Yongren Shi
Ingmar Weber
ABSTRACT
Survey research reveals deep partisan divisions in the U.S. that extend beyond politics to include cultural tastes, lifestyle choices, and consumer preferences. We show how co-following on Twitter can be used to measure the extent to which these divisions are also evident in social media. We measure political alignment (location on the red-blue spectrum), relevance (overlap between cultural and political interests), and polarization (internal division) in music, movies, hobbies, sports, vehicles, food and drink, technology, universities, religions, and business. The results provide compelling evidence that "Tesla liberals"{ and "bird hunting conservatives" are stereotypes grounded in empirical reality.
- Alan I. Abramowitz. 2011. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Lada A. Adamic and Natalie Glance. 2005. The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided They Blog. In LinkKDD. 36--43. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Delia Baldassarri and Andrew Gelman. 2008. Partisans Without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. Amer. J. Sociology 114, 2 (2008), 408--446.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pablo Barbera. 2015. Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data. Political Analysis 23, 1 (2015), 76.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bill Bishop. 2008. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Rorbert Bond and Solomon Messing. 2015. Quantifying Social Media's Political Space: Estimating Ideology from Publicly Revealed Preferences on Facebook. American Political Science Review 109, 01 (2015), 62--78. Figure 8: Network Visualization of the Co-following Pattern of the Billboard 100 Music Artists. Nodes are colored according to their imputed political alignment.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adam Bonica. 2013. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public version 1.0. (2013). http://data.stanford.edu/dime.Google Scholar
- Michael Conover, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew R. Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2011. Political Polarization on Twitter. In ICWSM.Google Scholar
- Philip E. Converse. 2006. The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review 18, 1--3 (2006), 1--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel DellaPosta, Yongren Shi, and Michael Macy. 2015. Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes? Amer. J. Sociology 120, 5 (2015), 1473--1511.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul DiMaggio, John Evans, and Bethany Bryson. 1996. Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized? Amer. J. Sociology 102, 3 (1996), 690--755.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morris P. Fiorina, Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy Pope. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
- Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella and Ingmar Weber. 2014. Co-following on twitter. In HyperText. 249--254. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella and Ingmar Weber. 2017. A Long-Term Analysis of Polarisation on Twitter. In ICWSM. to appear.Google Scholar
- Scott A. Golder and Michael W. Macy. 2014. Digital Footprints: Opportunities and Challenges for Online Social Research. Annual Review of Sociology 40, 1 (2014), 129--152.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James Davison Hunter. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. Basic Books.Google Scholar
- William Labov. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume III, Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal. 1991. Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science 35 (1991), 228--278. Issue 1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal. 2001. Congress: a Political-economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- M.Angeles Serrano, Marián Boguñá, and Alessandro Vespignani. 2009. Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks. 106, 16 (2009), 6483-- 6488.Google Scholar
- Feng Shi, Yongren Shi, Fedor Dokshin, Michael W. Macy, and James Evans. 2017. Millions of Online Book Co-purchases Reveal Partisan Differences in the Consumption of Science. Nature Human Behavior 3, 0079 (2017).Google Scholar
- Yongren Shi and Michael W. Macy. 2016. Measuring Structural Similarity in Large Online Networks. Social Science Research 59 (2016), 97--106.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Cultural Fault Lines and Political Polarization
Recommendations
Ideological motives, digital divides, and political polarization: How do political party preference and values correspond with the political use of social media?
Highlights- Paper examines how Finnish party supporters engage in political discussion on social media.
AbstractSocial media provides new platforms for political participation and ideological categorization. However, little research has been done on how party preference is related to politically active social media use. We begin with a ...
Social Media Use, Political Polarization, and Social Capital: Is Social Media Tearing the U.S. Apart?
Social Computing and Social Media. Design, Ethics, User Behavior, and Social Network AnalysisAbstractWhile some polarization is potentially beneficial for democracy, hyper-polarization can lead to political gridlock, tribalism, and even physical violence. Given the gravity of these concerns, we use data from 1,424 residents of Virginia, USA to ...
Political Interaction Beyond Party Lines: Communication Ties and Party Polarization in Parliamentary Twitter Networks
A growing body of research has examined the uptake of social media by politicians, the formation of communication ties in online political networks, and the interplay between social media and political polarization. However, few studies have analyzed how ...
Comments