015. In Pew Research Center. Available in: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/, Last access: Dec 23, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dan Fitton, Beth Bell, Janet C. Read, Ole Iversen, Linda Little, and Matthew Horton. 2014. Understanding teen UX: building a bridge to the future. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 79--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Philip WL Fong, Mohd Anwar, and Zhen Zhao. 2009. A privacy preservation model for facebook-style social network systems. In Computer Security - ESORICS, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 303--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Alastair J. Gill, Asimina Vasalou, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, and Adam N. Joinson. 2011. Privacy dictionary: a linguistic taxonomy of privacy for content analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3227--3236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Shuli Gilutz, and Jakob Nielsen. 2002. Usability of Websites for Children: Children (Ages 3--12) on the Web - 70 Design Guidelines. 3rd Edition. Nielsen Norman Group. Available in: www.nngroup.com/reports/kids/. Last access: Dec 23, 2016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sameer Hinduja, and Justin W. Patchin. 2008. Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 125--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Michal Jakob, Zbynek Moler, Michal Pechoucek, and Roman Vaculin. 2011. Intelligent Content-Based Privacy Assistant for Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 01 (WI-IAT '11), Vol. 1. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 499--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Manoel Pereira Junior, Simone Isabela de Rezende Xavier, and Raquel Oliveira Prates. 2014. Investigating the Use of a Simulator to Support Users in Anticipating Impact of Privacy Settings in Facebook. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 63--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Michaela Kauer, Benjamin Franz, Thomas Pfeiffer, Martin Heine, and Delphine Christin. 2013. Improving privacy settings for facebook by using interpersonal distance as criterion. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 793--798. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hanna Krasnova, and Natasha F. Veltri. 2010. Privacy Calculus on Social Networking Sites: Explorative Evidence from Germany and USA, In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yabing Liu, Krishna P. Gummadi, Balachander Krishnamurthy, and Alan Mislove. 2011. Analyzing facebook privacy settings: user expectations vs. reality. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference (IMC '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sonia Livingstone, Kjartan Ólafsson, and Elisabeth Staksrud. 2011. Social networking, age and privacy. EU Kids Online, London, UK. Available in: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35849/. Last access: Dec 23, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Amanda Meincke Melo, and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2003. Design with children: a Semiotic approach. In Proceedings of the Latin American conference on Human-computer interaction (CLIHC '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 69--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jakob Nielsen. 1993. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Usability inspection methods. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94), NY, USA, 413--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jakob Nielsen. 2000. Why you only need to test with 5 users. 2000. Available in: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/. Last access: Dec 23, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. TEMPO (Jornal). 2014. Pedófilo se passa por atriz de Chiquititas para abordar cri anças. . Available in: http://www.otempo.com.br/capa/brasil/ped%C3%B3filo-se-passa-por-atriz-de-chiquititas-para-abordar-crian%C3%A7as-1.906223. Last access: Dec--23, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Walter Willinger, Reza Rejaie, Mojtaba Torkjazi, Masoud Valafar, and Mauro Maggioni. 2010. Research on online social networks: time to face the real challenges. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 37, 3 (January 2010), 49--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. João Paulo Pesce, Diego Las Casas, Gustavo Rauber, and Virgílio Almei da. 2012. Privacy attacks in social media using photo tagging networks: a case study with Facebook. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Privacy and Security in Online Social Media (PSOSM '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kamila R. H. Rodrigues, Maíra C. Canal, Rogério A. C. Xavier, Tatiana S. Alencar, and Vânia P. A. Neris. 2012. Avaliando aspectos de privacidade no Facebook pelas lentes de usabilidade, acessibilidade e fatores emocionais. In Companion Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '12). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Brazil, 75--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Alan Rubel, and Ryan Biava. "A framework for analyzing and comparing privacy states." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65.12 (2014): 2422--2431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Zaineb de Souza, and Geoffrey N. Dick. 2009. Disclosure of information by children in social networking - Not just a case of "you show me yours and I'll show you mine". International Journal of Information Management. (2009), 255--261 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ho Keung Tsoi, and Li Chen. From privacy concern to uses of social network sites: A cultural comparison via user survey. 2011. In Proceedings of the Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third Inernational Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), vol., no., pp.457--464, 9--11 Oct. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Maria Lúcia B. Villela and Raquel O. Prates. 2015. Supporting Designers in Modeling Privacy for Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (IHC'15). November 03-06, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Christo Wilson, Bryce Boe, Alessandra Sala, Krishna P.N. Puttaswamy, and Ben Y. Zhao. 2009. User interactions in social networks and their implications. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM European conference on Computer systems (EuroSys '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 205--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Privacy for Children and Teenagers on Social Networks from a Usability Perspective: A Case Study on Facebook

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WebSci '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference
          June 2017
          438 pages
          ISBN:9781450348966
          DOI:10.1145/3091478

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          © 2017 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 June 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          WebSci '17 Paper Acceptance Rate30of85submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

          Upcoming Conference

          Websci '24
          16th ACM Web Science Conference
          May 21 - 24, 2024
          Stuttgart , Germany

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader