skip to main content
10.1145/3092090.3092113acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmisncConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effect of Online Advertisement Types on Click Behavior in Mongolia: Mediating Impact of Emotion

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a study that empirically examine a research model that describes click behavior of online advertisements (ad) posted in the online community. The effect of design types of online ad is compared that considers video and picture ad for the same product from the same company. Moreover, emotion that is evoked by the ad is tested for the alternation power of effect of design type on click attitude after browsing the ads. Based on the data analysis of 154 valid samples for video type ad and 177 for the picture ad from Mongolia, the main research findings are as follows: (1) Both video and picture types of design of ad are highly associated with click attitude, (2) Both types of ads are significantly related to emotion evoked, (3) Mediation effect of emotion is confirmed partially significant in the video type whereas insignificant in the picture one, mainly because of the strength of emotion induced. Discussion and implications are also addressed.

References

  1. Abideen, Z.U., and Saleem, S. 2011. Effective advertising and its influence on consumer buying behavior. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(3), 55--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Agichtein, E., Castillo, C, Donato, D., Gionis, A., and Mishne, G. 2008. Finding high-quality content in social media. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 183--194). ACM: WSDM'08, February 11-12, Palo Alto, California, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179--211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Amberg, M., Fischer, S., and Schröder, M. 2005. Analysis of user acceptance for web-based aptitude tests with DART. In Proceedings of 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2005), Omaha/Nebraska, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersen, P. 2007. What is Web 2.0?: ideas, technologies and implications for education. Bristol: JISC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Aydınoğlu, N.Z., and Cian, L. 2014. Show me the product, show me the model: Effect of picture type on attitudes toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 506--519. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bernoff, J., and Li, C. 2008. Harnessing the power of the ohso-social web. MIT Sloan management review, 49(3), 36--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, L.L. 1995. Relationship marketing of services---growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of marketing science, 23(4), 236--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Breuer, R., and Brettel, M. 2012. Short- and long-term effects of online advertising: Differences between new and existing customers. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 155--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bughin, J.R. 2007. How companies can make the most of user-generated content. McKinsey Quarterly, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chesbrough H. 2006. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chi, H.H. 2011. Interactive digital advertising vs. virtual brand community: Exploratory study of user motivation and social media marketing responses in Taiwan. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12, 44--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chu, S.C. 2011. Viral advertising in social media: Participation in Facebook groups and responses among college-aged users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12, 30--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. CMO Council. 2015. Marketing Spend Facts & Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.cmocouncil.org/facts-stats-categories.php?category=marketing-spend.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Constantinides, E. 2006. the Marketing Mix Revisited: Towards the 21st Century Marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(3-4), 407--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Cox, S.A. 2010. Online social network member attitude toward online advertising formats. Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. CRCMS (2015). Communication Regulatory Commission of Mongolia Statistic. Retrieved from http://crc.gov.mn/enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Deighton, J., and Kornfeld, L. 2009. Interactivity's unanticipated consequences for marketers and marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23, 4--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Edell, J.A., and Burke, M.C. 1987. The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 421--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Hallerman, D. 2008. Behavioral targeting: Marketing trends, eMarketer.com. Available at: www.emarketer.com/Reports/All//Emarketer_2000487.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Holbrook, M.B., and Batra, R. 1987. Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 404--420 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Lohtia, R., Donthu, N., and Hershberger, E.K. 2003. The impact of content and design elements on banner advertising click-through rates. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(4), 410--418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. López-Mosquera, N., and Sánchez, M. 2014. Cognitive and affective determinants of satisfaction, willingness to pay, and loyalty in suburban parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(2), 375--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Mangold, W.G., and Faulds, D. 2009. Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. McQuarrie, E.F. 2008. Differentiating the pictorial element in advertising. Visual Marketing: From Attention to Action. New York: Erlbaum, 91--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mulligan, M., Banerjee, T., and Thomas, N. 2008. European paid content and activity forecast, 2008 to 2013. Jupiter Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ngai, E.W.T. 2003. Selection of web sites for online advertising using the AHP. Information & Management, 40(4), 233--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Prahalad, C.K., and Krishnan, M.S. 2008. The new age of innovation: Driving co-created value through Global Networks. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rayner, K., and Castelhano, M.S. 2008. Eye movements during reading, scene perception, visual search, and while looking at print advertisements. Visual Marketing: From Attention to Action. New York: Erlbaum, 9--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Thomas, A.R. 2007. The end of mass marketing: or, why all successful marketing is now direct marketing. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 1(1), 6--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Wilcha, K. 2005. Winning Ways. SHOOT magazine, 3, 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Allen, C. T., Machleit, K. A., Kleine, S. S. and Notani, A. S. 2005. A place for emotion in attitude models. Journal of Business Research, 58, 494--499. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Laros, F. J. M. and Steenkamp, J. 2005. Emotions in consumer behavior: a hierarchical approach, Journal of Business Research, 58, 1437--1445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MISNC '17: Proceedings of the 4th Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference
    July 2017
    332 pages
    ISBN:9781450348812
    DOI:10.1145/3092090

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 17 July 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate57of97submissions,59%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader