skip to main content
10.1145/3095140.3095160acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescgiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

Enhancing volume visualization with lightness anchoring theory

Published:27 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Volume rendering is an effective method for visualizing 3D data. However, it's still difficult to obtain an effective image, especially when there are complicated structures which may cause underexposure problems. Adjusting light sources and parameters adds computational cost, without alleviating the underexposure phenomenon. This paper presents the novel idea of applying lightness anchoring theory for volume visualization enhancement. An anchoring hypothesis, the Highest-Luminance-As-White rule, is adjusted to adapt our volume rendered image. After employing the lightness anchored optimization, underexposed areas can be revealed while still preserving the local depth relationship.

References

  1. Edward H. Adelson. 2000. Lightness Perception and Lightness Illusions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 339--351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Vijeth Dinesha, Neeharika Adabala, and Vijay Natarajan. 2012. Uncertainty Visualization Using HDR Volume Rendering. The Visual Computer 28, 3 (2012), 265--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Frédo Durand and Julie Dorsey. 2002. Fast Bilateral Filtering for the Display of High-Dynamic-Range Images. ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3 (2002), 257--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Alan Gilchrist, Christos Kossyfidis, Frederick Bonato, Tiziano Agostini, Joseph Cataliotti, Xiaojun Li, Branka Spehar, Vidal Annan, and Elias Economou. 1999. An Anchoring Theory of Lightness Perception. Psychological Review 106, 4(1999), 795--834.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Paul Haeberli. 1993. Matrix Operations for Image Processing. Technical Report. Silicon Graphics Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. F. Hernell, P. Ljung, and A. Ynnerman. 2010. Local Ambient Occlusion in Direct Volume Rendering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 4 (2010), 548--559. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Grzegorz Krawczyk, Karol Myszkowski, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 2005. Lightness Perception in Tone Reproduction for High Dynamic Range Images. In Proceedings of the European Association for Computer Graphics 26th Annual Conference EUROGRAPHICS 2005. 635--645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Kronander, D. Jonsson, J. Low, P. Ljung, A. Ynnerman, and J. Unger. 2012. Efficient Visibility Encoding for Dynamic Illumination in Direct Volume Rendering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 3 (2012), 447--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. William K. Pratt. 2013. Introduction to Digital Image Processing. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Erik Reinhard, Tania Pouli, Timo Kunkel, Ben Long, Anders Ballestad, and Gerwin Damberg. 2012. Calibrated Image Appearance Reproduction. ACM Transactions on Graphics 31, 6 (2012), 201:1--201:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Schlegel, M. Makhinya, and Renato Pajarola. 2011. Extinction-Based Shading and Illumination in GPU Volume Ray-Casting. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (2011), 1795--1802. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Schott, T. Martin, A.V.P. Grosset, C. Brownlee, T. Hollt, B.P. Brown, S.T. Smith, and C.D. Hansen. 2012. Combined Surface and Volumetric Occlusion Shading. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium. 169--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mathias Schott, Vincent Pegoraro, Charles Hansen, Kévin Boulanger, and Kadi Bouatouch. 2009. A Directional Occlusion Shading Model for Interactive Direct Volume Rendering. In Proceedings of the 11th Eurographics / IEEE - VGTC Conference on Visualization. 855--862. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. William Thompson, Roland Fleming, Sarah Creem-Regehr, and Jeanine Kelly Stefanucci. 2011. Visual Perception from a Computer Graphics Perspective (1st ed.). A. K. Peters, Ltd., Natick, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Veronika Šoltészová, Daniel Patel, Stefan Bruckner, and Ivan Viola. 2010. A Multidirectional Occlusion Shading Model for Direct Volume Rendering. In Proceedings of the 12th Eurographics / IEEE - VGTC Conference on Visualization. 883--891. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Li X. and Gilchrist A. 1999. Relative Area and Relative Luminance Combine to Anchor Surface Lightness Values. Perception and Psychophysics 61, 5 (1999), 771--785.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hyunsup Yoon, Youngjoon Han, and Hernsoo Hahn. 2009. Image Contrast Enhancement based Sub-histogram Equalization Technique without Over-equalization Noise. International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic, Electronic and Communication Engineering 3, 2 (2009), 189--195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Xiaoru Yuan, Minh X Nguyen, Baoquan Chen, and David H Porter. 2006. HDR VolVis: High Dynamic Range Volume Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 4 (2006), 433--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing volume visualization with lightness anchoring theory

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CGI '17: Proceedings of the Computer Graphics International Conference
          June 2017
          260 pages
          ISBN:9781450352284
          DOI:10.1145/3095140

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 June 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate35of159submissions,22%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader